TOral health is fundamental to human well-being as it serves as the foundation for overall body health (1). The oral cavity acts as a critical gateway, facilitating the passage of substances from the external environment to the stomach (2, 3). Furthermore, it serves as a reservoir for various microorganisms, including Helicobacter pylori, Neisseria spp, and different streptococcal species, which can contribute to diseases within the oral cavity and beyond the gastrointestinal tract. Recent studies have highlighted the potential risk of H. pylori in the oral cavity for recurrent gastric infections (4, 5).
The impact of oral health extends far beyond the confines of the oral cavity, with repercussions on broader aspects of human health. In the studies conducted by Moghadam et al. (6, 7), they confirmed that there is a significant association between changes in oral microbiome bacteria, increased inflammatory cytokines, and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Furthermore, the microbiome is considered one of the health biomarkers by many researchers. This has led to the association of microbiome changes with many neurological diseases (8).
Dental caries involves localized destruction of dental hard tissues due to acids produced by bacterial fermentation of dietary carbohydrates (9). Its global prevalence affects both developed and developing nations (10).
However, dental caries, a prevalent oral disease affecting individuals worldwide, significantly affects children and substantially impacts their overall quality of life (11). Despite efforts to combat dental caries, it remains a persistent public health challenge in many countries and can lead to tooth loss if left untreated (12).
Dental erosion is another oral health condition characterized by the chemical loss of mineralized tooth substance caused by exposure to acids unrelated to oral bacteria (13). It affects individuals across societies, age groups, and cultures, particularly the older population with natural teeth (14).
Both dental caries and erosion are chronic processes that evolve and share common risk factors, including reduced saliva flow and its protective components (15). Saliva, being a non-invasive sample, presents an attractive option for epidemiological studies due to its convenient and painless collection, along with minimal risk to the participants (16).
H. pylori, one of the most prevalent bacterial pathogens globally, is estimated to have infected approximately 4.4 billion individuals in 2015 (14). Detecting H. pylori is crucial for diagnosis and management. Several invasive and non-invasive methods are available for its detection, each with its unique advantages, disadvantages, and limitations. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, in particular, holds promise for detecting H. pylori in saliva samples, providing a viable alternative for diagnosis (17). Numerous studies have successfully isolated H. pylori from various oral specimens, such as dental plaque, saliva, and dental pulp (18, 19). Moreover, the presence of H. pylori in the oral cavity alone has been linked to various oral diseases (20). Dental plaque, formed through biofilm accumulation, has been identified as a carrier for H. pylori, further emphasizing the importance of understanding its role in oral health (21, 22).
This study aims to detect H. pylori using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique in saliva and plaque samples from patients with H. pylori infection. Furthermore, it seeks to explore the relationship between H. pylori detection and the presence of dental caries and erosion.
Study Design and Participants
This case-control study included 40 patients infected with H. pylori after laboratory examination (Stool Antigen Test or Antibodies Rapid Test) as a study group and 40 subjects who were given negative results for H. pylori after laboratory examination as a control group. The subjects of the present study from patients who attend different hospitals in Baghdad city with an age range of (30-40) years. Before data collection, ethical approval was obtained from the ethical approval committee, College of Dentistry / the University of Baghdad, to perform this study (Ref. number:479); Before starting the examination, collect demographic information about name, gender, age, symptoms, medical history, and oral health status from each study and control group.
Dental Examinations
Dental caries examinations were conducted using mouth dental mirrors and CPI probes, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria in 2013 (23). To assess dental erosion, the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE) criteria from 2011, established by Lussi and Thomas, were employed (24).
Saliva and Subgingival Plaque Collection
Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from both groups using the spitting method described by Khurshid et al. (25). Participants were instructed to remain calm, minimize movement, and accumulate saliva on the floor of their mouths before spitting it into a sterile disposable cap. This process was repeated every 30 seconds for a total of 5 minutes. The collected saliva samples were immediately placed in a cooling box, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was separated using a micropipette and stored at -20°C until analysis (26).
Subgingival plaque samples were collected by inserting two sterile paper points into the gingival sulcus for 20 seconds, following the area's isolation using sterile cotton rolls to prevent contamination from saliva. Samples were collected from all posterior teeth and placed in sterile tubes containing 1.5 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7. The samples were stored in dry ice coolers during transportation to the laboratory and kept at -20°C until DNA extraction (27).
DNA Extraction and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Following the manufacturer's instruction, H. pylori DNA was extracted using the AddPrep Bacterial Genomic Extraction kit (Add Bio, Korea). Briefly. The DNA pellet was rehydrated by adding 100 µL of rehydration solution and kept at -20°C until further assay. After extracting DNA from saliva and plaque specimens from patients and control subjects and using specific primers (Table 1), the PCR amplification was carried out according to a published protocol (28). Each PCR reaction mixture (20 μL) was prepared using HS Prime Taq Premix (2X) (GeNetBio, Korea). The PCR cocktail mixtures were prepared in 20 µL containing a final concentration of 1X Taq Master Mix, 1 µM of each primer, and 2 µL of DNA template (2 ng/µL). The PCR was done using a T100 BioRad thermal cycler (BioRad., USA).
The activation of polymerase was carried out at 95°C for 10 minutes. For 30 cycles, the step of DNA denaturation was carried out at 95°C for 45 seconds and then followed by primers annealing at 57°C for a similar period. The temperature was raised to 72°C for one minute to allow the extension of primer-mediated amplification of the targeted genes. Finally, a five-minute final extension at 72°C was performed.
Examination of PCR products was done via agarose gel electrophoresis according to manufacturer instructions (GeNetBio, Korea). The gel was examined under UV light using a gel documentation system (Gel Doc EZ Image, Bio-Rad, USA) to document and determine expected bands.
Table 1. Primers used for amplification of specific genes of H. pylori.
Primer name | Sequence 5́ – 3´ | Product size (bp) | Ref. |
HP16S | F- GGCTATGACGGGTATCCGGC R- GCCGTGCAGCACCTGTTTTC |
764 | (27) |
Vac A-F | F-ATGGAAATACAACAAACACAC R- CTGCTTGAATGCGCCAAAC |
259 | (27) |
Cag A | F- CGTTAGCTGCATTACTGGAGA R-GAGCGCGTAGGCGGGATAGTC |
295 | (29) |
Statistical Analysis
Using Statistical Package for Social Science version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) for data description, Analysis, and presentation were performed. It was classified into two categories:
1- Descriptive Analysis:
Frequency is the percentage for qualitative variables, while mean, Standard Deviation (SD), and Standard Error (SE) are for the quantitative variable.
2- Inferential Analysis:
Independent Sample T-test: the parametric test of the difference between two groups.
The finding in Table 2 showed that the higher cases of negative H. pylori PCR were in plaque while the higher cases of positive H. pylori PCR were in saliva, and there was a moderate positive significant correlation between the saliva and plaque.
Table 2. H. pylori PCR of saliva and plaque in the study group.
N | % | r | P-value | ||
Saliva | -Ve | 15 | 37.5 | 0.501 | 0.000 |
+Ve | 25 | 62.5 | |||
Plaque | -Ve | 22 | 55.0 | ||
+Ve | 18 | 45.0 |
+Ve: positive cases N: number.
-Ve: negative cases r: person correlation.
The findings in Table 3 showed no positive H. pylori PCR cases in the control group; in contrast, 28 subjects (70%) of the study group had positive PCR.
Caries experience among the study and control groups is shown in Table 4. Results showed that caries experience for the study group was higher than that for the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) in DS and DMFT but no significant difference in other components (P>0.05).
Findings in Table 5 revealed that caries experience only DS and FS were higher in negative cases than those in positive cases but with statistically no significant difference. At the same time, other variables were higher in positive cases than negative cases but with no significant differences except MS; statistically, its result was significant (P<0.05). Furthermore, the results of this study revealed that dental erosion was higher among the study group than those among the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05), as shown in Table 6.
Table 3. Detection of H. pylori PCR among study and control groups.
PCR | Groups | X2 | P-value | Total | |||||
Study | Control | ||||||||
N | % | N | % | 43.077 | 0.000 | N | % | ||
+ve | 28 | 70.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 28 | 35.00 | |||
-ve | 12 | 30.00 | 40 | 100.00 | 52 | 65.00 | |||
Total | 40 | 100.00 | 40 | 100.00 | 80 | 100.00 |
Table 4. Carie's experience among study and control groups.
Variables | Groups | |||||
Study | Control | |||||
Mean | ±SE | Mean | ±SE | T-test | P- value | |
DS | 6.800 | 0.336 | 3.500 | 0.601 | 4.790* | 0.000 |
MS | 2.000 | 0.641 | 2.750 | 0.839 | 0.711 | 0.480 |
FS | 2.050 | 0.334 | 2.575 | 0.237 | 1.282 | 0.204 |
DMFS | 10.850 | 0.884 | 8.825 | 1.263 | 1.313 | 0.193 |
DMFT | 4.950 | 0.347 | 2.900 | 0.279 | 4.602* | 0.000 |
DMFS: Decay, missed, filled surface. SE: Standard Error. DMFT: Decay, missed, filled teeth.
DS: Decayed Surface. MS: Missed Surface. FS: Filled Surface.
Table 5. Caries experience among the study group in relation to the presence of H. pylori.
Variables | H.pylori PCR | |||||||
+ve PCR | -ve PCR | |||||||
N | Mean | ±SE | N | Mean | ±SE | T-test | P-value | |
DS | 28 | 6.500 | 0.407 | 12 | 7.500 | 0.571 | 1.427 | 0.167 |
MS | 28 | 2.679 | 0.871 | 12 | 0.417 | 0.417 | 2.342 | 0.025 |
FS | 28 | 1.750 | 0.380 | 12 | 2.750 | 0.653 | 1.324 | 0.201 |
DMFS | 28 | 10.929 | 1.185 | 12 | 10.667 | 1.089 | 0.163 | 0.872 |
DMFT | 28 | 5.250 | 0.617 | 12 | 4.821 | 0.424 | 0.572 | 0.573 |
N: number. DMFS: Decay, missed, filled surface. SE: Standard Error.
DMFT: Decay, missed, filled teeth. DS: Decayed Surface. MS: Missed Surface.
FS: Filled Surface.
Table 6. Dental erosion among study and control groups.
Dental erosion | Groups | z-test | P- value | ||
Study | Control | ||||
Median | 5 | 0 | 7.781 | 0.000 | |
Mean rank | 60.43 | 20.58 |
Finally, findings in Table (6) showed that dental erosion was higher in positive cases than in negative cases but with statistically no significant difference (P>0.05).
Dental erosion | H.pylori PCR | z-test | P- value | ||
+ve | -ve | ||||
Median | 6 | 5 | 0.780 | 0.457 | |
Mean rank | 22.67 | 19.57 |
+ve: positive cases. -ve: negative cases.
Poor oral cavity health has been linked to a heightened risk of oral and gastric diseases (30). The presence of H. pylori in the oral cavity can lead to reinfection even after its eradication (31). The urease test must be more specific for detecting H. pylori in dental biofilm. Consequently, oral H. pylori detection primarily relies on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis (32). Thus, bacterial DNA detection in saliva using PCR has become one of the well-established diagnostic methods for H. pylori infection (33). The present study found that PCR–ve H. pylori was mainly detected in plaque. In contrast, the PCR +ve H. pylori were found mainly in saliva, with a moderate positive significant correlation between the two sites. This can be attributed to the high shedding of the bacteria into the saliva from the plaques or may be explained due to the presence of different strains of urease-producing bacteria found in the oral cavity, such as Streptococcus Vestibularis and Actinomyces Viscosus, which may be falsely detected and cause false-positive results (34).
Also, the current study found that the PCR test for H. pylori detection was positive in most (70%) subjects recruited. This percentage was higher than that of Sekhar Goud, Kannan (35), in which H. pylori was identified using PCR in (56.6%) of the total patients. The difference in the results could be attributed to several methodological variations, like sample population characteristics and study design, in addition to lifestyle and regional differences.
Dental caries may affect the presence of systemic H. pylori infection by acting as a reservoir for H. pylori. The current study showed that the caries experience for the study group was higher than that for the control group, with a significant difference in DS and DMFT. A previous study by Chen, and Dou (36) reported the same findings; these results could be explained by the fact that the caries cavity is a retentive area for plaque and is difficult to reach with a brush during oral cleaning, making it difficult to remove accumulated oral bacteria. Therefore, the caries cavity could serve as a reservoir for H. pylori because self-cleaning is difficult to work, contributing to inducing systemic H. pylori infection. This finding aligns with that reported in a previous study by Hamada, and Nomura (37), in which patients with severe dental caries showed a higher detection rate of H. pylori in their saliva than those patients who do not have caries.
Also, the results of the present study revealed that dental erosion was significantly higher among the study group than the control group, with significant differences. This could be explained by the fact that most patients with H. pylori infection have gastric reflux, and the pH of stomach acid is much lower than the critical pH of enamel dissolution; therefore, reflux of stomach contents into the oral cavity over an extended period can cause severe loss of tooth structure, or it may be due to that when reduced salivary flow rate, acid clearance is reduced. Less dilution of acid will be present upon attack of the tooth surface, contributing to erosion progress, especially where there is direct contact with the acid. This happens because the acid clearance is the most rapid in that location, and the salivary film velocity is the highest in the mouth (38). This finding aligns with a more recent study by Iwai et al. in 2019, which emphasized that dental caries and erosion may influence systemic H. pylori infection by acting as continuous sources of H. pylori reinfection (19).
Dental caries and erosion may be continuous sources of H. pylori reinfection, potentially influencing systemic H. pylori infection. However, it is essential to note that dental caries and erosion can occur independently, and the association between the two conditions may not always be apparent. The presence of H. pylori in the oral cavity and its potential for reinfection even after gastric eradication highlights the importance of maintaining good oral health for overall well-being. Further research is needed to elucidate the complex relationship between oral and gastric H. pylori infections and their impact on human health.
An important association between H. pylori colonization in dental plaque and saliva and oral diseases, including dental caries and erosion.
This study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, (Ref. number:479).
None.
None.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions | |
![]() |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |