Cluster Analysis and Mapping of Iranian Researchers in the Field of Parasitology:With an Emphasis on the Co-authoreship Indicators and H Index

Khasseh, Ali Akbar; Soosaraei, Masoud; Fakhar, Mahdi

year 10, Issue 2 (May - June 2016) Iran J Med Microbiol 2016, 10(2): 63-74 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Khasseh A A, Soosaraei M, Fakhar M. Cluster Analysis and Mapping of Iranian Researchers in the Field of Parasitology:With an Emphasis on the Co-authoreship Indicators and H Index. Iran J Med Microbiol 2016; 10 (2) :63-74
URL: http://ijmm.ir/article-1-519-en.html

Cluster Analysis and Mapping of Iranian Researchers in the Field of Parasitology:With an Emphasis on the Co-authoreship Indicators and H Index

Ali Akbar Khasseh¹

, Masoud Soosaraei²

, Mahdi Fakhar

1- Department of Konwlege and information Science,PayameNoor University,Tehran, Iran
2- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, MazandaranUniversity of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
3- Department of Parasitology, Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran , mahdif53@yahoo.com

Abstract: (15384 Views)

Background and Aim: The use of bibliometric methods identify the best researchers in various fields on the one hand, and scientific mapping of specific disciplines on the other hand at the international level has become popular gradually. The aim of the present study was to determine top researchers in the field of parasitology based on centrality and combine indicators.

Materials and Methods: The study uses a bibliometric methodology. The initial data of this study, which comprises Iranian Parasitology researchers have been retrieved from Web of Science during 1972-2015. After loading and storage of records, the researchers used scientometric software (UCINet, NetDraw, VOSviewer, and BibExcel) to answer research questions.

Results: The results indicated there are 1271 scientific productions conducted by Iranians in the field of Parasitology.Mohebali, Vatandoost, and Oshagi are the most active researchers in Parasotology, respectively.

Conclusions: Generally, according to findings from different parts of the current study (number of articles, h-index, and centrality indicators), it can be stated that Mohebali is the most influential parasitology researcher in Iran.

Keywords: Parasitology, Scientific map, H-index, Co-authorship, Scientometric measures

Full-Text [PDF 1388 kb] (5398 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Medical Parasitology
Received: 2016/01/19 | Accepted: 2016/04/9 | ePublished: 2016/07/24

References

1. Namdar L, Salajagheh M, Osareh F. Scientific output of Parasitoloy researchers in SCI during 1995-2010 based on mapping structure. Strid Dev Med Educ 2013; 10(1): 13-26.

2. Yousefi A, Gilvari A, Shahmirzadi T, Hemmat M, Keshavarz M. A survey of scientific production of Iranian researchers in the field of immunology in the ISI database. Razi J Me Sci 2012; 19 (96): 1-11. [Article]

3. Khasseh A A, Fakhar M, Soosaraei M, Sadeghi S. Present situation of scientific productions of Iranian researchers in parasitology domain in ISI databases. Iran J Med Microbiol. 2011; 5 (1 and 2) :53-65 [In Persian] [Article]

4. Truex III DP, Cuellar MJ, Takeda H. Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse. J Asso Info Sys 2009; 10(7): 560--594. [Article]

5. Rowe F. What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. Eur J Info Sys 2014; 23(3): 241-255. [Article]

6. Soheili F.The Analysis of Social Network Structure of Co-authorship in Scientific Output of Information Science Researchers for the Purpose of Recognition and Measurement of Co-authorship Relations, Interactions and Strategies in this Discipline. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Knowledge and Knowledge Science, Shahid Chamran Univ Ahvaz, Iran 2012 [In Persian]

7. Yousefi A, Hemmat M, Gilvari A, Shahmirzadi T. Citation analysis and co-authorship of Iranian researchers in the field of immunology in ISI web of science: a brief report. Tehran Univ Med J 2012; 70(3): 188-193. [In Persian] [Article]

8. Michalopoulos A, Falagas M. A Bibliometric analysis of global research production in respiratory medicine. CHEST 2005; 128(6): 3993-8. [Article]

9. Osareh F, SeratiShirazi M, Khademi R. A Survey on Co-authorship Network of Iranian Researchers in the field of Pharmacy and Pharmacology in Web of Science during 2000-2012. J Health Adm2014; 17(56): 33-45.[In Persian]. [Article]

10. Sadat Moosavi A. Analysis of the structure of social networks co-authorship in the field of nuclear science and technology and the use of person-centered approach based networks. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Information and Knowledge, Islamic Azad Uni, Science and Research Branch of Tehran 2015.

11. Freeman LC.Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1979; 1(3): 215-239. [Article]

12. Mutschke P. Mining networks and central entities in digital libraries. A graph theoretic approach applied to co-author networks. Adv Intelli Data Analys V 2003; 2810: 155–166. [Article]

13. Liu X, Bollen J, Nelson ML, Van de Sompel H. Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Inform Process Manag 2005; 41(6): 1462–1480. [Article]

14. TruexIII DP, Cuellar MJ, Takeda H, Vidgen R.The Scholarly Influence of HeinzKlein: Ideational and Social Measures of His Impact on IS Research and IS Scholars. Eur J Inform Sys. 2011; 20(4): 422-439. [Article]

15. Yin LC, Kretschmer H, Hanneman RA, Liu ZY.Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the collnet network. Inform Process Manag. 2006; 42(6): 1599–1613. [Article]