year 13, Issue 5 (November - December 2019)                   Iran J Med Microbiol 2019, 13(5): 355-373 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ranjbar R, Roayaei Ardakani M, Mehrabi Kushki M, kazeminezhad I. Identification of Toxigenic Aspergillus Species from Rice of Khuzestan and Mycotoxins in Imported Cereals. Iran J Med Microbiol 2019; 13 (5) :355-373
URL: http://ijmm.ir/article-1-971-en.html
1- Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2- Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran , roayaei_m@yahoo.com
3- Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
4- Department of Physic, Faculty of Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 1743 kb]   (2164 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (5239 Views)
Full-Text:   (3392 Views)
Introduction

.

Mycotoxins are low-molecular-weight natural products that are produced by filamentous fungi as secondary metabolites (1). There are five important mycotoxins that are naturally present in crops, including Aflatoxin produced by Aspergillus flavus, ochratoxin produced by Aspergillus ochraceus and Penicillium verrucosum, Zearalenone and doxy-nivalenol produced by Fusarium graminearum, and Fumonisin produced by Fusarium verticillioides (2). Six of the 18 different types of aflatoxin identified are of major importance, including B1, B2, G1, G2, M1, M2. Aflatoxin B1 has been classified as a Group A carcinogen by world health organization (WHO), for its constant contribution to the pathogenesis of liver cells (1,5). Currently being used to detect a wide variety of mycotoxins, High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) leads to the production of reliable data and accurate, precise and repeatable results, and will usually be of interest to researchers (6).
Although the weather in a particular country may not cause the development of a particular mycotoxin such as aflatoxin, the problem may come from another country in the form of crops such as peanuts and corn.


 

Materials and Methods

Isolation of Aspergillus Species
Collecting Rice Samples

In November 2015, 50 samples of rice husk from Baghmalek (23 samples of Champa), Shadegan (12 samples of Anbarboo) and Shooshtar (15 samples of Anbarboo) were collected through non-random convenience sampling. About 300 gr of rice husk was collected and transferred to the laboratory in sterile bags.

Isolation of Aspergillus Colonies from Rice Samples
One hundred rice seeds were randomly selected from each sample after washing and culturing on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA), based on colonial appearance and reproductive organs.

Identification of Aspergillus Strains Based on Morphological Traits
After 5 to 7 days of daily growth of the fungi and the type and shape of the colonies (Figure 1), Aspergillus fungi were identified by mycological and physiological methods according to John I. Pitt Diagnostic Key.
 Classification of this group based on morphological identification is a traditional way that is very difficult and can lead to misdiagnosis, especially for Aspergillus niger species, which are a group of morphologically indistinguishable species (8-10).

Identification of Aspergillus Strains Based on ITS Sequencing
Fungal Mycelium Production and DNA Extraction

The grown mycelium mass was collected in SDB medium, washed with sterile distilled water and then dehydrated. The mycelium mass was powdered in liquid nitrogen. DNA isolation was performed with the modification of Raeder & Broda (1985) (with minor modification) (11,12).
Mycelium powder was purified and protein degraded in three successive stages using phenol, chloroform, and isoamyl alcohol. The DNA was finally collected by ethanol precipitation and washed with 70% ethanol.

ITS Gene Amplification
The ITS1-F and ITS4-R primer pairs were used to amplify around 600 bp of ITS regions. The reaction was performed in a thermocycler (Biorad) with the following temperature program: 3 min at 95°C and then 35 cycles, 95°C for 30 sec., 52°C for 40 sec., 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min.

Measurement and Determination of Mycotoxins Level and Type by HPLC
Sample Collection

The analysis of mycotoxins in imported cereal was carried on 50 samples out of 2750 samples referred from Imam Khomeini Port Customs in winter, spring, summer and autumn 2016. It should be noted that the basis for the determination and detection of mycotoxins by the HPLC method was the same in all cases according to the standards of the National Iranian Standards Organization.

Sample Preparation
Fifty grams of samples were weighed for testing mycotoxins according to Iranian National Standard No. 6872 “Human-Animal Feed, Measurement of Group B and G Aflatoxins”, No. 9238 “Cereals and its Products - Measurement of Ochratoxin A”, No. 9239 “Cereals and Products” Its weights - the zearalenone measurement”, and No. 9240 “doxylamine content determination”

Measuring the Amount and Type of Mycotoxins
The toxin was extracted from the samples by solvent extraction (methanol 80%). The extract was diluted with Watman filter paper to a certain concentration after being filtered through a sinter filter. Extracts obtained from the immunoaffinity column containing specific antibodies (ZearalaTest™, AflaTest™, OchraTest ™, DONTest ™) were passed at a drop per second rate and the antigen present in the extract was bound to specific antibodies in the column. Injection, isolation, detection, and determination of Mycotoxins was calculated by reversed-phase HPLC columns and derivative and fluorescence detector, through comparison of the standard substrate surface with an unknown specimen, taking into account the dilution factor in ng/g (HPLC device, KNAUER, Germany). In order to calculate the recovery rate of mycotoxin toxins with a concentration of 1.6 ppb in healthy specimens, spiked specimens were read and extracted in a similar manner. Recovery rates of mycotoxins were in the range of 0-6%. This range is acceptable by national standards and indicates that the extraction operations are well performed.


 

Results

Investigation and Identification of Aspergillus Isolates from Rice
Of the 19 samples sequenced, 8 isolates (group I) were identified as Aspergillus flavus, 2 isolates (group II) as Aspergillus terreus, 1 isolate as Aspergillus nidulans (Group III), 3 isolates as Aspergillus tubingensis, 3 isolates as Aspergillus niger and 1 isolate as Aspergillus SP (Figures 2 and 3).
The ITS region sequences in the studied samples showed 99-100% similarity to the type strains of any gene in the NCBI database (Table 1).

Table 1. Identification results of isolates based on blast morphology and search and their access number registered in the gene bank

Aspergillus has the most similarity Isolate name (registered in GenBank) Gathering location Accession Number of Sequences Registered for this Study in GenBank
    ITS
Aspergillus flavus Sho_R1f Shooshtar KY490723
Sho_R2f Shooshtar KY490717
Bag _R6f Baghmalek KY490710
Bag _R7f Baghmalek KY490714
Bag _R8f Baghmalek KY490709
Bag_R10f Baghmalek KY490722
Sha_R15f Shadegan KY490712
Sha_R18f Shadegan KY490711
Aspergillus terreus Sha_R12t Shadegan KY490721
Sha_R14t Shadegan KY490708
Aspergillus tubingensis Sha_R11tu Shadegan KY490713
Sha_R13tu Shadegan KY490707
Sha_R16tu Shadegan KY490706
Aspergillus nidulans Bag_R5ni Baghmalek KY490724
Aspergillus niger Sho_R4n Shooshtar KY490718
Bag_R9n Baghmalek KY490715
Sha_R17n Shadegan KY490720
Sha_R19n Shadegan KY490719
Aspergillus SP Sho_R3a Shooshtar KY490716
  *All samples have 100-99% sequence similarity to standard samples in the NCBI database.    



Figure 1. Fungal colonies appearing on the SDA medium at 28°C for five days.


Figure 2. Microscopic image of Aspergillus terreus (A: conidiophore (x40); B: Isolated image on the plate, (Aspergillus flavus; C: conidiophore (x40) D: isolate image on the plate) and Aspergillus nidulans (E: conidiophore (x40) F: isolate image on the plate)


Figure 3. Microscopic image of Aspergillus tubingensis (A: conidiophore (x40) B: Isolated image on the plate), Aspergillus niger (C: conidiophore (x40) D: isolate image on the plate) and Aspergillus sp. (E: conidiophore (x40) F: isolate image on the plate)

Results of Mycotoxins Assay
The presence of mycotoxins in imported cereals was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. From winter to autumn 2016, the type and amount of mycotoxin were measured in 2750 samples of cereals referred to customs in three laboratories in Ahvaz. These included corn, wheat, and barley. The mycotoxins tested on these cereals were aflatoxins, zearalenone, deoxynivalenol, and ochratoxin, according to applicants.
The results of the mean cereal contamination of different mycotoxins and their comparison with the national standard of Iran (5925) are presented in Table 1, 2 and 3 respectively (one sample t-test) (Graph pad prism 8). The results of statistical analysis showed that the mean of mycotoxins in different grains had a significant difference with the maximum national standard of each mycotoxin (P<0.05)
Out of 2111 corn samples, 8.4% (689) were over contaminated (5 ppb) in AFB1 and 0.4 (9), 3.3 (2), and 0.1 (3) of samples were over contaminated in AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2, respectively.
The levels of ZEN, DON and OTA mycotoxins in 1139 corn samples were lower than the national standard and lower than 200 ppb, 1000 ppb, and 50 ppb, respectively. Of 166 wheat samples, 4.2% (1.2%) and 1.2% (2%) of samples were contaminated at concentrations below 5 ppb with AFB2 and AFG1, respectively. Also, 13.8% (16) of the samples were contaminated with OTA at less than 5 ppb.
None of the wheat samples showed contamination with DON, ZEN, AFB1, and AFG2. Of the 149 barley samples imported during the sampling interval of this study, only aflatoxins were detected in which no contamination was observed in any of the samples. ANOVA and LSD post hoc tests were used to compare the mean levels of mycotoxins in different months of the year (January to December 2015). According to the results of this test, there was a significant difference between the mean of other mycotoxins in different months of the year (P<0.05).
Of the 50 rice samples tested for aflatoxins, 16 were contaminated with aflatoxin B1, of which only 1 showed more than 5 ppb. Samples 2 and 4 were contaminated with AFB2 and AFG1, respectively, (<5 ppb). The results of the study of mean rice contamination with aflatoxins and comparison with the national standard of Iran are presented in Table 4 (one sample t-test).

Table 2. Comparison of mean mycotoxin contaminants of imported corn with the national standard of Iran in winter and spring 2016

Maximum contamination(ng/g) Spring 2016 Winter2016 National standard maximum allowable
(ng /g)
mycotoxins Grains
P-value Standard deviation Average (ng/g) P-value Standard deviation Average (ng/g)
868.57 0.0007 278.2 329.9 <0.0001 62.31 105.8 1000 DON Corn
123.731 0.0003 4.582 33.58 <0.0001 13.35 13.47 200 ZEN
- <0.0001 0.6621 0.71 <0.0001 0.1385 0.035 50 OTA
169.08 <0.0001 0.0734 0.05 <0.0001 2.669 1.151 5 AFB1
266.77 <0.0001 2.253 1.25 <0.0001 0.973 0.8 20 Total AFs


Table 3. Comparison of mean mycotoxins of imported corn contaminants with the national standard of summer and autumn 2016

Autumn2016 Summer2016 National standard maximum allowable
(ng /g)
Mycotoxins Grains
P-value Standard deviation Average (ng/g) P-value Standard deviation Average (ng/g)
NC 0 0 <0.0001 175.6 496.6 1000 DON Corn
NC 0 0 <0.0001 30.89 54.43 200 ZEN
<0.0001 0.71 0.98 <0.0001 0.73 0.97 50 OTA
0.0025 18.52 7.553 0.28 19.23 7.03 5 AFB1
<0.0001 29.32 11.02 <0.0001 32.86 11.91 5 Total AFs


Table 4. Comparison of mean mycotoxins contaminated by imported wheat with Iranian national standard in spring 2016

Maximum contamination ng/g Spring 2016 National standard maximum allowable
(ng /g)
mycotoxins Grains
P-value Standard deviation Average (ng/g)
- NC 0 0 1000 DON Wheat
- NC 0 0 200 ZEN
4 <0.0001 1.053 2.67 5 OTA
- NC 0 0 5 AFB1
- 0.0016 0.07 0.21 20 Total AFs


Table 5. Comparison of the average Aflatoxins of Khuzestan rice production contaminants with the national standard of Iran

mycotoxins National standard maximum allowable
(ng /g)
Average(ng/g) Standard deviation P-value Maximum contamination(ng/g)
AFB1 5 2.45 4.42 0.036 18.612
Total AFs 20 2.60 4.52 <0.00001 -

 



 

Discussion

In this study, Aspergillus susceptible to toxin production was identified and isolated from rice seeds of Khuzestan province (Champa and Anbarboo). Results showed high percentages of Aspergillus flavus (42.1%) followed by Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus tubingensis, Aspergillus terreus, and Aspergillus nidulans with 21.5%, 15.7%, 10.52%, and 5.26%, respectively. The findings of Nyongesa et al. (2015), Riba et al. (2010) and Gao et al. (2007) showed that Aspergillus flavus was the main pollutant in oilseeds (pistachio, almond, hazelnut), corn, wheat, cereals, and beans, respectively. The results of the studies of Makun et al. (2007), Amadi et al. (2009) were also consistent with this study (13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Because of the saprophyte and widespread toxinogenic fungi such as Aspergillus, rice and cereal products have some relative contamination from the beginning.
The presence of spores and their propagation during transport and storage of grains or contamination of the storage environment with these fungi can lead to the spread of contamination. As Magnussen & Parsi (2013) found out, drought stress is one of the factors increasing the susceptibility of plants to Aspergillus and as a result of aflatoxin infection (18), the results of this study also suggest that the rate of these fungi can be increased with high heat conditions and increased storage time.
By stage of infection, mycotoxins are “field mycotoxins” produced mainly by Fusarium species and “Mycotoxins in storage”, which are produced by Aspergillus and Penicillium species in the pre-harvest period or immediately after harvest during storage (19,20).
The growth of fungi and the accumulation of mycotoxins in food and feed are influenced by various factors which in general relative humidity and temperature are critical factors in the drying and storage period (21). Findings from the study of the amount and type of cereal mycotoxins imported from Imam Khomeini port, mainly from South American countries, showed that the contaminations were not nearly acceptable by Iranian national standard, and corn samples showed the highest levels of mycotoxins, especially aflatoxins. The findings of a study by Mazaheri et al. (2018) also confirmed that corn is most susceptible to mycotoxins, especially aflatoxins (22). The findings of this study indicate that the maximum concentration of mycotoxins is in September and November. These results illustrate the impact of the duration of storage of grain in shipments or in warehouses. This is confirmed by Najafian et al. (2014) (25).
In a study, Ranjbar et al. (2010) showed that Aspergillus and Aflatoxin levels decrease in spring and summer and due to the use of stocked livestock feed and the lack of proper storage conditions, the rate of milk contamination with aflatoxin M1 increases in the autumn and winter. They stated that inappropriate storage, in addition to contaminating livestock feed with Aspergillus and subsequent aflatoxin production, also transmitted it to packaged milk (26).
Cano-Sancho et al. (2013) also stated that the presence of mycotoxins in food depends on many conditions such as season, weather (temperature, humidity), target area, harvesting method, storage and processing (27). Lahouar et al. (2015) studied the effect of temperature and incubation time on the growth rate of Aspergillus flavus and AFB1 production on sorghum seeds, and reported that the flavus isolate from Tanzanian sorghum has the ability to grow over a wide range of temperatures (15-37°C), however, aflatoxin production occurs at a lower temperature range (25-37°C) (28). Ghali et al. (2010) showed that the highest aflatoxin production occurred at 24°C but the highest flavus strain growth occurred at -35°C (19).
In this study, the presence of Aspergillus did not indicate the presence of aflatoxins and, conversely, the presence of aflatoxins was not a reason for the presence of Aspergillus.

 
 

Conclusion

Given the widespread presence of mycotoxins in foods and their harms, especially AFB1, which is a contaminant in food products, control of AFB1 contamination in foodstuffs requires monitoring different factors such as raw materials and food supply, food processing, finished products, and storage.


 

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Research Deputy of Khuzestan Agricultural Research Center and Parham Jonoub Company for their cooperation with this study.


 

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declared no conflict of interests.


 

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Medical Mycology
Received: 2019/10/8 | Accepted: 2020/02/6 | ePublished: 2020/02/11

References
1. Pleadin J, Vulic A, Persi N, Skrivanko M, Capek B, Cvetni Z. Aflatoxin B1 occurrence in maize sampled from Croatian farms and feed factories during 2013. Food Control. 2014; 40: 286-291 [DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.022]
2. Leslie, J. F., Bandyopadhyay, R. and Visconti, A.(Eds.). Mycotoxins: detection methods, management, public health and agricultural trade. 2008;CABI [DOI:10.1079/9781845930820.0000]
3. Alberts, J. F., Lilly, M., Rheeder, J. P., Burger, H. M., Shephard, G. S. and Gelderblom, W. C. A. Technological and community-based methods to reduce mycotoxin exposure. Food Control. 2017; 73: 101-109 [DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.05.029]
4. Abbas, H. K., Wilkinson, J. R., Zablotowicz, R. M., Accinelli, C., Abel, C. A., Bruns, H. A. and Weaver, M. A. Ecology of Aspergillus flavus, regulation of aflatoxin production, and management strategies to reduce aflatoxin contamination of corn. Toxin Reviews. 2009; 28(2-3): 142-153. [DOI:10.1080/15569540903081590]
5. Magnussen A, Parsi M.A. Aflatoxins, hepatocellular carcinoma and public health. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(10): 1508. [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i10.1508] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Jinap S, De Rijk TC, Arzandeh S, Kleijnen HC, Zomer P, Van der Weg G, Mol JG. Aflatoxin determination using in-line immunoaffinity chromatography in foods. Food Control. 2012; 26(1): 42-48. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.12.007]
7. Pitt, J. I.: Hocking, A. D. Fungi and food spoilage. New York: Springer; 2009; 519. P. 275-33. [DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-92207-2_8]
8. Samson, R. A., Visagie, C. M., Houbraken, J., Hong, S. B., Hubka, V., Klaassen, C. H. and Varga, J. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Studies in Mycology. 2014; 78: 141-173. [DOI:10.1016/j.simyco.2014.07.004] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Samson RA, Noonim P, Meijer M, Houbraken JA, Frisvad JC, Varga J. Diagnostic tools to identify black aspergilli. Studies in mycology. 2007;59:129-45. [DOI:10.3114/sim.2007.59.13] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Gupta VK (Ed). New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering: Aspergillus system properties and applications. Elsevier; 2016.
11. Mehrabi-Koushki, M. Bavarsad, M., Farrokhinejad, R., Jamshidi, J. and Alimohammadi, A. The comparison of ITS-rDNA and tef1α genomic regions for phylogenetic study of some Trichoderma Species. Iranian Journal of Plant Protection Science.2016; 47, 61-70. [ In Persian]
12. Raeder U. and Broda P. Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 1985;1: 17-20. [DOI:10.1111/j.1472-765X.1985.tb01479.x]
13. Nyongesa, B. W., Okoth, S. and Ayugi, V. Identification Key for Aspergillus Species Isolated from Maize and Soil of Nandi County, Kenya. Advances in Microbiology. 2015; 5(04): 205-229 [DOI:10.4236/aim.2015.54020]
14. Riba A, Bouras N, Mokrane S, Mathieu F, Lebrihi A, Sabaou N. Aspergillus section Flavi and aflatoxins in Algerian wheat and derived products. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2010; 48(10): 2772-2777 [DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2010.07.005] [PMID]
15. Gao, J., Liu, Z. and Yu, J. Identification of Aspergillus section Flavi in maize in northeastern China. Mycopathologia. 2007;164(2): 91-95. [DOI:10.1007/s11046-007-9029-4] [PMID]
16. Makun, H. A., Gbodi, T. A., Akanya, O. H., Salako, E. A. and Ogbadu, G. H. Fungi and some mycotoxins contaminating rice (Oryza sativa) in Niger state, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology. (2007);6(2):99-108
17. Amadi, J. E. and Adeniyi, D. O. Mycotoxin production by fungi isolated from stored grains. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009; 8(7):1219-1221
18. Magnussen A, Parsi M.A. Aflatoxins, hepatocellular carcinoma and public health. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(10): 1508. [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i10.1508] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Hassan ZU, Al-Thani RF, Migheli Q, Jaoua S. Detection of toxigenic mycobiota and mycotoxins in cereal feed market. Food Control. 2018; 84: 389-394. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.08.032]
20. 20- Reiter E.V, Vouk F, Bohm J, Razzazi-Fazeli E. Aflatoxins in rice - A limited survey of products marketed in Austria. Food Control. 2010; 21(7): 988-991. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.12.014]
21. Ghali, R., Khlifa, K. H., Ghorbel, H., Maaroufi, K. and Hedilli, A. Aflatoxin determination in commonly consumed foods in Tunisia. J Sci Food Agric. 2010; 90(14): 2347-2351. [DOI:10.1002/jsfa.4069] [PMID]
22. Mazaheri M, MahmoudiMaymand M. Investigation of Aflatoxins in Imported Animal Feeds in Iran. Iranian Journal of Toxicology. 2018;12(6):33-8.
23. Amanloo S, Rezaei Kahhka MR, Ramezani AA, Mir L (2014) .The Mycotoxin contamination of the imported consumer rice and its producing fungi in Zabol . Journal of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences. 12(1): 17-25. [In Persian] [DOI:10.29252/jmj.12.1.17]
24. Farahmandfar R, Rashidaei Abandansari S, Maghsoudlou E, Asnaashari M. Determination of mycotoxin contamination in imported wheat to Mazandaran province by high performance liquid chromatography. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 2018;11(1):15-24.
25. Najafian M. Comparison the level of Aflatoxin in different varieties of internal and imported rice in different collection seasons and effect of cooking methods on the level of toxins. 2014; 6(4): 328-336. [In Persian]
26. Ranjbar S, Noori M, Nazari R. Study of milk aflatoxin M1 and its relationship with feed fungi flora in Markazi Province. J Cell Tissue. 2010; 1(1): 9-18. [In Persian]
27. Cano-Sancho G, Sanchis V, Marin S, Ramos A.J. Occurrence and exposure assessment of aflatoxins in Catalonia (Spain). Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2013; 51: 188-193. [DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2012.09.032] [PMID]
28. Lahouar, A., Marin, S., Crespo-Sempere, A., Saïd, S. and Sanchis, V. Effects of temperature, water activity and incubation time on fungal growth and aflatoxin B1 production by toxinogenic Aspergillus flavus isolates on sorghum seeds. Revista Argentina de Microbiología. 2016; 48(1): 78-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.ram.2015.10.001] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Publisher: Farname Inc