year 16, Issue 6 (November - December 2022)                   Iran J Med Microbiol 2022, 16(6): 490-505 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rostamian M, Kadivarian S, Kooti S, Dashtbin S, Abiri R, Alvandi A. Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase in Gram Negative Bacteria Isolated from Kermanshah Medical Centers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Med Microbiol 2022; 16 (6) :490-505
URL: http://ijmm.ir/article-1-1691-en.html
1- Infectious Diseases Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
2- Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
3- Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Research Institute for Health Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
5- Medical Technology Research Center, Research Institute for Health Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran , ah_alvandi@kums.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 2382 kb]   (1109 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (3847 Views)
Full-Text:   (987 Views)
Introduction


Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermented gram-negative bacilli are the most important causes of nosocomial infections. Antimicrobial resistance among these bacteria is a serious global public health problem. One of the main reasons for treatment failure of nosocomial infections is the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes and the development of the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria. Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, the most important ESBL-producing organisms, are responsible for the majority of nosocomial infections (1, 2). These infectious agents become highly resistant to many antibiotics by producing the most common ESBL enzymes such as blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV (They cause the spread of multidrug-resistant strains) (3, 4). MDR resistance patterns of a bacteria are defined as follows: If a bacterium is insensitive to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial groups, it is considered an MDR bacterium. Despite efforts that have been made to control nosocomial infections, the mortality rate associated with ESBL-producing is still high worldwide (5). Many studies have been performed to determine the prevalence of ESBL-producing strains and genes in Iran. Therefore, due to the need for a comprehensive program and a complete registry, gathering published data as a meta-analysis could be helpful for a selection of antibiotic treatment strategies and policies (6, 7). Since no systematic review and meta-analysis study has been performed previously in Kermanshah province, we aimed to collect and analyze the data from all published articles about the prevalence of ESBL-positive gram-negative bacteria and the frequency of different ESBL genes in Kermanshah medical centers. Because the prevalence of ESBLs-producing genes plays a key role in creating a different pattern of antibiotic resistance in bacteria, knowing the prevalence of genes and screening for ESBL-producing bacteria can help implement a plan to control and treat threatening infections in the future. This helps to prevent the transmission and spread of antibiotic resistance genes as much as possible.

 

Materials and Methods

Search strategy and selection criteria

The data of this systematic review and meta-analysis study were collected from international and local databases, including EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, SID, and Magiran. The related keywords were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, ESBL, β-lactams resistance, antibiotic resistance, and Kermanshah alone or combined with "AND" and/or "OR" All published studies in the field were included without time restriction until 30-Mar-2022. To conduct the present study Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist for diagnostic test accuracy was considered (8).

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

Studies based on title, abstract, full text, and originality that corresponded to the study's purpose and had the study's desired characteristics were selected as eligible and entered into the study. Cohort studies, letters to editors, conferences, case reports, narrative or systematic reviews without proper data, and non-English articles were excluded.

Selection of studies and data gathering

The extracted data were checked as follows: name of the first author, year of publication, year of sample collection, medical center of sample collection, isolated bacteria, sample type, sample size, sample gender, phenotypic and genotypic methods, frequency of ESBL, multidrug resistance (MDR), Antibiotic resistance pattern, and frequency of ESBL genes.

Data statistical analysis

Using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis v2.2.064, meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. The prevalence of ESBL positive cases, MDR cases, ESBL genes, and antibiotic resistance were presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with the random-effects model. A subgroup analysis was performed based on the sampling years to assess the source of heterogeneity. I2 statistics and the Cochrane Q test were used to measure the studies' heterogeneity. Regarding the asymmetrical data distribution, Egger's test was used to assess potential publication bias. The P-value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered the significance threshold.

 
 

Results

Literature search

In total, 925 relevant studies were collected by accurately searching databases using the appropriate keywords. Duplicate reports (182 articles) were removed, and the remaining 743 articles were reviewed. Based on the title/abstract, 322 articles were reviewed, and 53 relevant articles were evaluated by reading the full text. Finally, 23 studies were recognized as eligible for qualitative analysis and meta-analysis. PRISMA flow diagram of study selection is depicted in Figure 1 and the specifications extracted from the studies are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of study selection 
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of study selection

 
Table 1. Studies characteristics

Authors Published
year
Sampling year Sampling place Sample type (bacteria) Sample size Samples include (No, %) Male (No, %) Female (No, %) Phenotype method Genotype method Positive ESBL No. MDR isolates No. ESBL-producers MDR isolates No. Reference
Akya et al.-1 2019 2014-2015 Clinic University of Medical Sciences, Central Laboratory E. coli 240 Urine (n = 240, 100%) 25 (10.4%) 215 (89.6%) DDT, DDCT PCR 67 96 N/A (52)
Akya et al.-2 2018 2012-2013 Imam Khomeini hospital, Taleghani hospital, Imam Reza hospital K. pneumoniae 100 Urine (n = 54, 54%), Burn (n = 15, 15%), Respiratory tract secretions (n = 15, 15%), Others (blood, wound, and ascetic fluid) (n = 16, 16%) 41 (41%) 59 (59%) DDT, DDCT PCR 40 56 40 (53)
Akya et al.-3 2015 2013-2014 Imam Reza hospital C. freundii 60 Urine (n = 39, 55.7%), Stool (n = 16, 22.9%), Sputum (n = 8, 11.4%), Wound (n = 5, 7.1%), Blood (n = 2, 2.9%) 28 (40%) 42 (60%) DDT, DDCT PCR 5 N/A N/A  
(54)
C. koseri 6 0
C. braakii 4 0
Akya et al.-4 2017 2014-2015 Imam Khomeini hospital, Taleghani hospital, Imam Reza hospital, Central laboratory K. pneumoniae 100 Urine (n = 58, 58%), Burn (n = 16, 16%), Tracheal (n = 14, 14%), Blood (n = 5, 5%), Ascites fluid (n = 3, 3%), Wound (n = 2, 2%), Burn dressing bed (n = 1, 1%), Cot (n = 1, 1%) 39 (39%) 59 (59%) DDT, DDCT PCR 40 N/A N/A (55)
Azizi et al. 2017 2016 Imam Reza hospital A. baumannii 80 Tracheal (n = 31, 38.75%), Urine (n = 13, 16.25%), Blood (n = 10, 12.5%), Sputum (n = 9, 11.25%), Catheter (n = 8, 10%), Wound (n = 5, 6.25%), CSF (n = 2, 2.5%), Pleural Fluid (n = 2, 2.5%) 43 (53.8%) 37 (46.2%) DDT, DDCT PCR 43 50 N/A (56)
Davodian et al.-1 2015 2009-2011 Imam Khomeini hospital P. aeruginosa N/A Wound (N/A) N/A N/A DDT, DDCT PCR 8 N/A N/A (57)
Davodian et al.-2 2016 2009-2011 N/A P. aeruginosa 10 N/A N/A N/A DDCT PCR 0 N/A N/A (58)
Haidari et al. 2015 2013-2014 Imam Khomeini
Taleghani
Imam Reza
P. aeruginosa 60 Urine (n = 9, 15%), Burn (n = 32, 53.3%), Sputum (n= 10, 16.1%), Others (blood, wound, catheter and vaginal) (n= 9, 15%) 31 (51.7%) 29 (48.3%) DDT PCR N/A 42 N/A (59)
Hemmati et al. 2019 2017 N/A E. cloacae 93 Urine (n= 31, 33.4%), Wound (n= 18, 19.3%), Blood (n= 16, 17.2%), Trachea (n= 9, 9.7%), Sputum (n=7, 7.5%), CSF (n= 5, 5.4%), BAL (n= 4, 4.3%), Catheter (n= 3, 3.2%) 57 (61.3%) 36 (38.7%) DDCT PCR 55 65 N/A (60)
Khodadoost et al. 2013 2011-2012 Clinic University of Medical Sciences E. coli 140 Urine (n= 140, 100%) 15 (10.7%) 125 (89.3%) DDT, DDCT PCR 34 55 N/A (61)
Mohajeri et al.-1 2014 2011-2013 N/A E. coli 200 Urine (n=200, 100%) N/A N/A DDT, DDCT PCR 44 N/A N/A (62)
Mohajeri et al.-2 2018 2015-2016 Central laboratory K. pneumoniae 50 Urine (n=50, 100%) 16 (32%) 34 (68%) DDT, DDCT PCR 17 35 13 (63)
Ranjbar et al. 2019 2016-2018 Imam Khomeini hospital A. baumannii 35 Burn wound (n = 35, 100%) N/A N/A DDT, DDST PCR 19 N/A N/A (64)
Sarshar et al. 2016 2014 N/A K. pneumoniae 60 Urine (n = 32, 53.3%), Burn (n = 8, 13.3%), Tracheal (n= 10, 16.6%), Blood (n = 5, 8.3%), Wound (n = 3, 5%), Bandage (n = 1, 1.6%), Cot (n = 1, 1.6%) N/A N/A DDT, DDCT PCR 27 27 N/A (65)
Sarvazad et al. 2017 2016 N/A K. pneumoniae 97 N/A N/A N/A DDT Multiplex-PCR N/A N/A N/A (66)
Vaziri et al. 2017 2016-2017 Imam Reza hospital K. pneumoniae 57 Endotracheal tube (n= 384, 100%) 36 (63.2%) 21 (36.8%) DDT, DDCT PCR 22 N/A N/A (67)
Yousefi-Fatmesari et al. 2017 2016 Mohammad Kermanshahi hospital E. coli 95 Urine (n = 95, 100%) 53 (55.8%) 42 (44.2%) DDT, DDCT PCR 24 N/A N/A (68)
Mohajeri et al.-3 2013 2010-2011 Imam Reza hospital, Taleghani hospital, Imam Khomeini hospital A. baumannii 104 Sputum (n = 69, 66.3%), Blood (n = 32, 30.7%), Urine (n = 3, 2.8%) N/A N/A DDT, DDST PCR N/A N/A 34 (69)
Akya et al.-5 2015 2013 Imam Reza hospital C. freundiii 77 N/A N/A N/A DDT, MHT PCR N/A N/A N/A (70)
C. koseri 13
C. braakii 9
CC C. youngae 1
Zare et al. 2015 2012-2013 Imam Khomeini hospital, Taleghani hospital, Imam Reza hospital, Central laboratory K. pneumoniae 60 Urine (n = 38, 63.33%), Burn (n = 8, 13.33%), Respiratory tract secretions (n = 5, 8.33%), Blood (n = 3, 5%), Wound (n =4, 6.67%), Sputum (n = 2, 3.33%) N/A N/A DDT, MHT PCR N/A N/A N/A (71)
Norozi et al. 2014 2011-2013 N/A A. baumannii 84 Sputum (n= 55, 65.48%), Blood (n= 27, 32.14%), Urine (n= 2, 2.38%) N/A N/A DDT, DDST PCR 34 40 N/A (72)
Mohajeri et al.-4 2015 2010-2011 N/A A. baumannii 42 Sputum (n= 36, 85.7%), Blood (n= 6, 14.3%) 29 13 DDT PCR N/A 42 N/A (73)
Mohajeri et al.-5 2017 2011-2013 N/A A. baumannii 75 N/A N/A N/A DDT PCR N/A 37 N/A (74)

*- The details of resistance genes and antibiotics susceptibility have been represented in Table 5.
Abbreviations: E. coli: Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae: Klebsiella pneumoniae, C. freundii: Citrobacter freundii, C. koseri: Citrobacter koseri, C. braakii: Citrobacter braakii, A. baumannii: Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. cloacae: Enterobacter cloacae, CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid, BAL: Bronchoalveolar lavage, DDT: disk confirmatory test, DDCT: Double-disk confirmatory test, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, MDR: multidrug-resistant, N/A: not available

 

The prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers

To estimate the prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers, Iran, the proportion of ESBL-positive cases over sample size (i.e., event rate) was applied as effect size. The calculated event rates were multiplied by 100 for easier representation of data in the tables and the text. Fifteen studies were applied for meta-analysis, in which the pooled prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers was 34.8 % (CI 95%: 28.0 – 42.3) (Figure 2). Since the CIs of the summary effect did not include zero, the null hypothesis was rejected, indicating a positive prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers. Also, the Q-value was significantly higher than the degrees of freedom (the number of studies minus 1) (P=0.000), showing significant between-studies heterogeneity. The I2 test showed 85.44 % of true variances in the observed effects (Fig. 2).

Subgroup analysis of ESBL-positive bacteria prevalence based on the sampling year

To subgroup analysis of the ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers based on the studies published year were divided into two subgroups, D1 (<2015) and D2 (2015≤). According to these subgroups, six and seven studies were categorized as D1 and D2, respectively. The prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria was higher in D2, and there was significant heterogeneity between subgroups (Q-value: 6.347, P= 0.012) (Table 2). Table 2 shows that ESBL -positive bacteria prevalence in Kermanshah medical centers doubled after 2015.

 Figure 2. The pooled prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical center

Figure 2. The pooled prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical center


Table 2. The prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers based on sampling years

Group name Sampling year Number of studies Prevalence (%) Lower limit Upper limit Z-value p-value
D1 <2015 6 24.84 16.58 35.45 -4.27 0.000
D2 2015≤ 7 43.93 33.56 54.86 -1.09 0.276
Overall - 13 35.14 27.98 43.03 -3.62 0.000

Test of heterogeneity between subgroups: Q-value: 6.347, p-value: 0.012
 

Subgroup analysis of ESBL-positive prevalence based on the type of bacteria

Based on the type of bacteria, a subgroup analysis was done on the prevalence of ESBL-positive. The studies were divided into eight subgroups as follows: A. baumannii (3 records), C. braakii (1 study), C. freundii (1 study), C. koseri (1 study), E. cloacae (1 study), E. coli (4 studies), K. pneumoniae (5 studies), and P. aeruginosa (1 study). There was significant heterogeneity between subgroups (Q-value: 88.97, p-value: 0.000). The highest and lowest prevalence of ESBL-positive was observed for E. cloacae (59.14%) and P. aeruginosa (4.55%), respectively (Table 3). 


Table 3. The prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers is based on the type of bacteria

Group name Number of records Prevalence (%) Lower limit Upper limit Z-value p-value
A. baumannii 3 48.30 41.37 55.29 -0.48 0.634
C. braakii 1 10.00 0.59 67.36 -1.47 0.140
C. freundii 1 8.33 3.51 18.51 -5.13 0.000
C. koseri 1 7.14 0.43 57.72 -1.75 0.081
E. cloacae 1 59.14 48.91 68.64 1.75 0.080
E. coli 4 25.11 21.98 28.53 -12.28 0.000
K. pneumoniae 5 39.82 34.93 44.93 -3.86 0.000
P. aeruginosa 1 4.55 0.28 44.83 -2.10 0.035
Overall 17 34.72 32.17 37.37 -10.77 0.000

Test of heterogeneity between subgroups: Q-value: 88.97, p-value: 0.000
 

The prevalence of MDR bacteria and ESBL-producing MDR bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers

The proportion of MDR cases over sample size was used to estimate the prevalence of MDR bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers. The data of 11 studies were appropriate to be included in the meta-analysis, in which the pooled prevalence of MDR bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers was 56.1% (CI 95%: 47.5 – 64.4) (Fig 3). There was also significant heterogeneity between studies indicated by a Q-value higher than degrees of freedom (p-value= 0.000) and I2 equal to 84.04% (Fig 3). The ESBL-producing MDR bacteria were only reported in three studies in which the pooled prevalence was 34.5% (CI 95%: 28.8 – 40.6), but there was no significant heterogeneity between studies (Q-value= 3.06 I2 = 34.63%) (Fig 4).

  Figure 3. The pooled prevalence of MDR bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers
 Figure 3. The pooled prevalence of MDR bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers

 Figure 4. The pooled prevalence of ESBL-MDR bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers 
 Figure 4. The pooled prevalence of ESBL-MDR bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers

The prevalence of ESBL genes in bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers

The ESBL genes evaluated in at least two studies were included in a random-effects model subgroup analysis. Nineteen genes (or gene groups) were included (Table 4), in which a significant heterogeneity existed between subgroups (Q-value: 132.42, p-value: 0.000), and the highest and lowest prevalence were observed for blaOXA-51 (99.3%) and KPC (0.6%), respectively (Table 4). The details of all genes studied have been shown in Table S1.


 Table 4. The prevalence of ESBL genes in bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers based on bacteria

Gene Number of records Prevalence (%) Lower limit Upper limit Z-value P-value I2
blaCTX-M 13 20.2 13.5 29.1 -5.6 0.000 78.7
blaCTX-M-1 2 16.0 5.1 40.5 -2.6 0.011 91.7
blaCTX-M-2 2 1.4 0.3 6.9 -5.1 0.000 65.8
blaCTX-M-3 2 13.2 4.1 34.8 -2.9 0.003 88.2
blaOXA-23like 4 80.0 62.7 90.6 3.1 0.002 71.0
blaOXA-23like + blaOXA-24 like 2 20.7 7.2 46.7 -2.2 0.030 45.6
blaOXA-24 like 4 22.9 11.2 41.0 -2.8 0.005 9.7
blaOXA-51 3 99.3 95.8 99.9 5.3 0.000 0.0
blaOXA-58 3 0.7 0.1 4.2 -5.3 0.000 0.0
blaPER 2 4.2 0.9 17.9 -3.8 0.000 73.6
blaPER-1 2 23.4 6.1 58.8 -1.5 0.132 61.2
blaSHV 11 21.5 13.6 32.3 -4.6 0.000 95.3
blaTEM 11 15.1 9.6 23.0 -6.5 0.000 58.2
blaVEB-1 2 2.5 0.3 20.3 -3.1 0.002 0.0
KPC 2 0.6 0.1 5.8 -4.4 0.000 0.0
SHV+ TEM 3 18.7 7.6 38.9 -2.8 0.005 92.8
SHV+ TEM +blaCTX-M 3 17.6 7.0 37.8 -2.9 0.004 92.8
SHV+blaCTX-M 2 26.8 10.1 54.3 -1.7 0.095 0.0
TEM +blaCTX-M 4 14.8 6.5 30.4 -3.7 0.000 94.6
Overall 77 20.1 16.9 23.8 -12.6 0.000 91.6

Test of heterogeneity between subgroups: Q-value: 132.42, p-value: 0.000
 

The prevalence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers

For a random-effects model meta-analysis, the antibiotics reported in at least two studies were included. These antibiotics were Ampicillin (AMP), Ceftriaxone (CRO), Cefotaxime (CTX), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Aztreonam (ATM), Imipenem (IMI), Piperacillin (PIP), Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Gentamicin (GEN), Amikacin (AMK), Nitrofurantoin (NIT), Meropenem (MEM), Rifampin (RIF), Tetracycline (TET), Gatifloxacin (GAT), Colistin (CST), Polymyxin B (Poly-B), Levofloxacin (LVX), Minocycline (MIN), Mezlocillin (MEZ), Tobramycin (TOB), Tigecycline (TIG), Cefepime (FEP), Cefpodoxime (CPD), AMP-Sulbactam (AMP-SUL), Nalidixic acid (NALA), Piperacillin /tazobactam (TZP), Cefazolin (CFZ), Ertapenem (ETP), Cefixime (CFM) (Table 5). The analysis showed significant between-subgroups heterogeneity (Q-value: 197.62, p-value: 0.000). The highest and lowest resistance was estimated to be MEZ (92.2%) and TIG (4.2%), respectively (Table 5).

 

Table 5. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers

Antibiotics Number of records Prevalence (%) Lower limit Upper limit Z-value P-value I2
AMK 9 67.5 51.0 80.6 2.1 0.038 88.9
AMP 9 86.0 73.9 93.0 4.6 0.000 90.6
AMP-SUL 4 39.4 19.0 64.3 -0.8 0.409 90.6
ATM 8 39.3 24.0 56.9 -1.2 0.232 91.0
CAZ 16 60.6 47.7 72.1 1.6 0.107 94.1
CFM 2 68.3 34.2 90.0 1.1 0.289 0.0
CFZ 4 85.7 66.7 94.8 3.2 0.001 89.3
CIP 13 57.5 43.1 70.7 1.0 0.306 93.7
CPD 9 67.6 50.6 80.9 2.0 0.042 91.3
CRO 13 64.2 49.3 76.8 1.9 0.061 93.7
CST 6 17.7 7.9 35.3 -3.2 0.001 91.5
CTX 14 67.4 54.0 78.5 2.5 0.012 94.6
ETP 4 5.4 1.7 15.7 -4.7 0.000 65.2
FEP 8 72.7 55.7 84.9 2.6 0.011 90.3
GAT 4 63.3 38.3 82.7 1.0 0.296 76.1
GEN 13 45.6 32.1 59.7 -0.6 0.541 95.2
IMI 15 37.0 24.7 51.2 -1.8 0.072 96.3
LVX 6 77.3 59.6 88.8 2.9 0.004 57.2
MEM 10 51.0 34.2 67.6 0.1 0.908 95.6
MEZ 4 92.2 79.0 97.4 4.2 0.000 60.8
MIN 4 26.3 11.4 49.7 -2.0 0.048 0.0
NALA 3 65.7 37.3 86.1 1.1 0.276 82.9
NIT 3 39.3 16.6 67.8 -0.7 0.469 95.5
PIP 5 84.4 67.0 93.5 3.4 0.001 79.8
Poly-B 5 15.3 6.7 31.4 -3.6 0.000 0.0
RIF 3 91.4 75.1 97.4 3.7 0.000 0.0
SXT 11 56.1 41.0 70.2 0.8 0.428 87.4
TET 6 73.4 54.3 86.5 2.4 0.018 82.1
TIG 4 4.2 1.4 12.1 -5.3 0.000 0.0
TOB 10 44.0 29.3 59.8 -0.7 0.457 90.3
TZP 6 34.1 18.0 54.8 -1.5 0.129 94.8
Overall 231 55.6 52.2 59.0 3.2 0.002 94.2

   Test of heterogeneity between subgroups: Q-value: 197.62, p-value: 0.000
Abbreviations: Ampicillin (AMP), Ceftriaxone (CRO), Cefotaxime (CTX), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Aztreonam (ATM), Imipenem (IMI), Piperacillin (PIP), Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Gentamicin (GEN), Amikacine (AMK), Nitrofurantoin (NIT), Meropenem (MEM), Rifampin (RIF), Tetracycline (TET), Gatifloxacin (GAT), Colistin (CST), Polymyxin B (Poly-B), Levofloxacin (LVX), Minocycline (MIN), Mezlocillin (MEZ), Tobramycin (TOB), Tigecycline (TIG), Cefepime (FEP), Cefpodoxime (CPD), AMP-Sulbactam (AMP-SUL), Nalidixic acid (NALA), Piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), Cefazolin (CFZ), Ertapenem (ETP), Cefixime (CFM)

 

Publication bias

The prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria was applied for Egger's test to evaluate the potential publication bias. The test indicated no bias in the reports on the prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers (p-value=0.464).

 
 

Discussion

Despite many studies on the prevalence of ESBL-producing bacteria in various clinical specimens worldwide, the growing global trend of ESBL-producing bacteria indicates a lack of regular monitoring and implementation of appropriate control programs by health care systems (9-11). The first step in controlling resistant pathogens is identifying their prevalence and characteristics. In this regard, systematic review and meta-analysis studies will assist in estimating these parameters by collecting all relevant studies in this field. The present study was the first systematic review and meta-analysis of ESBL-producing gram-negative bacteria in various medical centers in Kermanshah. As our results showed, the pooled prevalence of ESBL-positive gram-negative bacteria in medical centers Kermanshah medical centers was 34.8 %, which is between the range reported for the global prevalence of ESBL-positive gram-negative bacteria (1.9% and 53%) (12). A systematic review and meta-analysis study estimated the prevalence of ESBL in gram-negative bacteria worldwide at 25% (13). The prevalence of ESBL has been reported from 45% in Africa to 3% in North America (13). As compared to other regions of Iran, the pooled prevalence of ESBL-positive gram-negative bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers was higher than the global level (13) and lower than in China (14), Nigeria (15), and Ethiopia (16).
Compared to other regions of the world, the pooled prevalence of ESBL-positive gram-negative bacteria in our study was lower than that was reported for Pakistan (17), Afghanistan (18), China (14), South-East Asia, and the African area (19), with the frequency of 40%, 51.9%, 46%, 37%, and 76% respectively. At the same time, it was higher than that was reported for Europe, the Americas, and the Eastern Mediterranean (19) with the frequency of 10.19%, 2%, and 5%. The differential in ESBL incidence in these studies might be explained by several factors, including differences in geographic location and socioeconomic condition (20), differences in the diagnostic methods, procedures, and performance (17), the studies aim (11), the availability of medications, and type of infection, species, and hospital/ward.
Our results also showed that the prevalence of ESBL-producing gram-negative bacteria in Kermanshah medical centers has been increasing in recent years, which is similar to the findings of meta-analysis studies in Ethiopia (19), Tunisia (21-24), and India (25). The increasing prevalence of these resistant strains is a cause for concern and emphasizes the need to pay more attention to care and control systems.
The appearance of ESBL-producing E. cloacae in clinical isolates poses a significant challenge to nosocomial infection treatment (26). Our study, the highest prevalence of ESBL-positive bacteria was observed for E. cloacae. In our study, Ali et al., found a high frequency of 79 % ESBL-producing E. cloacae among clinical isolates obtained from the Military Hospital in Rawalpindi (27). Similarly, according to a study done at the Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, 50% of E. cloacae strains were positive for ESBL (28). Also, the frequency of A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, and E. coli producing ESBL was high in our study, which is consistent with previous studies done in Iran (29, 30). In a comprehensive study in Iran, the prevalence of ESBL-positive E. coli was 89.8% (29). In a meta-analysis in Iran, the prevalence of ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae was estimated at 43.5% (31). Similarly, in some other parts of the world, including Ethiopia (32), Saudi Arabia (33), the United Arab Emirates (34), and Tunisia (35), the prevalence of ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae was higher than that was estimated in our study. The increasing prevalence of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains is worrying and requires implementing policies and regional/global efforts to reduce this ascending prevalence. 
Multidrug resistance (MDR) bacteria were found in 56.1 % of Kermanshah medical institutions (34.5% in ESBL-positive strains). In Iran, according to a meta-analysis study, the prevalence of MDR ranged from 32.8% in K. pneumoniae strains to 58% (32) in P. aeruginosa strains (36). In other regions of the world, the prevalence of MDR varies in a European study; it ranged from 0% in Estonia and Iceland to 49.4% in Romania (37). In Ethiopia, the total prevalence of MDR was 69.9% (38). The main reason for increasing and disseminating MDR strains is the unnecessary and excessive use of antibiotics that may lead to the acquisition of drug-resistance elements (39-41).
Understanding the diversity of ESBL-producing genes is important to identify the genes responsible for multi-resistance patterns (42). Our results showed that Ambler class D genes (blaOXA genes) were the most common ESBL genes, followed by Ambler class A gene. Similar to our results, Oliveira et al. found that the majority of isolates (96.5 %) were positive for blaOXA-51 in their investigation from two general hospitals in Brazil [26]. However, in contrast to our results, in some studies, blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and blaSHV (but not blaOXA) genes have been identified as the most common genes encoding ESBL (30, 43-46). The lowest prevalence was observed for KPC genes in our study (0.6%), similar to that reported by Yang et al., in a Chinese hospital that found a low prevalence of 2.9% for KPC-positive K. pneumonia (47). Differences in ESBL genes may be due to the differences in socioeconomic status, geographical areas, and the quality of diagnostic methods (48).
In our study, the highest resistance was estimated to be MEZ (92.2%). Following our study, the high resistance rates to MEZ (50%) were reported by Ozer et al. (49). Also, several more studies have revealed the high prevalence of resistance to MEZ in recent years (50, 51). This indicates that MEZ should be less used, and other alternative antibiotics should be used to treat the infections caused by ESBL-positive bacteria.
A limitation of our study is the low number of studies included, so only 15 studies were qualified to be included in which only three studies reported ESBL-producing MDR bacteria. In addition, ESBL genotypes were reported in only two studies. In the future, more studies are recommended to ensure the prevalence of ESBL-producing bacteria in Kermanshah.


 

Conclusion

Altogether, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of ESBL-positive and MDR bacteria is high in Kermanshah medical centers. It provides significant information to health policymakers to implement appropriate strategies to reduce the prevalence of resistant bacteria.

 

Acknowledgment

The authors of this article express their gratitude and appreciation to the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of the Kermanshah University of Medical Science.
 
 

Conflicts of Interest

Nothing to declare.

 

Funding

No funding.

 

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was done under the supervision of the Ethical Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (ethical code IR. KUMS. REC.1400.021).
 

 

Type of Study: Meta-analysis Article | Subject: Medical Bacteriology
Received: 2022/03/6 | Accepted: 2022/06/28 | ePublished: 2022/09/9

References
1. Breijyeh Z, Jubeh B, Karaman R. Resistance of gram-negative bacteria to current antibacterial agents and approaches to resolve it. Molecules. 2020;25(6):1340. [DOI:10.3390/molecules25061340] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Mehrad B, Clark NM, Zhanel GG, Lynch III JP. Antimicrobial resistance in hospital-acquired gram-negative bacterial infections. Chest. 2015;147(5):1413-21. [DOI:10.1378/chest.14-2171] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Peymani A, Naserpour-Farivar T, Zare E, Azarhoosh K. Distribution of blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M genes among ESBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolated from Qazvin and Tehran hospitals, Iran. J Prev Med Hyg. 2017;58(2):E155.
4. Pishtiwan AH, Khadija KM. Prevalence of blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M genes among ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolated from thalassemia patients in Erbil, Iraq. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2019;11(1). [DOI:10.4084/mjhid.2019.041] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Pana ZD, Zaoutis T. Treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLs) infections: what have we learned until now? F1000Research. 2018;7. [DOI:10.12688/f1000research.14822.1] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Pormohammad A, Nasiri MJ, Azimi T. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli strains simultaneously isolated from humans, animals, food, and the environment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:1181. [DOI:10.2147/IDR.S201324] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Barzegar S, Arzanlou M, Teimourpour A, Esmaelizad M, Yousefipour M, MohammadShahi J, et al. Prevalence of the Integrons and ESBL Genes in Multidrug-Resistant Strains of Escherichia coli Isolated from Urinary Tract Infections, Ardabil, Iran. Int J Med Microbiol. 2022;16(1):56-65. [DOI:10.30699/ijmm.16.1.56]
8. McInnes MD, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, Clifford T, et al. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. Jama. 2018;319(4):388-96. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.19163] [PMID]
9. Flokas ME, Karanika S, Alevizakos M, Mylonakis E. Prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in pediatric bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2017;12(1):e0171216. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171216] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Storberg V. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Africa-a non-systematic literature review of research published 2008-2012. Infect Ecol Epidemiology. 2014;4(1):20342. [DOI:10.3402/iee.v4.20342] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Flokas ME, Alevizakos M, Shehadeh F, Andreatos N, Mylonakis E. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae Colonization in Long-Term Care Facilities (LTCFs): A Systematic Review and Metaâ analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.08.003] [PMID]
12. Irek EO, Amupitan AA, Aboderin AO, Obadare TO. A systematic review of healthcare-associated infections in Africa: An antimicrobial resistance perspective. Afr J Lab Med. 2018;7(2):1-9. [DOI:10.4102/ajlm.v7i2.796] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Mansouri F, Sheibani H, Javedani Masroor M, Afsharian M. Extended‐spectrum beta‐lactamase (ESBL)‐producing Enterobacteriaceae and urinary tract infections in pregnant/postpartum women: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Clin Pract. 2019;73(12):e13422. [DOI:10.1111/ijcp.13422] [PMID]
14. Zhang J, Zheng B, Zhao L, Wei Z, Ji J, Li L, et al. Nationwide high prevalence of CTX-M and an increase of CTX-M-55 in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with community-onset infections in Chinese county hospitals. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14(1):1-10. [DOI:10.1186/s12879-014-0659-0] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Tanko N, Bolaji RO, Olayinka AT, Olayinka BO. A systematic review on the prevalence of extended-spectrum beta lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in Nigeria. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:488-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.jgar.2020.04.010] [PMID]
16. Tufa TB, Fuchs A, Tufa TB, Stötter L, Kaasch AJ, Feldt T, et al. High rate of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative infections and associated mortality in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):1-10. [DOI:10.1186/s13756-020-00782-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Abrar S, Hussain S, Khan RA, Ul Ain N, Haider H, Riaz S. Prevalence of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: first systematic meta-analysis report from Pakistan. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7(1):1-11. [DOI:10.1186/s13756-018-0309-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Tariq TM. Bacteriologic profile and antibiogram of blood culture isolates from a children's hospital in Kabul. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014;24(6):396-9.
19. Kiros T, Workineh L, Tiruneh T, Eyayu T, Damtie S, Belete D. Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Microbiol. 2021;2021. [DOI:10.1155/2021/6669778] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Livermore DM, Canton R, Gniadkowski M, Nordmann P, Rossolini GM, Arlet G, et al. CTX-M: changing the face of ESBLs in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(2):165-74. [DOI:10.1093/jac/dkl483] [PMID]
21. Ben Sallem R, Ben Slama K, Estepa V, Jouini A, Gharsa H, Klibi N, et al. Prevalence and characterisation of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli isolates in healthy volunteers in Tunisia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(7):1511-6. [DOI:10.1007/s10096-011-1471-z] [PMID]
22. Abbassi MS, Torres C, Achour W, Vinué L, Sáenz Y, Costa D, et al. Genetic characterisation of CTX-M-15-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli strains isolated from stem cell transplant patients in Tunisia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32(4):308-14. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.04.009] [PMID]
23. Dahmen S, Bettaieb D, Mansour W, Boujaafar N, Bouallegue O, Arlet G. Characterization and molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in a Tunisian University hospital. Microb Drug Resist. 2010;16(2):163-70. [DOI:10.1089/mdr.2009.0108] [PMID]
24. Elhani D, Bakir L, Aouni M, Passet V, Arlet G, Brisse S, et al. Molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains in a university hospital in Tunis, Tunisia, 1999-2005. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(2):157-64. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03057.x] [PMID]
25. Datta S, Wattal C, Goel N, Oberoi JK, Raveendran R, Prasad K. A ten year analysis of multidrug resistant blood stream infections caused by Escherichia coli & Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135(6):907.
26. Amin H, Zafar A, Ejaz H, Jameel N-u-A. Phenotypic characterization of ESBL producing Enterobacter cloacae among children. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(1):144. [DOI:10.12669/pjms.291.2385] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Ali A, Rafi S, Qureshi A. Frequency of extended spectrum beta lactamase producing gram negative bacilli among clinical isolates at clinical laboratories of Army Medical College, Rawalpindi. Rawalpindi PRO. 2004;2:25-9.
28. Jabeen K, Zafar A, Hasan R. Frequency and sensitivity pattern of extended spectrum beta lactamase producing isolates in a tertiary care hospital laboratory of Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2005;55(10):436.
29. Leylabadlo HE, Pourlak T, Aghazadeh M, Asgharzadeh M, Kafil HS. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing gram negative bacteria In Iran: A review. Afr J Infect Dis. 2017;11(2):39-53. [DOI:10.21010/ajid.v11i2.6] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Ghaderi RS, Yaghoubi A, Amirfakhrian R, Hashemy SI, Ghazvini K. The prevalence of genes encoding ESBL among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gene Reports. 2020;18:100562. [DOI:10.1016/j.genrep.2019.100562]
31. Beigverdi R, Jabalameli L, Jabalameli F, Emaneini M. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: First systematic review and meta-analysis from Iran. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;18:12-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.jgar.2019.01.020] [PMID]
32. Mohd Asri NA, Ahmad S, Mohamud R, Mohd Hanafi N, Mohd Zaidi NF, Irekeola AA, et al. Global prevalence of nosocomial multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antibiotics. 2021;10(12):1508. [DOI:10.3390/antibiotics10121508] [PMID] [PMCID]
33. Al-Agamy MH, Shibl AM, Tawfik AF. Prevalence and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29(4):253-7. [DOI:10.4103/0256-4947.55306] [PMID] [PMCID]
34. Alfaresi MS, Elkoush AA, Alshehhi HM, Abdulsalam AI. Molecular characterization and epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in the United Arab Emirates. Med Princ Pract. 2011;20(2):177-80. [DOI:10.1159/000319912] [PMID]
35. Dziri O, Dziri R, Maraoub A, Chouchani C. First report of SHV-148-Type ESBL and CMY-42-type AmpC β-lactamase in klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in Tunisia. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24(10):1483-8. [DOI:10.1089/mdr.2018.0073] [PMID]
36. Vaez H, Salehi-Abargouei A, Ghalehnoo ZR, Khademi F. Multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Iran: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Glob Infect Dis. 2018;10(4):212. [DOI:10.4103/jgid.jgid_113_17] [PMID] [PMCID]
37. Heuer O, Gunell M, Economopoulou A, Blomquist A, Brown D, Walton C, et al. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2010. Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) OH ed pp 30-31 Stockholm 2011 European Centre for Disease Prevention. 2010:30-1.
38. Moges F, Endris M, Belyhun Y, Worku W. Isolation and characterization of multiple drug resistance bacterial pathogens from waste water in hospital and non-hospital environments, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):1-6. [DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-7-215] [PMID] [PMCID]
39. Alp E, Leblebicioglu H, Doganay M, Voss A. Infection control practice in countries with limited resources. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2011;10(1):1-4. [DOI:10.1186/1476-0711-10-36] [PMID] [PMCID]
40. Ayari K, Bourouis A, Chihi H, Mahrouki S, Naas T, Belhadj O. Dissemination and genetic support of broad-spectrum beta-lactam-resistant Escherichia coli strain isolated from two Tunisian hospitals during 2004-2012. Afr Health Sci. 2017;17(2):346-55. [DOI:10.4314/ahs.v17i2.8] [PMID] [PMCID]
41. Alp E, Damani N. Healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units: epidemiology and infection control in low-to-middle income countries. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015;9(10). [DOI:10.3855/jidc.6832] [PMID]
42. Karanika S, Karantanos T, Arvanitis M, Grigoras C, Mylonakis E. Fecal colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and risk factors among healthy individuals: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Rev infect dis. 2016;63(3):310-8. [DOI:10.1093/cid/ciw283] [PMID]
43. Arsalane L, Zerouali K, Katfy K, Zouhair S. Molecular characterization of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in a university hospital in Morocco, North Africa. Afr J Urol. 2015;21(3):161-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.afju.2015.02.005]
44. To KK, Lo W-U, Chan JF, Tse H, Cheng VC, Ho P-L. Clinical outcome of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bacteremia in an area with high endemicity. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17(2):e120-e4. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.09.008] [PMID]
45. Ouedraogo A-S, Sanou M, Kissou A, Sanou S, Solaré H, Kaboré F, et al. High prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing enterobacteriaceae among clinical isolates in Burkina Faso. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12879-016-1655-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
46. Lukac PJ, Bonomo RA, Logan LK. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in children: old foe, emerging threat. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(9):1389-97. [DOI:10.1093/cid/civ020] [PMID] [PMCID]
47. Yang J, Ye L, Guo L, Zhao Q, Chen R, Luo Y, et al. A nosocomial outbreak of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Chinese hospital: dissemination of ST11 and emergence of ST37, ST392 and ST395. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(11):E509-E15. [DOI:10.1111/1469-0691.12275] [PMID]
48. Diriba K, Awulachew E, Gemede A, Anja A. The magnitude of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from clinical samples in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Access Microbiology. 2021;3(3). [DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000195] [PMID] [PMCID]
49. Ozer B, Duran N, Onlen Y, Savas L. Efflux pump genes and antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from lower respiratory tract infections acquired in an intensive care unit. J Antibiot. 2012;65(1):9-13. [DOI:10.1038/ja.2011.102] [PMID]
50. Fozouni L, Yaghoobpour M, Ahani Azari A. Probiotics in goat milk: a promising solution for management of drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Biomed J. 2019;7(2):31-8.
51. Pourshafie MR, Mousavi SF, Parzadeh M. Ribotipagem e perfil de resistência a antibióticos de Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolada no Irã. Braz J Microbiol. 2007;38:435-9. [DOI:10.1590/S1517-83822007000300010]
52. Akya A, Ahmadi M, Khodamoradi S, Rezaei MR, Karani N, Elahi A, et al. Prevalence of bla CTX-M, bla CTX-M-2, bla CTX-M-8, bla CTX-M-25 and bla CTX-M-3 Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection in Kermanshah City, Iran. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2019;13(8).
53. Akya A, Elahi A, Chegenelorestani R, Rezaee M. Dissemination of multidrug-resistant, class I and II integrons and molecular typing of CTX-M-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int j appl basic med res. 2018;8(2):100. [DOI:10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_333_16] [PMID] [PMCID]
54. Akya A, Jafari S, Ahmadi K, Elahi A. Frequency of blaCTX-M, blaTEM and blaSHV genes in Citrobacters isolated from Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah. J Maz Univ Med Sci. 2015;25(127):65-73.
55. Rezaei M. Phenotypic and Genotypic Assessment of ESBL Production in Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Kermanshah Medical Centers (Iran). Qom Univ Med Sc J. 2017;11(9):61-9.
56. Azizi M, Mortazavi SH, Etemadimajed M, Gheini S, Vaziri S, Alvandi A, et al. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-Lactamases and antibiotic resistance patterns in Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from clinical samples in Kermanshah, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2017;10(12):1-7. [DOI:10.5812/jjm.61522]
57. Davodian E, Sadeghifard N, Ghasemian A, Noorbakhsh S. Molecular detection of blaveb-1 beta-lactamase encoding gene among extended spectrum b-lactamase positive wound isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2015;3(4). [DOI:10.5812/pedinfect.26362]
58. Davodian E, Sadeghifard N, Ghasemian A, Noorbakhsh S. Presence of blaPER-1 and blaVEB-1 beta-lactamase genes among isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from South West of Iran. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2016;6(3):211-3. [DOI:10.1016/j.jegh.2016.02.002] [PMID] [PMCID]
59. Erfan H, Alisha A. The frequency of broad-spectrum beta-lactamase CTX-M genotypes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from Kermanshah hospitals (2013-14). J Kermanshah Univ Medical Sci. 2015;19(4):207-14.
60. Hemmati M, Vaziri S, Afsharian M, Mansouri F, Zamanian MH, Fereshteh S, et al. Molecular Investigation of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase and Patterns of Antibiotic Resistance in Enterobacter cloacae Isolates from Teaching Hospitals in Kermanshah, Iran. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2019;13(9). [DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2019/41823.13116]
61. Khodadoost M, Akya A, Ale Taha SM, Adabagher S. The frequency of antibiotic resistance and ctx-m gene in Escherichia coli isolated. Studies in Medical Sciences. 2013;24(5):318-28.
62. Mohajeri P, Rostami Z, Farahani A, Norozi B. Distribution of ESBL producing Uropathogenic Escherichia coli and carriage of selected [beta]-lactamase genes in Hospital and community isolates in west of Iran. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2014;7(5):219. [DOI:10.4103/1755-6783.154823]
63. Mohajeri P, Kavosi S, Esmailzadeh T, Farahani A, Dastranj M. Molecular characteristics of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in the West of Iran. Advances in Human Biology. 2018;8(3):175. [DOI:10.4103/AIHB.AIHB_20_18]
64. Ranjbar R, Farahani A. Study of genetic diversity, biofilm formation, and detection of Carbapenemase, MBL, ESBL, and tetracycline resistance genes in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from burn wound infections in Iran. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1):1-11. [DOI:10.1186/s13756-019-0612-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
65. Sarshar MHF, Akya A. The frequency of extended spectrum β-lactamase genes of SHV-2a, SHV-5 and SHV-12 in clinical isolates of klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from Kermanshah medical centers in 2014. Arak Med Univ J. 2016;19(2):59-67.
66. Sarvazad H, Darbouy M. Correlation of Antibiotic Resistance with SHV, CTX-M and TEM Extended-Spectrum Beta Lactamases Genes among Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Patients in Kermanshah Hospitals. J Ardabil Univ Medical Sci. 2017;17(3):353-62.
67. Vaziri S, Mansouri F, Abiri R, Alvandi A, Mortazavi SH, Ahmadi K, et al. Prevalence study of extended spectrum beta-lactamase in klebsiella pneumonia isolated from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in Kermanshah City, Iran. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2017;35(444):1113-9.
68. Yousefi-Fatmesari G, Hemmati M, Mortazavi S, Mansouri F, Azizi M, Etemadimajed M, et al. Frequency of blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV genes in Escherichia coli isolated from urine samples of children in Kermanshah city, Iran. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2017;35(430):551-7.
69. Mohajeri P, Farahani A, Feizabadi MM, Ketabi H, Abiri R, Najafi F. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiling and genomic diversity of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates: A study in western Iran. Iran J Microbiol. 2013;5(3):195.
70. Akya A, Jafari S, Ahmadi K, Elahi A. The Frequency of Carbapenemase Genes in Citrobacter Frundii and Citrobacter Koseri Isolated from Clinical Specimens in Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran. J Kerman Univ Medical Sci. 2015;22(6):629-38.
71. Zare A, Akya A, Nejat P. The frequency of blaVIM, blaIMP, blaKPC and blaNDM Carbapenemase genes in clinical isolates of Klebsiella Pneumoniae in Kermanshah medical centers. 2015.
72. Norozi B, Farahani A, Mohajeri P, Davoodabadi A. Molecular epidemiology of hospital acquired OXA-carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in Western Iran. Asian Pacific J Trop Dis. 2014;4:S803-S7. [DOI:10.1016/S2222-1808(14)60731-3]
73. Mohajeri P, Farahani A, Feizabadi M, Norozi B. Clonal evolution multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015;33(1):87-91. [DOI:10.4103/0255-0857.148390] [PMID]
74. Mohajeri P, Farahani A, Mehrabzadeh RS. Molecular characterization of multidrug resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from intensive care units in west of Iran. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(2):DC20. [DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2017/21156.9397] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Publisher: Farname Inc