year 16, Issue 2 (March - April 2022)                   Iran J Med Microbiol 2022, 16(2): 98-115 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kaur P, Sachan R S K, Karnwal A, Devgon I. A Review on Clinical Manifestation and Treatment Regimens of UTI in Diabetic Patients. Iran J Med Microbiol 2022; 16 (2) :98-115
URL: http://ijmm.ir/article-1-1408-en.html
1- Adesh Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India
2- Department of Microbiology, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
3- Department of Microbiology, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India , inderpaldevgun@gmail.com
Full-Text [PDF 833 kb]   (901 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1859 Views)
Full-Text:   (1386 Views)
Introduction


Diabetes mellitus is a heterogenic disorder altering metabolic abilities of the body, primarily characterized by persistently high glucose levels attenuating every bodily function. Recent epidemiological studies and analytical experimentation of patients with pre-existing diabetes mellitus have authenticated their plausibility of developing urinary tract infections (UTIs) that are potentially perilous with fatal mani-festations. Integrated data of various studies indicate that a total of 40.2% of patients develop UTI concu-rrently suffering from DM, with females holding 63.16% and males 36.84% prevalence (1). However, most recurrent recorded infections are ASB (Asymp-tomatic Bacteriuria), fungal cystitis, emphysematous cystitis, pyelonephritis, perinephric abscess, and renal papillary necrosis. Taking account of uropathogens most typically isolated ones are Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae, resistant strains of beta-lacta-mase Enterobacter, and Fungus species Candida (2). Assorted etiopathogenesis includes glycosuria, high HbA1c levels, neutrophil dysfunction, increased adherence to renal parenchymal cells, insufficient voiding, and impaired immunity that all provide a preferable environment for microbial growth (2). Critical treatment for prophylaxis and symptomatic infection is vital to avoid recurrence and complicat-ions. All aspects mentioned above will be schemat-ically considered in this review article.

1.1. Methodology

This retrospective observational study is aimed at schematically reviewing critically acclaimed articles regarding the susceptibility of diabetic patients to developing complicated UTIs. The data collected from numerous renowned journals was compiled to obtain a brief overview of epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, prevalence, complications, treatment, and critical management of severely affected patients.

1.2. Epidemiology

Innumerable epidemiological studies have concluded the incidence, distribution, and control factors contributing to UTIs occurrence in diabetic patients. In one study, 429 mid-stream urine samples were analyzed to isolate various urinary tract pathogens, out of which the majority were bacterial microorganisms (97.2%). The remaining infections were caused by fungi (2.8%). The most prevalent causative organism was Escherichia coli (39.3%), followed by Staphylococcus species (20.2%). Thirdly, Leuconostoc species (11.4%), Klebsiella spp. (8.4%), Salmonella typhimurium (6.3%), Dermacoccus nishino-miyaensis strain (6.3%), Citrobacter freundii (5.2%), and for the fungal ones, Candida krusei (2.7%) was the most common among the infected victims. While considering the gender, the majority of the infected subjects were female (71.7%). Observational studies point out the increased susceptibility of females to suffer from this ailment with concurrent risk factors and underlying conditions mentioned in the article, absent in the male population (3). In another urological study, 248 consecutive patients, all of them with diabetes, were observed and carefully moni-tored. Out of the given number of diabetic patients, 177 (71.4%) individuals didn't have any specified symptoms pointing towards the type of uropathogens involved, and 78 patients (28.6%) showed a clinical presentation of UTIs. The majority of patients were females (54.8%) out of the enrolled group, and the rest were males. The age group taken under consideration were adults, including geriatric patients ranging from (20 to 83 years). Two types of diabetes patients were diagnosed with type I diabetes mellitus (49.6%), and the remaining (50.4%) had the differential diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus. Around 90 people out of the total group had a history of diabetes for a decade. In regards to the uro-pathogenic strains isolated from grown cultures, E. coli was most prevalent (35.1%), followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CONS) (18.9%), Enterococcus spp. (16.2%), and Staphylococcus aureus (10.8%). Taking account of fungal causative organisms, more than half of the infections were caused by Candida (52.6%), and the rest (47.4%) were non-albicans. Infection was severe in symptomatic type (49.3%) rather than in asymptomatic people (11.9%) (4). UTIs are one of the epidemic infections in the United States, with annual complaints of 4 million women seeking treatment and being hospitalized. Around $2 billion are predicted as a liability to meet the expenditure of diagnosis and treatment of UTIs (5). With increased instances of antibiotic resistance among organisms globally, it's becoming a clinical catastrophe.

2. Etiopathogenesis of the Infection

Taking account of multitudinous risk factors and etiological agents solely responsible for the development of this condition along with the patho-genesis is crucial to trace back the infection and make the correct differential diagnosis. While enumerating the etiopathogenesis of UTIs, innumerable host mechanisms amalgamate simultaneously in genera-ting a vital response against the infiltrating pathogen and make collaborative efforts for its demise. Significant underlying mechanisms include the presence of glycosuria, the ineffective immune respo-nse generally regarded as neutrophil dysfunction, amplified adherence of uropathogens to epithelial cells, compromised innate, and acquired immunity alongside bowel bladder syndrome (6). Insulin is required in our body for the proper use of sugar by the cells. In the case of diabetic patients, elevation in sugar level in blood also results in an increase of sugar level in the patient's urine. Diabetic patients also have increased size of the pancreas or bowel bladder syndrome because urine retention in the bladder is more prone to have UTIs. Sugar in urine acts as a substrate for the bacteria causing urinary tract infection in a diabetic patient. Uropathogens further invade the urethra, and the bladder colonizes with the help of adhesins and pili on superficial umbrella cells generating immune response by deploying immunological cells, i.e., macrophages, neutrophils, phagocytes, and neutrophil infiltration (6). Supervised inflammatory responses are mediated by cytokines for further damage control. But some resistant strains of bacteria and toxins escape and multiply further by hijacking the immune system primarily by "Bio-film Formation," leading to epithelial cell damage by potent proteases and toxic enzymes induced by bacteria (7). Finally, they bridge the upper urinary tract and ascend to the kidneys entering the blood circulation, causing bacteremia (7). It is buttoned up with TLR5 and is of eminent significance about mounting an immune response against E. coli as depicted in lab rats (8). They variably adhere to the epithelial walls and access their mobility via fimbriae and pili as they possess a protein at the far end termed FimH (9) that facilitates host cell interaction and binds to pivotal enzyme uroplakin (UP) IA that skims the constituent cells of the bladder, which is decisive for colonization of Uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) (10). They also selectively attach to β-integrin, which initiates cytoskeleton rearrangement, which results in the invasion of infection to tissues (6). Secondly, the significant underlying fact to be considered in pathophysiology is enhanced adherence of causative agents with uroepithelial cells. The uroepithelium works as an interface between tissue space and inner lining and acts as a selective barrier against osmotic flux by ions, water, and solute. It further influences urine formation by acting as a sensory web with constant to and for information of external milieu. This adjacent system alongside governs a dynamic control over endocytosis as well as exocytosis across the urinary tract, both upper and lower regions, including prostate ducts (11). The bladder epithelium is also known as "transitional epithelium," having 3 consecutive layers, each serving a vital role in defense. These are named as innermost basal layer (measures up to 10 µm in diameter), middle cell layer (covers up to 20 µm), and the outermost surfaced apical layer constituting of major hexagonal shaped cells with a diameter ranging from 25–250 µm approximately, officially known as "umbrella cells" (12). UPEC has lethal virulence factors, including adhesions, toxins, surface polysaccharides, flagella, iron acquisition system, which facilitates peri-urethral areas forming colonies residing as quiescent intracellular reservoirs (QIRs) that increase septicemia. They attach to the inner layers by damaging structural components and are themselves resistant to the scrutiny of immune attacks. They possess Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and FIM operons encode for type 1 pili and pap operons. These are responsible for putative virulence determinants having FimH and PapG domains on the distal end, allowing copolymerization with the mucous layer. While the chaperon usher (CU) pathway assembles pili, the type 1 Pilus rod has FimH, FimG, FimF adaptor subunits that augment bacterial compliance (13). The immune system fends off to uropathogenic E. coli patterns via pathogen-associated molecular patterns; PAMPs or molecular fragments from infected or lysed cells danger-/damage-associated molecular patterns; DAMPs. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) identify these specific sequences with assistance from differentiated immunological cells, epithelium associated cells, and subsequent tissues and mount an immunological response (14).
The alpha-hemolysin is closely linked with end-stage kidney failure and necrosis by inducing calcium influx in the proximal and distal tubule, therefore facilitating adhesion in the ureter wall and renal parenchymal cells amplifying colonization, causing urinary flow obstruction. Recently it was found to generate pro-inflammatory caspase1/caspase-4-induced apoptosis in epithelial origin cells of the urinary bladder, which develop consequent hyperplasia (15). The most circumstantial and crucial step to establishing recurrent infection and progression is achieved by overpowering the immune system, which can be regarded as due to altered poly-morphonuclear leukocyte function and facilitated adhesion, inefficient phagocytosis, and chemotaxis. The interaction bet-ween bacteria and a vast array of host defense has the goal of symbiosis, removal, or clearance of the pathogen either by biochemical (e.g., Oxidation), cytological (e.g., Phagocytes and macrophages), or biomechanical tactics comprising of exfoliation. PMNs, i.e., polymorphonuclear cells and phagocytes represent the first line of protection and are primarily recruited at invasion sites that neutralize the microbe with reactive oxygen species, degrading enzymes, or apoptosis (16). The bladder epithelium produces cytokines via TLR4 (Toll-like receptor 4) stimulation. Still, UPEC and Staphylococcus species have enhanced resistant mechanisms which can trick these cells as they suppress cytokine production by blocking stimulus and escape into the bloodstream either alive or in spores carrying the infection. The same was demonstrated by the observational study that reported similar confirmations that UPEC dampened the serum IL-6,8 levels while there was only a slight rise in IL-6 concentration in urine which is vital for exponential immune response as neutrophil prod-uction and IL-6,8 levels are closely co-related (17). The generated QIRs are not detected by immune cells and are not engulfed by phagocytic cells resulting in recurrent infection. The same was suggested by a study conducted for the role of the SulA mediated cell division pathogenic cycle of UPEC that implied filamentation is rate-limiting for bacterial arsenal against innate response and evasion of the immune-logical cascade (19). The fusiform vesicles (FVs) are specialized organelles equipped with readymade crystalline arrays of protein origin present in the umbrella cells delivered to the apical layer of umbrella cells. To gain access to epithelial cells, UPEC coor-dinates with superficial cells and exploits the volume regulating mechanism by initiating exocytosis phenomenon in vesicles right and facilitates bacteria's attachment.
Replication followed by internalization is rapid, leading to IBCs evolution and bio-film generated for extended resistance. Therefore, Lysosomal neutrali-zation interferes as encapsulated bacteria that were internalized protectively enclosed in Rab27b+ formed compartment-like structures that act as a barrier (20). Toll receptors quickly recognize intrusion and activate response tactics; furthermore, TLR4 enhances the inward movement of secondary messenger (cAMP) that sets off the expulsion procedure of RAB27b+ vesicles shielding E. coli and forces the bacteria to be expelled out intracellularly towards the bladder. Despite this phenomenon, some strains still escape the encapsulated vacuole and are decamped from urinary expulsion; these leftover pathogenic fragments are further tackled by self-consumption and are carried to suicidal bags. The lysosomal transient receptor mucolipin 3 Ca2+ channel (TRPML3) is predominantly opted out, causing rapid calcium influx, which induces spontaneous expulsion of potent lysosomal enzymes. Intruder sensitive TLR4 receptors triggers the formation of specialized resolvable antimicrobial chemicals (AMP, sub-categorized into cathelicidin and β-defensin), antibacterial amino acid chains [such as pentraxin3 (PTX3)] (21), and chemokine signals [such as CXC-chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) and CC-chemokine ligand 5 (CCR5)]. More-over, a mannose glycoprotein uromodulin strives a shielding effect against the infection by competitive inhibition when UPEC FimH binds to uroplakin.
The data presented in the critically acclaimed study provided convincing numbers in favor of filament-tation, assisted by SulA, an imperative part of the immunlogical cascade against E. coli which is predominantly immune-competent with the host. The UPEC transition from the primary to the second generation of IBC is assisted by SulA- mediated inhibitory action on cell division and restoring cell competence. The given observation is primarily relevant to the fact that a steep decrease in CFU post one day of infection is seen. The recorded duration is required for secondary IBC formation (22). After mass destruction by defense mechanisms, equilibrium maintenance is critical, and to do the same, progenitor mast cells are appointed to restore superficial bladder epithelial cells (23). Eventually, exfoliation is triggered by caspase bound infected cells with subtypes involved, caspase 3 and 8 for apoptosis and consecutive shedding of bladder lumen. However, this process only eliminates bacteria's superficial propo-rtion, neglecting deeper tissue bacterial dissemin-ation. Strategically UPEC induces death of the uppermost bladder layer via potent virulent strains to gain access to underneath tissues to implant QIRs in sub-epithelium, which is multiple drug-resistant and further facilitates re-infection and prolonged host susceptibility (23). To defend tissue's integrity, direct phagocytosis is induced by neutrophils through intricate to and for cross signaling within LY6C− and LY6C+ macrophages, ensuring precise action. These native LY6C cells release CC-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), CXC-chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), and macro-phage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) to attract more polymorphonuclear from nearby arterial and vascular circulation (23). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) further commands immune cells to initiate CXCL2 manufacturing, which is accountable for spontaneous assembly of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) by neutrophils and commences transport to trans-epithelial (24). The resident LY6C− macrophages act as primary pro-inflammatory cells, in contrast to the recruited LY6C+ macrophages that maintain pathogen proximity (25).

2.1. Uropathogens Table Representing Different Microbial Isolation from UTI Patients

A wide spectrum of pathogens invades the genitourinary tract to develop a pathological ailment, causing a diversified set of infections commonly termed UTIs. According to a cross-sectional study conducted in St. Paul specialized hospital millennium college, Ethiopia, April-July 2015, 248 diabetic patients with the present complaint of either symptomatic or asymptomatic UTIs were critically examined and observed to get a detailed insight of spectra of uropathogens and their share in fostering UTIs. Clean-catch midstream urine samples were collected from each subject. The pathogen was identified using standardized laboratory techniques, and the data was recorded (Table 1).


Table 1. Different bacterial and fungal isolates from diabetic men and women having urinary tract infection.

Uropathogen Isolated Species Asymptomatic          UTI Symptomatic UTI Total
Isolated uropathogen Organisms Male         Female
%                %
Male%    Female%  
Bacterial E. coli 7.7 23.1 15.4 53.8 35.1
  CNS 28.6 14.2 28.6 28.6 18.9
  Enterococcus 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.2
  S. aureus 25 25 50 0 10.8
  K. pneumoniae 0 0 50 50 5.4
  P. mirabilis 50 0 50 0 5.4
  Enterobacter spp. 0 0 100 0 5.4
  Citrobacter spp. 100 0 0 0 2.7
Total   18.9 16.2 32.4 32.4 100
Fungus C. albicans 0 20 20 60 52.6
  Non albicans Candida 11.1 55.6 0 33.3 47.4
  TOTAL 5.3 36.8 1.50 47.4 100

The occurrence of microorganisms' fungal infection amongst diabetic patients has been recorded at 22.6%. The infection rate was considerably higher in symptomatic UTI patients (49.3%) than in asympto-matic UTI patients 11%. An overall percentage of diabetic patients (22.6%) had bacterial growth in their urine samples, and 7.7% were candiduric. Eight bacterial species were selectively isolated from positive urine cultures (Table 2). E. coli amount (35.1%) was found to be predominantly higher, followed by Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CONS) (18.9%), afterward Enterococcus spp. (16.2%), S. aureus (10.8%) and others were found in trace amounts. Out of 7.7% Candiduric positive samples, a large portion was accounted by (52.6%) Candida albicans and the remaining (47.4%) were non-albicans Candida spp. A significantly higher amount was seen in females compared to males due to earlier discussed pathological approaches (26).
Another authenticated study was carried out with similar results where UPEC shared the majority cascade in community-acquired UTIs and was found in 80– 90% specimens. In-vitro investigations concluded four major UPEC phylogroups (A, B1, B2, and D) based on the occurrence of Genomic Pathogenicity Islands (PAI) and the expression of causative virulent mainly being concluded as adhesive molecules, toxins, surface polysaccharides, flagella, and iron-acquisition systems. Besides that, Klebsiella pneumoniae contributed about 7%, Proteus mirabilis (5%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacter cloacae, Streptococcus bovis, and the fungus Candida albicans were found in variable quantities (27).


Table 2. Frequency of occurrence of urinary tract infection in different age groups

Socio-demographic characteristics Classification of variables Frequency
AGE 20-35 51
36-45 45
46-55 52
>56 100
SEX
 
Male 112
Female 136
Type of diabetes Type1 123
Type2 125
Duration of Diabetes <5 yrs 65
5-10 yrs 93
>10 yrs 90
Glucose level <126 mg/dL 99
>126 mg/dL 149
History of urinary infection Yes 73
No 175
History of antimicrobial therapy Yes 106
No 142

 

Table 2 examines numerous risk factors associated with UTI in people with diabetes, i.e., age, sex, type of diabetes, duration, glucose level, history of UTI, and antibiotic used for therapeutic outcomes. It's clearly stated that geriatric patients are the most affected due to acknowledged factors {100} furthermore, females {136} take a larger proportion of susceptibility as compared to masculine beings. Type 2 {125} and type 1 {123} patients are approximately at the equalized tendency of developing the infection in context to the duration of the same, prolonged suffering related to recurrent infections. Hyperglyc-emia {149} is predominant in UTIs and re-infection {73} as given in Table 2 (25).

3. Diagnosis and Pathogen Identification

Patients present with variable, potentially differential symptoms, while the case is associated with upper or lower genitourinary tract involvement. Typically, lower UTI is associated with frequent urination, a sense of urgency, dysuria, acute supra-pubic pain, while costovertebral angle pain alongside tenderness, recurring fever, and chills occur in upper UTI. Clinical symptoms differ with the type of compro-mised organ as well as in case of complications, e.g., peripheral or autonomic neuropathy, cystitis, pyelo-nephritis (26).

3.1. Diagnosis

3.1.1. Clinical
Includes accurate patient history regarding symptoms, onset, severity, diabetic profile, and severity at the time of presentation. Female patients require a proper physical assessment to evaluate urogenital anatomy and vaginal tissue estrogenization (27). Incidence of hypo or hyperglycemia is common with hyperosmolar dehydration or ketoacidosis in severe patients.
3.1.2. Laboratory Findings-
1. Midstream urine sample test:
Symptomatic patients' urine specimen is analyzed to get an insight into WBC's presence and the pathogen involved.
2. Pyuria detection:
It's a universal indicator of symptomatic infection evaluated with microscopy and is defined as >10 leukocytes/mm3 or by dipstick leukocyte esterase test (sensitivity of 75–96% and specificity of 94–98%) but doesn't differentiate with the type of bacteremia.
3. Colonization:
Negative pyuria in microscopical findings after assessment indicates bacterial colonization when a patient has bacteriuria and no typical findings (4).
4. Microscopic examination:
Allows bacterial visualization in urine and identify-cation of the strain present.
5. Dipstick:
A nitrite test is performed on a urine sample. The tests are positive when nitrite metabolizing bacteria are present in contrast to negative tests suggesting bacteriuria or bacterial species (mostly Gram-positive bacteria) incapable of nitrite conversion.
6. Urine culture: Crucial for correct treatment and therapeutic regimen, which involves obtaining a urine sample from clean-catch, and midstream urine followed by isolation and incubation. UTI is confirmed when culture is >105 colony, forming units per mL. This value shows high-grade sensitivity present in 50% (12).
7. Bacteriuria is declared if > 105 CFU/mL of a particular pathogen is isolated from a given voided urine sample. In the case of females with diabetes mellitus without long-term complications with known acute uncomplicated cystitis, quantitative counts < 105 CFU/mL are isolated from 20 to 250 Ä of premenopausal women and l00 Ä from postmeno-pausal women (28).
8. Diagnostic imaging- The amplified frequency of life-threatening complications of UTIs for obtaining diagnostic imaging along with accuracy and pathogen specificity (28). These patients present with systemic manifestations of the disease, marked with severe bacteremia or septic shock. Resistant or critical pati-ents who developed tolerance to appropriate antimi-crobial therapy within the crucial 48-72 hours' time frame, or the person experiencing a reoccurrence of infection along with symptoms just after abolishing the therapeutic regimen must be subjected to diagno-stic imaging mandatorily to identify underlying abnor-mallities for selective and compliant interventions (29).
3.1.3. Ultrasound and Intravenous Urography
Ultrasound and intravenous urography are previo-usly considered because they are safe, economical, and easy to perform with detection ability of calculi, obstruction, or an anatomical abnormality. Comput-erized tomography (CT) is regarded as the precise imaging model with high-grade recognition ability alongside modality for prognosis and follow-up of abnormalities. An enhanced CT is recommended, but contrast media should be selected cautiously in case of renal disease. Standard procedure indicates metformin should be discontinued on the test day with a close evaluation of GFR (30). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a limited but important role in renal diagnosis, applied for allergic and hypersensitive patients. Diabetic screening is utilized for females with cystoscopy or vaginal atrophy. People accompanied by risk factors are more susceptible, so the early prognosis is mandatory for prophylaxis (31). In patients with prolonged catheterization, preferred sample collection is done by freshly placed catheters instead of the previous one due to biofilm formation (32).
Differential diagnosis can recommend cervicitis, vaginitis, interstitial cystitis, prostatitis, hemorrhagic cystitis, and secondary ailment according to episodes of UTI symptoms, and precisely urine analysis is negative. Figure 1 illustrates the prognosis approach commonly employed for identification.

  Figure 1. Depicts Flow chart for stepwise diagnosis of urinary tract infection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (33) 
  Figure 1. Depicts Flow chart for stepwise diagnosis of urinary tract infection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (33)

 

3.2. Clinically Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

While considering clinically complicated UTIs' medical approach, disease characteristics and presentation are severe in terms of symptoms. A complex therapeutic regimen is employed for adequate management. The list given below covers the spectra of complicated UTIs-
1. Emphysematous pyelonephritis
2. Emphysematous pyelitis
3. Emphysematous cystitis
4. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis
5. Renal/ perirenal abscess
6. Renal papillary necrosis
3.2.1 Emphysematous Pyelonephritis
It's a rare inflammatory condition of the kidneys accompanied by chronic necrosis of bacterial origin forming gas in parenchymal surroundings due to uncontrolled diabetic UTIs infections confirmed in 90% of the diseased (34) found in diabetic patients. The condition is predominantly culminated in females as compared to males in ratio 6:1 concluded in an authenticated experimental study (35). Symptomatic patients present with the classical triad of fever, abdomen pain, and nausea. Complications are characterized by perinephric abscess extension, severe hydronephrosis, and rest with bilateral kidney impairment (36). Diagnostically, gas analysis is done for confirmation, and pathological findings indicate defective tissue perfusion, vascular thrombosis, glomerulosclerosis, hemorrhage of interstitial origin, atherosclerosis (hyaline type), microinfarction, severe diabetic nephropathy with lesions from inflammatory reactions (37). Management is preceded by antibi-otics; if the therapy doesn't generate desirable outcomes, PCD (Percutaneous catheter drainage) is performed alone or combined with antimicrobial therapy. The last possible treatment approach is direct nephrectomy (36).
3.2.2 Emphysematous Pyelitis
It's a disease characterized by severe tissue necrosis involving the parenchymal regions of the kidney with higher mortality rates in females than males. Its isolated gas production is confined to the collecting part of the excretory system and acts as a benign entity rather than a parenchymal region characterized  by emphysematous pyelonephritis. It belongs to the first class of EPN (also known as acute pyelonephritis) with poor glycemic control alongside urinary tract obstruction with low mortality (37). E. coli is the most prevalent causative agent, and differential diagnosis is made by computed tomography or radiological examinations. Clinical presentation is like EPN, i.e., fever, chills, dysuria, suprapubic pain, and tenderness (36). Radiological features highlight the presence of gas in the outer layers of ureters and pelvicalyceal, while posterior shadowing of high intensity is seen in obstructed spaces (38). Treatment options are quite like EPN already mentioned above.

3.2.3 Emphysematous cystitis

It's a distinct form of complicated UTI with exaggerated air production and entrapment of air pockets within the bladder wall and lumen. Predisposing factors include catheters, obstruction, or neurogenic bladders. Demographical data concludes that women are more dwelled towards the disease than men, i.e. (64% and 36%) (39). Patient complaints are summarized as hypochondrial pain, fever, vomiting, septic shock, and abdomen discomfort. Differential diagnosis is made with abdomen x-ray (84%), CT studies (40%), cystourethroscopy (39%) and ultrasonography (7%). More than half the percentage of the diseased were E. coli infected (40). Treatment is suggested with complex antibiotic combinations, strict glycemic control, and bladder drainage.

3.2.4 Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis

It's a chronic form of pyelonephritis portrayed by granulomatous abscess formation possessing a close resemblance with renal cell carcinoma with recurrent occurrences of pain and urosepsis. Microscopically these granulomas are lipid-derived entities; hence the Greek word "Xantho" means yellow (41). Diversified effects portfolio is mimicked with perinephric abscess, renal carbuncle, renal tuberculosis, sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma, leiomyosarcoma, megalocytic inters-titial nephritis. All symptomatic patients have a fever, flank pain, weight loss, hematuria, malaise, and anorexia (42). Urinary analysis reveals classic culprit E. coli and staghorn grossly defined hypertrophied mass in the renal region. Imaging studies and histological examinations via computed tomography demonstrate the form present either localized or diffused (43). Nephrectomy is usually the preferred treatment opted out by physicians. Patients with contraindicated surgical provisions are employed with broad-spectrum antibiotics and symptomatic management (44).
3.2.5 Renal/ Perirenal Abscess
It's a collection of suppurative material (pus-forming) in renal or perinephric space with insidious histology. It's probably a secondary manifestation of severe UTI infection and hematogenous spread. It proposes a diagnostic challenge as the condition is asymptomatic with generalized complaints of fever, chills, malaise, flank pain, intensifying the risk of mortality and morbidity (45). Intrarenal reflux at tips of open ducts of papillae demonstrates voiding alongside vesicoureteral reflux susceptible to scar formation, and further complexity leads to papillary necrosis and pyonephrosis. The histological description shows inflammation, edema, tubular necrosis with neutrophil infiltration caused by gram-negative species E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus (46). Diagnosis is established by tomographical imaging and is classified accordingly. Therapeutic management is carried out by nephrectomy and antibiotic treatment. Other approaches employ abscess aspiration and percutaneous drainage (47).

3.2.6 The Renal Papillary Necrosis

This form is marked with necrosis of renal papilla and lesions due to continuous ischemia progressed via pyelonephritis and synergy of numerous diseases, e.g., Analgesic nephropathy or diabetes mellitus, which hinders collecting ducts of kidneys and induces obstruction (48). Diminished circulation and obstruct-tion cause ischemia, followed by activation of an immunological cascade cultivating a series of respo-nses activating necrosis. Even chronic condition remains deceptive symptomatically and causes death due to renal failure and high-grade septicemia. Symptoms range from fever, cloudy urine, painful and dysfunctional voiding.
Diagnosis is made by cystoscopy, histological speci-mens, and ureteroscopy (49). Supportive treatment is employed via stenting, careful observation of the patient's hemodynamic status with aggressive glyce-mic control, and treatment of the consecutive underlying complication (50).

4 .Treatment Strategies

The desired patient-derived goals of treatment, as well as management, are crucial for mortality and morbidity. Expected outcomes include:
1. To eradicate the causative pathogen;
2. Prophylaxis as well as treatment of systemic consequences of the infection;
3. Prevent relapse or reoccurrence of infection;
4. Decrease the potential of collateral organ damage;
5. Rational drug therapy to minimize the consequence of resistance (51).
4.1 Stepwise Evaluation of the Patient includes:
1.. Selecting an appropriate antimicrobial agent concerning the severity of symptoms
2. Site of infection
3. Whether the presentation is complicated or uncomplicated
4. Antibiotic susceptibility
5. Side effect potential
6. Accurate medical history
7. Current antimicrobial exposure and susceptibility
8. Previous occurrences of UTI
9. Diabetic profile (with duration, medications, glycemic control)
10. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profile of the drug (52).
Considerations for rational therapy are essential for efficacy, and all the points mentioned above should be of utmost priority while formulating an individualized regimen. For standardized treatment, categorization of the type of infection into – acute uncomplicated cystitis, symptomatic abacteriuria, asymptomatic bacteriuria, systemic complications, recurrent occur-ence, or relapse of infection is of primary concern. Secondly, pathogen identification via laboratory techniques (urine analysis, gram staining, micro-scopical differentiation) should be obtained (Table 3). Thirdly, resistance and susceptibility of the pathogen against the given antimicrobial agent should be ruled out by following a rationalized approach. Based on established 2015 guidelines of the European Association of Urology, for efficient prophylaxis and relapse prevention, non-pharmacological and non-antibiotic measures should be predominantly employ-yed to prevent ADRs {adverse drug reactions} and delay resistance patterns to manage prolonged disease conditions (51, 52).

 

Table 3. Antimicrobial therapy for lower UTI in adults

  Antibiotic Dose Interval Duration
Uncomplicated Trimethoprim – sulphametoxazole 1 DS BD 3 days
  Nitrofurantoin monohydrate 100mg BD 5 days
  Fosfomycin 3g OD 1 day
  Ciprofloxacin 250mg BD 3 days
  Levofloxacin 250mg OD 3 days
  Amoxicillin clavunate 500mg TDS 7 days
         
Complicated Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 1 DS BD 7-10 days
  Ciprofloxacin 500mg BD 10 days
  Levofloxacin 250-750 mg OD 5-10 days
  Amoxicillin clavunate 500 mg TDS 7-10 days
         
Recurrent infection Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole ½ SS OD 6 Months
  Nitrofurantoin monohydrate 50 mg OD 6 Months
         
Acute pyelonephritis Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 1 DS BD 14 days
  Ciprofloxacin 500-1000 mg BD 14 days
  Levofloxacin 250-750 mg OD 10 days
  Amoxicillin clavulanate 500 mg TDS 14 days

DS- Double strength, SS- Single strength (53)

This dose-related antibiotic regimen is most prevalently employed to treat Lower tract urinary infections as E. coli remains susceptible to trime-thoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and the emergence of resistance is yet to be observed. Some drugs of fluoroquinolone class are also in practical usage, but significant exposure leads to resistance or therapy failure in case of prolonged use. In addition to these broad-spectrum cephalosporins are used, but they cause collateral destruction of the vital GI flora. Both Fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin have a less lethal effect on the gut flora, so they are somewhat safer alternates currently in use (54).
 

  Figure 2. Flow chart explaining different complications and treatment of Urinary tract infection

  Figure 2. Flow chart explaining different complications and treatment of Urinary tract infection

 

Figure 2 enlists the strategic flowchart and specimen collection options for a more efficient and sensitive way of documenting the diseased female under different clinical circumstances and serves as a reference criterion recommended for the standar-dized setting (54). UTI management in the male population is a little complex concerning females as the infections are of endogenous origin, disrupting urinary tract functions and requiring prolonged therapy if the urinary system is compromised further with catheterization, renal and urinary stones, or systemic complications are involved. Present patient history should be precisely recorded, followed by a urine culture. Antimicrobial agent employment should be based on the bacterial strain, and initial treatment should be for 2 weeks, i.e., a short course of therapy if no complications are foreseen. In case of structural abnormalities or obstruction is suspicious, parenteral antibiotics and the patient's hospitalization should be considered (Figure 3) (55).


Figure 3. Flowchart showing timeline from occurrence of disease to the follow-up diagnosis and treatment

Figure 3. Flowchart showing timeline from occurrence of disease to the follow-up diagnosis and treatment

 
4.2 Treatment

For the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis, which perceives through both the upper and lower urinary tract, a fair proportion of the condition is aided by E. coli and Staphylococcus, so relapse and preven-tion of inoculation in GI and the genital region is the goal. Monotherapy makes the use of Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole and Fluoroquinolone class drugs continued for three days. Recent studies suggest casualties in Fluoroquinolone usage; instead, it's replaced with nitrofurantoin for five days or Fosfomycin single dose as first-line therapy. In case of resistance or failure of a treatment switch to beta-lactams every week (56).


Table 4. Recommended strength and quality based on evidence generated trials Category/grade

Diagnosis Pathogen Treatment Duration Comments
Acute uncomplicated cystitis E. coli
 
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Nitrofurantoin
Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole
Fosfomycin
Fluoroquinolone
Beta-lactam
5 days
[A, I] 3 days [A, I]
OD
3 days [A, I]
3-7 days [A, I]
Short course therapy is more efficient. Beta lactams and fluoroquinolones should be used in severe cases as an alternative.
Pregnancy E. coli
 
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Amoxicillin clavulanate
Cephalosporin
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
7 days
 
7 days
7 days
Avoid these drugs in the third trimester.
Acute pyelonephritis
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Uncomplicated
The most common is E. coli, while others are Proteus, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
E. coli Gram-positive bacteria
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
For uncomplicated cases: oral cephalosporins or TMP-SMX
Complicated cases: intravenous (IV) antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam, fluoroquinolones, meropenem, and cefepime)
 
 
Quinolone
Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole
Amoxicillin
7-10 days
 
 
14 days
 
 
 
7-14 days
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7 days [A, I]
2 weeks [A, I]
 
2 weeks [A, I]
Management is crucial, and rationalized therapy can prevent resistance.
Complicated E. coli
P. mirabilis
K. pneumoniae
Enterococcus faecalis
Quinolone
Penicillin+ aminoglycoside
2 weeks Oral therapy should be for 2 weeks and then switch to parenteral depending on the severity and urine analysis.
Prostatitis E. coli
K. pneumoniae
Proteus spp.
P. aeruginosa
Quinolone
Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole
 
4-6 weeks both
 
If treatment is failed, switch to i/v.

Strength of Recommendation

A- Sufficient evidence to support prescription for or against;
B- Moderate safety data to support for or against the use;
C- Unsatisfactory evidence to support the use.

4.3 Quality of Evidence

I - Safety and efficacy data from more than one controlled trial;
II – Safety and efficacy data from a controlled trial via a case-control analytical approach from multiple centers;
III – Safety and efficacy data from authorities, clinically experienced opinions, and descriptive collaborative reports from experts.
Further symptomatic bacteriuria primarily seen in women can be treated with concomitant use of the antibiotics mentioned in Table 4 and case of acute pyelonephritis oral therapy ciprofloxacin (500 mg BD) for a week is suitable, loading dose or at the time of initiating the therapy, 400 mg dose of ciprofloxacin via I/V can be given to increase the probability of curing the patient to avoid hospitalization. The occurrence of resistance for community-acquired uropathogens can be overcome with the use of fluoroquinolones (A-I). If the resistant microbe further prevails, surpassing the fluoroquinolone regimen prolongs intravenous therapy of long-acting antimicrobials such as ceftriaxone (B-III) or an alternate 24-h dose of an aminoglycoside, is endorsed (B-III). To avoid compli-cations and hospitalization, oral fluoroquinolone (OD), with ciprofloxacin (1000 mg) for at least a week or levofloxacin (750 mg) or oral Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole with double strength should be prescribed for 2 weeks. Oral beta-lactam antibiotics are incompetent in pyelonephritis. As 75-95% of the fatalities are due to E. coli, individualized susceptibility and resistance patterns should be recorded before the initiation of therapy and antimicrobial selection concerning the recorded patterns (53).

4.4 Treatment of Re-infection

The instance of reoccurrence of the infection is often detected in female patients with complaints of cystitis, and numerous risk factors contribute to the ailment, e.g., self-administered therapy, resistant diabetes, post-coital therapy, irrational prophylaxis, so long-term therapy is administered with symp-tomatic management. Nitrofurantoin (50-100mg), Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SS), Fluoroquinolo-ne (500 mg daily) all are well tolerated and produce the desired effect (57).

4.5 Resistance Patterns

We can accurately trace back the emergence of resistance to many risk factors with epidemiological characteristics and the type of antimicrobial agent a given population is simultaneously indulged towards via direct or empirical therapy. Standardized literature and clinical trial data should be prioritized above clinical opinions and expert advice. Still, the above can be employed in case of scarcity of particular information concerning active medicament.


Table 5. Susceptibility pattern of gram-negative bacteria isolated from diabetic patients after urine analysis

Bacterial isolates Type APM AMC SXT GEN CPR CTX CPZ CRO NIT TOB AMK
E. coli (n=13) S 1 5 10 10 10 11 11 11 13 12 12
  R 12 8 3 3 3 2 2 2 0 1 1
K. pneumonia S 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2
n=2 R 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
P. mirabilis S 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
  R 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Enterobacter S 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
  R 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Citrobacter spp S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total S 3 9 15 15 16 18 17 18 19 19 19
  R 1 1 5 5 4 2 3 2 1 1 1

 

Abbreviations used above:
R – Resistant
S – Sensitive
AMC – Amoxicillin
SXT – Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole
GEN – Gentamicin
CPR – Ciprofloxacin
CTX – Cefotaxime
CPZ – Ceftazidime
NIT – Nitrofurantoin
APM – Amphetamine
CRO – Ceftriaxone
TOB – Tobramycin
AMK – Amikacin
 

Table 5 disputes the susceptibility patterns of the mentioned gram-negative strains of bacteria against drugs.
Despite advancements in the treatment and having a rainbow platter in terms of antibiotic selection, multiple drug resistance and therapy failure is the highest level of concern in the emerging infections as bacterial strains rapidly adapt and mount an over-enthusiastic response against human defense strategies. UPEC is resistible to approximately 11.8% of third-generation cephalosporins in European countries, and a double percentage of fluoroq-uinolones are rendered useless (58). In the United States of America, 31.3% of UPEC isolated from hospitalized patients are fluoroquinolone-resistant (59). Moreover, worldwide UPEC strains are resistant to TMP, and its use with a sulfonamide has proven to be an effective prophylactic agent (60). High circulating values of levofloxacin are insufficient to cure UTIs, while the combination of ceftolozane with tazobactam was more efficient as an alternate in fluoroquinolone resistant subjects (61). Variable resistant strains of UPEC against ampicillin (97%), tetracycline (86%), amikacin (72%), ciprofloxacin (68.5 %), and gentamycin (59.1%) were isolated in pregnant women with a compiled history of recurrent UTIs (62). Bacterial interference, both active and passive is a more revolutionized treatment that recently came under consideration in which less virulent strains of bacteria antagonize the bacterial pathogen during surface colonization and wrangle for limited nutritional supply Newly developed antibiotics, such as colistin, finafloxacin, and cefiderocol (S-649266), which are yet in the trial phase and are proceeding towards clinical development, might become a breakthrough in the treatment of UTIs (52). Despite continuous efforts to eradicate this ailment and provide everlasting immunity for prophylactic and therapeutic use, no potential vaccine is yet approved, with numerous target ones still competing in trials based on genome, transcription, and proteomic strategies employed (63). Currently, urovac, urova-xom, urvakol, and urostim are the names making the charts and have generated optimistic results in animal models, yet to progress in further trials (64). One study generated clinical data for target genes crucial for developing an efficient vaccine and also unraveled the four antigens, namely IreA, Hma, IutA, and FyuA that are to be targeted for a revolutionary formulation and also the need of the hour states the importance of research on adjuvants, route of administration and rationalized dose for an undefeated vaccine. Scientists are needed to develop a working combination of all these factors to generate a ray of hope for millions in disaster management of the infection called UTI (65).


 

Conclusion

OThe occurrence of UTI and high prevalence rate of ASB (Asymptomatic Bacteriuria) is very much common among type-I and II Diabetes Mellitus (DM) patients. However, the severity is seen more in patients without DM than in type II patients. Due to complex signs and symptoms, the treatment regimes should be offered more to such patients. The antibiotic treatment provided to diabetic patients should be thoroughly planned with proper dosage based on the severity. Further research or treatment should be focused on UTI analysis in type II DM patients.

 

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

 

Ethical Statements

Not applicable.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


 

Type of Study: Review Article | Subject: Medical Bacteriology
Received: 2021/07/30 | Accepted: 2022/01/14 | ePublished: 2022/02/10

References
1. Shah MA, Kassab YW, Anwar MF, Al Dahoul H¬K, Menon S, Kaur HJ, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of urinary tract infections among diabetic patients. Health Sci J. 2019; 13(2), 1-5.
2. Nitzan O, Elias M, Chazan B, Saliba W. Urinary tract infections in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: review of prevalence, diagnosis, and management. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes: Targets Ther. 2015; 8, 129. [DOI:10.2147/DMSO.S51792] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Seifu WD, Gebissa AD. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Uropathogens from cases of urinary tract infections (UTI) in Shashemene referral hospital, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18(1), 1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12879-017-2911-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Woldemariam HK, Geleta DA, Tulu KD, Aber NA, Legese MH, Fenta GM, et al. Common uropathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern among diabetic patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1), 1-10. [DOI:10.1186/s12879-018-3669-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Andersen-Nissen E, Hawn TR, Smith KD, et al. Cutting edge: Tlr5−/− mice are more susceptible to Escherichia coli urinary tract infection. J Immunol. 2007;78(8): 4717-20. [DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.4717] [PMID]
6. Prajapati AK. Urinary tract infection in diabetics. In Microbiology of Urinary Tract Infections-Microbial Agents and Predisposing Factors 2018 Nov 16 (Vol. 30, pp. 2-5). IntechOpen.
7. Raya S, Belbase A, Dhakal L, Govinda Prajapati K, Baidya R. In-vitro biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. BioMed Res Int. 2019. [DOI:10.1155/2019/1474578] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Acharya D, Sullivan MJ, Duell BL, Goh KG, Katupitiya L, Gosling D, et al. Rapid Bladder Interleukin-10 Synthesis in Response to Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Is Part of a Defense Strategy Triggered by the Major Bacterial Flagellar Filament FliC and Contingent on TLR5. Msphere. 2019 ;4(6):e00545-19. [DOI:10.1128/mSphere.00545-19] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Sarshar M, Behzadi P, Ambrosi C, Zagaglia C, Palamara AT, Scribano D. FimH and anti-adhesive therapeutics: A disarming strategy against uropathogens. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(7), 397. [DOI:10.3390/antibiotics9070397] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Liu Y, Shapiro E, Lepor H, Sun TT, Wu XR. MP23-05 Development of novel knock-in mice provides direct evidence that Uroplakin IA is the urothelial receptor for type 1-piliated uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC). J Urol. 2018; 199(4S), e283. [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.737]
11. Khandelwal P, Abraham SN, Apodaca G. Cell biology and physiology of the uroepithelium. Am J Physiol-Renal Physiol. 2009; 297(6), F1477-501. [DOI:10.1152/ajprenal.00327.2009] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Terlizzi ME, Gribaudo G, Maffei ME. UroPathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) infections: virulence factors, bladder responses, antibiotic, and non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8, 1566. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01566] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Hughes FM, Hill HM, Wood CM, Edmondson AT, Dumas A, Foo WC, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome mediates inflammation produced by bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol. 2016; 195(5), 1598-605. [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.068] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Nagamatsu K, Hannan TJ, Guest RL, Kostakioti M, Hadjifrangiskou M, Binkley J, et al. Dysregulation of Escherichia coli α-hemolysin expression alters the course of acute and persistent urinary tract infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015; 112(8), E871-80. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1500374112] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Hunstad DA, Justice SS. Intracellular lifestyles and immune evasion strategies of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2010; 64:203-21. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134258] [PMID]
16. Schwab S, Jobin K, Kurts C. Urinary tract infection: recent insight into the evolutionary arms race between uropathogenic Escherichia coli and our immune system. Nephro Dial Transplant. 2017; 32(12), 1977-83. [DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfx022] [PMID]
17. Ching CB, Gupta S, Li B, Cortado H, Mayne N, Jackson AR, et al. Interleukin-6/Stat3 signaling has an essential role in the host antimicrobial response to urinary tract infection. Kidney Int. 2018; 93(6), 1320-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.kint.2017.12.006] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Sun J, Deering RW, Peng Z, Najia L, Khoo C, Cohen PS, et al. Pectic Oligosaccharides from Cranberry Prevent Quiescence and Persistence in the Uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1), 1-9. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-56005-w] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Davis JM, Rasmussen SB, O'Brien AD. Cytotoxic necrotizing factor type 1 production by uropathogenic Escherichia coli modulates polymorphonuclear leukocyte function. Infect Immun. 2005; 73(9), 5301-10. [DOI:10.1128/IAI.73.9.5301-5310.2005] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Goller CC, Seed PC. Revisiting the Escherichia coli polysaccharide capsule as a virulence factor during urinary tract infection: contribution to intracellular biofilm development. Virulence. 2010; 1(4), 333-7. [DOI:10.4161/viru.1.4.12388] [PMID]
21. Lee JH, Subhadra B, Son YJ, Kim DH, Park HS, Kim JM, et al. Phylogenetic group distributions, virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance properties of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infections in South Korea. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2016; 62(1), 84-90. [DOI:10.1111/lam.12517] [PMID]
22. Maltby R, Leatham-Jensen MP, Gibson T, Cohen PS, Conway T. Nutritional basis for colonization resistance by human commensal Escherichia coli strains HS and Nissle 1917 against E. coli O157: H7 in the mouse intestine. PloS One. 2013; 8(1), e53957. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0053957] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Schiwon M, Weisheit C, Franken L, Gutweiler S, Dixit A, Meyer-Schwesinger C, et al. Crosstalk between sentinel and helper macrophages permits neutrophil migration into infected uroepithelium. Cell. 2014; 156(3), 456-68. [DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.006] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Hurst RE, Dozmorov M, Kyker KD, Saban R, Shankar N, Dozmorov I, Centola MB. A Distinct Program of Gene Expression by Urothelial Cells Follows Infection by Enterococcus. J Urol. 2006; 175(4S), 21. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(18)32328-0]
25. Abraham SN, Miao Y. The nature of immune responses to urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Immun 2015; 15(10), 655. [DOI:10.1038/nri3887] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Justice SS, Hunstad DA, Seed PC, Hultgren SJ. Filamentation by Escherichia coli subverts innate defenses during urinary tract infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006; 103(52), 19884-9. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0606329104] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Godaly G, Proudfoot AE, Offord RE, Svanborg C, Agace WW. Role of epithelial interleukin-8 (IL-8) and neutrophil IL-8 receptor A in Escherichia coli-induced transuroepithelial neutrophil migration. Infect Immun. 1997; 65(8), 3451-6. [DOI:10.1128/iai.65.8.3451-3456.1997] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Mysorekar IU, Hultgren SJ. Mechanisms of uropathogenic Escherichia coli persistence and eradication from the urinary tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(38):14170-5. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0602136103] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Little P, Turner S, Rumsby K, Warner G, Moore M, Lowes JA. Urinary tract infection: development and validation, randomised trial, economic analysis, observational cohort and qualitative study. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:19. [DOI:10.3310/hta13190] [PMID]
30. Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ: Mandell, douglas, and bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases: 2-volume set. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
31. Schmiemann G, Kniehl E, Gebhardt K, Matejczyk MM, Hummers-Pradier E. The diagnosis of urinary tract infection: a systematic review. Deutsch Ärztebl Int. 2010;107(21):361-7. [DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0361] [PMID]
32. Masters BR. (2016). Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, (2015) Eds: John E. Bennett, Raphael Dolin, Martin J. Blaser. ISBN: 13-978-1-4557-4801-3, Elsevier Saunders. [DOI:10.1007/s00417-015-2950-1]
33. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, Colgan R, Geerlings SE, Rice JC, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50(5), 625-63. [DOI:10.1086/650482] [PMID]
34. Pontin AR, Barnes RD. Current management of emphysematous pyelonephritis. Nat Rev Urol. 2009; 6(5), 272-9. [DOI:10.1038/nrurol.2009.51] [PMID]
35. Fünfstück R, Nicolle LE, Hanefeld M, Naber KG. Urinary tract infection in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Nephrol. 2012; 77(1), 40. [DOI:10.5414/CN107216] [PMID]
36. Misgar RA, Mubarik I, Wani AI, Bashir MI, Ramzan M, Laway BA. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: a 10-year experience with 26 cases. Indian J endocrinol Metab. 2016; 20(4), 475. [DOI:10.4103/2230-8210.183475] [PMID] [PMCID]
37. Wiesel S, Gutman A, Abraham JE, Kiroycheva M. Foley Follies: Emphysematous Pyelitis from Instrumentation in Obstructive Uropathy. Cureus. 2017; 9(8). [DOI:10.7759/cureus.1612]
38. Ajmera P, Krishnamurthy S, Joshi M, Ajmera L. CT as a Diagnostic Tool for Emphysematous Pyelitis: A Case Report. Cureus. 2021; 13(2). [DOI:10.7759/cureus.13513]
39. Chiang CC, Jong YS, Wang WJ. Emphysematous pyelitis. Cmaj. 2010; 182(7), 698-698. [DOI:10.1503/cmaj.091055] [PMID] [PMCID]
40. Kua CH, Aziz YA. Air in the kidney: between emphysematous pyelitis and pyelonephritis. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008; 4(4). [DOI:10.2349/biij.4.4.e24] [PMID] [PMCID]
41. Thomas AA, Lane BR, Thomas AZ, Remer EM, Campbell SC, Shoskes DA. Emphysematous cystitis: a review of 135 cases. BJU Int. 2007; 100(1), 17-20. [DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06930.x] [PMID]
42. Kundu R, Baliyan A, Dhingra H, Bhalla V, Punia RS. Clinicopathological spectrum of xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Indian J Nephrol. 2019; 29(2), 111. [DOI:10.4103/ijn.IJN_50_18] [PMID] [PMCID]
43. Ichaoui H, Saadi A, Chakroun M, Ayed H, Bouzouita A, Cherif M, et al. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in adults: clinical, biological, radiological and therapeutic main findings in diffuse and focal forms. About 42 cases. Tunis Med 2018; 96(8-9), 495-500.
44. Xie L, Tapiero S, Flores AR, Armas-Phan M, Limfueco L, Karani R, et al. Long-term antibiotic treatment prior to laparoscopic nephrectomy for Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis improves postoperative outcomes: results from a multicenter study. J Urol. 2021; 205(3), 820-5. [DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001429] [PMID]
45. Korkes F, Favoretto RL, Bróglio M, Silva CA, Castro MG, Perez MD. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: clinical experience with 41 cases. Urol 2008; 71(2), 178-180. [DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.026] [PMID]
46. Li L, Parwani AV. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011; 135(5), 671-4. [DOI:10.5858/2009-0769-RSR.1] [PMID]
47. Okafor CN, Onyeaso EE. Perinephric abscess. StatPearls 2020.
48. Kawaguchi Y, Mori H, Izumi Y, Ito M. Renal papillary necrosis with diabetes and urinary tract infection. Internal Med. 2018; 57(22), 3343. [DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.0858-18] [PMID] [PMCID]
49. Aguilar-García CR, Naranjo-Tadeo I. Emphysematous Pyelonephritis. Medicina Interna de Méx 2014; 30(2), 215-22.
50. Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, Wullt B, Colgan R, Miller LG, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: a 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52(5), e103-20. [DOI:10.1093/cid/ciq257] [PMID]
51. Olson RP, Harrell LJ, Kaye KS. Antibiotic resistance in urinary isolates of Escherichia coli from college women with urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53(3), 1285-6. [DOI:10.1128/AAC.01188-08] [PMID] [PMCID]
52. Vahlensieck W, Perepanova T, Johansen TEB, Tenke P, Naber KG, Wagenlehner FM. Management of uncomplicated recurrent urinary tract infections. Eur Urol Suppl. 2016; 15(4), 95-101. [DOI:10.1016/j.eursup.2016.04.007]
53. Talan DA, Krishnadasan A, Abrahamian FM, Stamm WE, Moran GJ, Emergency ID NET Study Group. Prevalence and risk factor analysis of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-and fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli infection among emergency department patients with pyelonephritis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47(9), 1150-8. [DOI:10.1086/592250] [PMID]
54. Nicolle LE, Bradley S, Colgan R, Rice JC, Schaeffer A, Hooton TM. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 643-54. [DOI:10.1086/427507] [PMID]
55. Kallen AJ, Welch HG, Sirovich BE. Current antibiotic therapy for isolated urinary tract infections in women. Arch Internal Med. 2006; 166(6), 635-9. [DOI:10.1001/archinte.166.6.635] [PMID]
56. Knottnerus BJ, Grigoryan L, Geerlings SE, Moll van Charante EP, Verheij TJ, Kessels AG, et al. Comparative effectiveness of antibiotics for uncomplicated urinary tract infections: network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Fam Pract. 2012; 29(6), 659-70. [DOI:10.1093/fampra/cms029] [PMID]
57. Kahlmeter G. An international survey of the antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens from uncomplicated urinary tract infections: the ECO SENS Project. J antimicrob Chemother. 2003; 51(1), 69-76. [DOI:10.1093/jac/dkg028] [PMID]
58. Lichtenberger P, Hooton TM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. Int J antimicrob Agents. 2011; 38, 36-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.005] [PMID]
59. Cai T, Verze P, Brugnolli A, Tiscione D, Luciani LG, Eccher C, et al. Adherence to European Association of Urology guidelines on prophylactic antibiotics: an important step in antimicrobial stewardship. Eur Urol. 2016; 69(2), 276-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.010] [PMID]
60. Edelsberg J, Weycker D, Barron R, Li X, Wu H, Oster G, et al. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in US hospitals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014; 78(3), 255-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.11.011] [PMID]
61. Neslihan İDİL, Candan ED, Rad AY. A Retrospective Study on Urinary Tract Infection Agents Isolated from Children and Their Antibiotic Susceptibility. Hacettepe J Bio Chem, 48(3), 265-74.
62. Huntington JA, Sakoulas G, Umeh O, Cloutier DJ, Steenbergen JN, Bliss C, et al. Efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by levofloxacin-resistant pathogens: results from the ASPECT-cUTI trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016; 71(7), 2014-21. [DOI:10.1093/jac/dkw053] [PMID]
63. Zacchè MM, Giarenis I. Therapies in early development for the treatment of urinary tract inflammation. Expert Opin Inv Drug. 2016; 25(5), 531-40. [DOI:10.1517/13543784.2016.1161024] [PMID]
64. Brumbaugh AR, Mobley HL. Preventing urinary tract infection: progress toward an effective Escherichia coli vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012; 11(6), 663-76. [DOI:10.1586/erv.12.36] [PMID] [PMCID]
65. Mobley HL, Alteri CJ. Development of a vaccine against Escherichia coli urinary tract infections. Pathogens. 2016; 5(1), 1. [DOI:10.3390/pathogens5010001] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Publisher: Farname Inc