Acinetobacter baumannii: Researchers' Scientific Cooperation Network in Three Decades

Danesh, Farshid; Ghavidel, Somayeh; Emami, Maryam

doi:10.30699/ijmm.14.3.252

year 14, Issue 3 (May - Jun 2020) Iran J Med Microbiol 2020, 14(3): 252-269 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.30699/ijmm.14.3.252

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Danesh F, Ghavidel S, Emami M. Acinetobacter baumannii: Researchers' Scientific Cooperation Network in Three Decades. Iran J Med Microbiol 2020; 14 (3) :252-269
URL: http://ijmm.ir/article-1-1165-en.html

Acinetobacter baumannii: Researchers' Scientific Cooperation Network in Three Decades

Farshid Danesh

¹, Somayeh Ghavidel²

, Maryam Emami²

1- Information Management Research Department, Regional Information Center for Science and Technology (RICeST), Shiraz, Iran , farshiddanesh@ricest.ac.ir
2- Department of knowledge and Information Science, School of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii, Co-citation analysis, Social network analysis, Scientometrics, Bibliometrics

Full-Text [PDF 1716 kb] (1607 Downloads) | Abstract (HTML) (6319 Views)

Full-Text: (1456 Views)

Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the most common and effective pathogens in causing serious ICU infections in modern hospital systems around the world (1- 5). This hospital pathogen has caused a wide range of infections, including Septicemia and Pneumonia, and has become a significant challenge in health care services, especially hospitals (3,6-8). A. baumannii researchers and specialists have always conducted extensive research in various fields due to the challenges, crises, and global impact of this pathogen.
Co-citation analysis is one of the scientometric techniques that is used as a method in analyzing the intellectual structure of scientists and their publications and identifying principal authors and publications in different areas of research (15,14). Due to the importance of the scientometrics study of A. baumannii's international publications, the main issue of this article is to visualize the scientific collaboration network and the citations of A. baumannii's researchers using the methods of co-citation analysis and social network analysis from 1990 to 2019. Conducting such research and its practical results will be of great help to researchers and planners of the healthcare system in the field of strategic and heuristic planning, as well as the implementation of programs at the level of medical sciences organizations and countries (20).
Therefore, it seems necessary to conduct practical, comprehensive, and analytical research in this regard. Visualizing the researchers of A. Baumannii's scientific collaboration network is the primary goal of this study.

Materials and Methods

The method used in this paper is co-citation analysis. The statistical population is all A. Baumannii indexed publications from 1990 to 2019 in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). A total of 4473 records were retrieved after an advanced search for "A. Baumannii" with the "TI" tag using Ravar PreMap, UCINET 6.528.0.0, and Netdraw 1.0.0.0 for preprocessing and analyzing the data .(18)

Results

The Growth Trend of Acinetobacter baumannii Publications
A. baumannii's number of Publications rose from 2 in 1990 to 475 in 2019. The data in Figure 1 showed that A. baumannii's publication trend has been growing in the last three decades.

Ranking of Acinetobacter baumannii's Top Journals Based on IF
The data in Table 1 showed that the best journal is "Clinical Infectious Diseases," with an impact factor of 9.05.

The Most Effective Acinetobacter baumannii Researchers
With 4365 citations, "Seifert, Harald" from Germany and affiliated with University Hospital of Cologne, ranked first among the most effective researchers in the A. Baumannii research domain (Table 2).

Figure 1. The growth trend of Acinetobacter baumannii's publication in WOSCC (1990 to 2019)

Table 1. Top Acinetobacter baumannii's journals in WOSCC (1990-2019) Based on Impact Factor

Citations	Self- Citation	Impact Factor	Quartile	Publisher	Country	No. of articles published	No of Highly cited papers	Journal	Rank
4587	47	9.05	Q1	Oxford University	UK	42	1	Clinical Infectious Diseases	1
4162	119	6.42	Q1	Elsevier		79	0	Clinical Microbiology and Infection	2
8068	272	5.11	Q1	Oxford University		160	6	Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy	3
7173	267	4.95	Q1	American Society for Microbiology	USA	111	0	Journal of Clinical Microbiology	4
16227	1106	4.71	Q1	American Society for Microbiology	USA	337	6	Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy	5

Table 2. Effective researchers of Acinetobacter baumannii in WOSCC (1990 - 2019)

Citation	Record	H-index	Self- Citation	Highly cited papers	Affiliation	Country	Author	Rank
4365	50	24	168	2	University Hospital Cologne	Germany	Seifert, Harald	1
3021	71	27	150	2	Case Western Reserve University	USA	Bonomo, Robert A	2
2791	15	12	23	1	University of Queensland	Australia	Paterson, David L	3
2694	20	14	42	0	Monash University	Australia	Peleg, Anton Y	4
2449	37	26	93	1	University of Fribourg	Switzerland	Nordmann, patrice	5

Top co-citation pairs in Acinetobacter baumannii
"Seifert, Harald * Higgins, Paul G" are the authors who have had the most co-citation pairs in A. baumannii and ranked first place. The researchers are from Germany and have had 54 co-citation pairs in the last three decades.

Top Acinetobacter baumannii Researchers Based on Degree, Betweenness and Closeness centrality
"Beceiro, Alejandro" with 52-degree centrality, "HSU Li Yang" with 368/1734 betweenness centrality, and "Seifert, Harald" with 0.280 closeness centrality are ranked first in centrality indicators.

Table 3. Top 10 co-citation pairs in Acinetobacter baumannii (1990-2019)

Countries of co-citation couples	No. of Co-Citations	co-citation pairs	Rank
Germany* Germany	54	Seifert, Harald * Higgins, Paul G.	1
Switzerland* Switzerland	52	Nordmann, patrice * Poirel, Laurent	2
Australia* Australia	29	Hall, Ruth M. * Kenyon, Johanna J	3
Taiwan* Taiwan	28	Chen Te-Li * Kuo-Shu CHEN	4
Australia* Australia	27	Li Jian * Nation, Roger L.	5
USA* USA	27	Popova, Anastasiya V. * Schneider, Mikhail M.	6
Russia* Russia	27	Knirel, Yuriy A. * Shashkov Alexander S.	7
Taiwan* Taiwan	26	Chen Te-Li * Lee Yi-tzu	8
Russia* Russia	26	Popova, Anastasiya V. * Knirel, Yuriy A.	9
Russia* USA	26	Knirel, Yuriy A. * Schneider, Mikhail M.	10

Acinetobacter baumannii research network based on centrality indicators

Figure 2. Acinetobacter Baumannii research network based on degree centrality

Figure 3. Acinetobacter Baumannii research network based on betweenness centrality

Figure 4. Acinetobacter Baumannii research network based on closeness centrality

Discussion

The trend of scientific publications of A. Baumannii researchers has been growing in the last three decades. The results of this part of the study are consistent with the results of research by Zeinoun (22), Liao (28), Sweileh (31). "Seifert, Harald" is the most influential researcher, and "Bonomo, Robert A" is the most proliferated one. These results are not consistent with the results of Figg (41) and Huamani (42) but are consistent with the research of Hassanzadeh et al. (30). "Seifert, Harald * Higgins, Paul G," is a co-citation pair who share common research interests.
"Beceiro, Alejandro" has more power in the knowledge flow of network and has a unique role in attracting new researchers to the scientific network (17). "HSU Li Yang," due to its central position in the network, has many relationships with other researchers and has an important strategic position in the overall structure of the collaboration network (17, 40). "Seifert, Harald," with the highest closeness centrality, is closer to other members of the network and has faster access to all researchers on the network than any other so that there can be more citations to his publications (17,39). From this perspective, the results of the present study are consistent with the research of Soheili et al. (37).

Conclusion

One of the most critical concepts and unique functions of social network analysis is the study of researchers' scientific collaboration network with centrality indicators that determine the importance and effectiveness of researchers and their performance in the cooperation network. Based on this, it is suggested that detailed and independent research of the Iranian A. baumannii researchers’ collaboration network be conducted.

Acknowledgements

In this regard, we appreciate the experts for their valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declared no conflict of interests.

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Medical Bacteriology
Received: 2020/03/14 | Accepted: 2020/05/28 | ePublished: 2020/06/18

References

1. Saleh, NM, Hesham MS, Amin MA, Samir Mohamed R. Acquisition of Colistin Resistance Links Cell Membrane Thickness Alteration with a Point Mutation in the lpxD Gene in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antibiotics, 2020; 9, 164. [DOI:10.3390/antibiotics9040164] [PMID] [PMCID]

2. Nurtop E, Baylndlr Bilman F, Menekse S, Kurt Azap O, Gonen M, Ergonul O, Can F. Promoters of Colistin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii Infections. Microbial Drug Resistance, 2019; 25(7): 997-1002. [DOI:10.1089/mdr.2018.0396] [PMID]

3. Lee C-R, Lee JH, Park M, Park KS, Bae IK, Kim YB, Cha C-J, Jeong BC and Lee SH Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: Pathogenesis, Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms, and Prospective Treatment Options. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol, 2017; 7:55. [DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00055]

4. Pormohammad A, Mehdinejadiani K, Gholizadeh P, et al. Global prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbial Pathogenesis, 2020; 139:103887. [DOI:10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103887] [PMID]

5. Wang X, Qin LJ. A review on Acinetobacter baumannii. J Acute Dis, 2019; 8: 16-20. [DOI:10.4103/2221-6189.250373]

6. Lin MF, Lan CY. Antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: from bench to bedside. World J. Clin. Cases, 2014; 2, 787-814. [DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.787] [PMID] [PMCID]

7. Wong D, Nielsen TB, Bonomo RA, Pantapalangkoor P, Luna BM, Spellberg BJ. Clinical and Pathophysiological Overview of Acinetobacter Infections: a Century of Challenges. Clinical microbiology reviews, 2016; 30 1, 409-447. [DOI:10.1128/CMR.00058-16] [PMID] [PMCID]

8. Levi I, Rubinstein E. Acinetobacter infections-overview of clinical features. In: Bergogne-Berezin E, Joly-Guillou M L, Towner K J, editors. Acinetobacter: microbiology, epidemiology, infections, management, 1996. New York, N.Y: CRC Press; 1996. pp. 101-115.

9. Karyne R, Curty Lechuga G, Almeida Souza AL, Rangel da Silva Carvalho JP, Simões Villas Bôas MH, De Simone SG. Pan-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, but Not Other Strains, Are Resistant to the Bee Venom Peptide Mellitin. Antibiotics, 2020; 9, 178. [DOI:10.3390/antibiotics9040178] [PMID] [PMCID]

10. Da Silva GJ, Domingues S. Interplay between Colistin Resistance, Virulence and Fitness in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antibiotics, 2017; 6, 28. [DOI:10.3390/antibiotics6040028] [PMID] [PMCID]

11. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics Are Urgently Needed; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.

12. Hoang Quoc C, Nguyen Thi Phuong, T, Nguyen Duc H, Tran Le T, Tran Thi Thu H, Nguyen Tuan S, Phan Trong L. Carbapenemase Genes and Multidrug Resistance of Acinetobacter Baumannii: A Cross Sectional Study of Patients with Pneumonia in Southern Vietnam. Antibiotics, 2019; 8, 148. [DOI:10.3390/antibiotics8030148] [PMID] [PMCID]

13. Aybar Türkoğlu M, Topeli Iskit A. Ventilator associated pneumonia caused by high risk microorganisms: a matched case-control study. Tuberk Toraks, 2008; 56(2): 139-49.

14. Maccain KW, Whitney PJ. Contrasting assessments of interdisciplinarity in emerging specialties. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1994; 15(3): 285-306. [DOI:10.1177/107554709401500303]

15. Chen C, Chen Y, Horowitz M, Hou H, Liu Z, Pellegrino D. Towards an Explanatory and Computational Theory of Scientific Discovery 1 Introduction. Journal of Informetrics Special Issue on Science of Science, 2009; 1-32.

16. Shiffrin RM, Borner K. Introduction. In: Mapping knowledge domains. PNAS, 2004, 101, Suppl, 1: 5183-5185. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0307852100] [PMID] [PMCID]

17. Tajedini O, Soheili F, Sadatmoosavi A. The Centrality Measures in Co-authorship Networks: Synergy or Antagonism in Researchers' Research Performance. Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management, 2019; 34 (3):1423-1452. (In Persian)

18. Soheili F, Osareh F. Concepts of Centrality and Density in Scientific and Social Networks. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 2013; 24(3): 92-108. (In Persian)

19. Leydesdorff L, Wagner CS, Bornmann L. Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity-A tribute to Eugene Garfield. Scientometrics, 2018; 114(2): 567-592. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-017-2528-2] [PMID] [PMCID]

20. Goltaji M, Behzadi Z. Citation Analysis and Histographic Outline of Scientific Output in Pathology by the Middle East countries Using Science Citation Index during 2000-2009. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 2014; 25(2): 68-84. (In Persian)

21. Zou Lu-Xi, Sun L. Visualization analysis of health informatics research from 2001 to 2018. Current Science, 2020; 118, 5: 714-721.

22. Zeinoun P, Akl EA, Maalouf FT and Meho LI. The Arab Region's Contribution to Global Mental Health Research (2009-2018): A Bibliometric Analysis. Front. Psychiatry, 2020; 11:182. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00182] [PMID] [PMCID]

23. Liu F, Wu TT, Lei G and et al. Worldwide tendency and perspectives in traumatic dental injuries: A bibliometric analysis over two decades (1999-2018). Dent Traumatol, 2020; 00: 1- 9. [DOI:10.1111/edt.12555] [PMID]

24. Kınıkoğlu O, Güven YÖ, Kılboz BB. Publication and Citation Analysis of Medical Doctors' Residency Master's Theses Involving Animal Experiments on Rats in Turkey. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 2020; 026119292090722. [DOI:10.1177/0261192920907226] [PMID]

25. He S, Zhao Y, Fan Y, Zhao X, Yu J, Xie J, Wang C, Su J. Research Trends and Hotspots Analysis Related to Monocarboxylate Transporter 1: A Study Based on Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2019; 16, 1091. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16071091] [PMID] [PMCID]

26. Seo B, Kim J, Kim S, Lee E. Bibliometric analysis of studies about acute myeloid leukemia conducted globally from 1999 to 2018. Blood Res, 2020; 55(1): 1-9. [DOI:10.5045/br.2020.55.1.1] [PMID] [PMCID]

27. Zhou H, Tan W, Qiu Z, Song Y, Gao S. A bibliometric analysis in gene research of myocardial infarction from 2001 to 2015. PeerJ, 2018; 6: e4354. [DOI:10.7717/peerj.4354] [PMID] [PMCID]

28. Liao H, Tang M, Luo LM, Li C, Chiclana F, Zeng X. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research. Sustainability, 2018; 10,166: 1-18. [DOI:10.3390/su10010166]

29. Xing D, Zhao Y, Dong S, Lin J. Global research trends in stem cells for osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized study. Int J Rheum Dis, 2018; 21: 1372-1384. [DOI:10.1111/1756-185X.13327] [PMID]

30. Hasanzadeh, P., Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., soheili, F. (2018). 'Co-authorship and the Re-lationship between So-cial Influ-ence and the Extent of Effec-tiveness and Productivi-ty of Re-searchers in Domain of Chronic Cardiovas-cular Fail-ure'. Journal of Scientometrics, 2018; 4(8): 143-160.(In Persian)

31. Sweileh WM, Shraim NY, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF, AbuTaha AS, Zyoud SH. Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on carbapenem resistance (1986-2015). Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 2016; 15(1). [DOI:10.1186/s12941-016-0169-6] [PMID] [PMCID]

32. Analytics, C. Web of Science platform: Web of Science: Summary of Coverage, 2020; Available online: https: //clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/coverage (accessed on 18 March 2020).

33. Birkle C, Pendlebury DA, Schnell J, Adams J. Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 2020; 1(1): 363-376. [DOI:10.1162/qss_a_00018]

34. Khaleghi N. A Glance at Evaluative Indexes in Science and Technology. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 2007; 18(3), 91-106. (In Persian)

35. Jin B, Liang L, Rousseau R, Egghe L. The R-and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese science bulletin. 2007; 52: 855-63. [DOI:10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9]

36. Danesh F, Ghavidel S. Coronavirus: Scientometrics of 50 Years of Global Scientific Productions. Iran J Med Microbiol, 2020; 14 (1):1-16. (In Persian) [DOI:10.30699/ijmm.14.1.1]

37. Soheili F, Sharif Moghaddam H, Mousavi Chelak A, Khasseh A A. An Evaluation of iMetric Studies through the Scholarly Influence Model. Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management, 2016; 32 (1) :25-50.(In Persian)

38. Soheili F, Osareh F. 'Concepts of Centrality and Density in Scientific and Social Networks'. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 2013; 24(3): 92-108. (In Persian)

39. Soheili F, Mansoori A. The Analysis of the Iranian Chemistry co-Authorship Network using Centrality Measure. Journal of Library and Information Science Studies, 2014; 21(Vol.6, No.13): 89-106. (In Persian)

40. Burt RS. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1992.

41. Figg WD, Dunn L, Liewehr DJ, Steinberg SM, Thurman PW, Barrett JC, Birkinshaw J. Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2006; 26: 759-767. [DOI:10.1592/phco.26.6.759] [PMID]

42. Huamani C, Rey de Castro J, Gonzalez-Alcaide G, Polesel DN, Tufik S, Andersen ML. Scientific research in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: bibliometric analysis in SCOPUS, 1991-2012. Sleep Breath, 2015; 19(1):109-14. [DOI:10.1007/s11325-014-0969-x] [PMID]