year 17, Issue 1 (January - February 2023)                   Iran J Med Microbiol 2023, 17(1): 90-102 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shayea R H, Ali M R. Whole-genome Study of Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Virulence and Resistance. Iran J Med Microbiol 2023; 17 (1) :90-102
URL: http://ijmm.ir/article-1-1828-en.html
1- Department of Biology, College of Science, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq , rasha.jk.bio@gmail.com
2- Department of Biology, College of Science, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq
Full-Text [PDF 746 kb]   (439 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1309 Views)
Full-Text:   (545 Views)
Introduction


The most common cause of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) nosocomial infections worldwide is the well-known Gram-negative bacterium Acinetobacter baumannii (1, 2). In hospital settings worldwide, the rise of MDR A. baumannii strains that are resistant to last-resort antibiotics like carbapenems and colistin is complicating therapy (3).
    Reduced membrane permeability, decreased efflux pump activity, and the production of a variety of ß-lactamase enzymes are all ways that A. baumannii might gain intrinsic resistance (4). However, this pathogen's resistance is commonly linked to mobile genetic elements (MGEs) that can be passed from one bacterial species to another, allowing for the quick spread and maintenance of resistance genes amongst other bacterial species (5). In addition to certain various naturally occurring intrinsic resistance genes, it can also acquire resistance through mutational alterations in chromosomal structure and horizontal gene transfer (6, 7). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has recently enabled resolution in highly related lineages without the requirement for species-dependent protocols, in addition to providing information on pathogen identification, virulence factors, drug susceptibility, comparative genomics, and the detection and investigation of outbreaks (8, 9). Additionally, Comparative genomic analysis of A. baumannii strains revealed that the genome of A. baumannii could acquire a large amount of foreign DNA, which could play a role in antimicrobial resistance and pathogenesis (10). In order to understand the resistance mechanism for A. baumannii species, this study set out to establish the genetic makeup of the species.


 

Materials and Methods

Identification of Bacterial Isolates

A total of 75 isolates have been taken from various hospitals in Baghdad (Central Children's Hospital, Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Burn Hospital, Children Protection Teaching Hospital (Medical City), Al-Imameen Al-Kadhimayn City Hospital) during the three months from March 2021 to June 2021. The isolates included: 75 specimens taken from wounds, urine, respiratory infections (sputum), burns, and CSF in patients setting in hospitals, particularly in intensive care units. All the isolates were characterized via VITEK 2 System, the biochemical reactions between the bacterial isolates that have been suspended in their solutions, and media in VITEK2 Identification Cards. The specimens were transported to the laboratory (via transport media) and cultured on A. baumannii-selective media (Chrom agar) and MacConkey agar, incubated at a temperature of 37oC for 24hrs under aerobic conditions. Then the colony's color, shape, edges, and texture were examined (11). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using a disk diffusion method, against sixteen different antibiotics, the results were interpreted using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) categories (12).  Bacterial DNA was extracted from the Nutrient agar after 24 hours of incubation at 37ºC according to the boiling method as Annotated in Abed & Ali (13). Genotyping detection was confirmed by amplifying the blaOXA-51 gene for A. baumannii confirmation, detection by PCR technique in comparison with positive controls strain (14). Tri-locus multiplex PCR as described by Turton et al. (15), was used to determine clonal relationships of these A. baumannii clinical isolates [Global Clones (GC) I, II, or III, also known as International Clones I, II, or III]. The isolate was fingerprinted by ERIC-PCR based on the methods of Coudron et al. (16).

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Collection of Sequence Data

Three A. baumannii (4,49 & 75) isolates were available for WGS.  DNA extraction was performed using the High-Pure template preparation kit (Roche Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The library preparation and paired-end sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer were performed for the three A. baumannii strains as previously described (4). Briefly, the Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was utilized to prepare the sequencing library, followed by paired-end sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
  The results were filtered, and the search items following the Library Layout (paired), Library Source (genomic), and Platform (Illumina) were eligible for inclusion.

Multilocus Sequence Typing. 

The sequences for the Institut Pasteur MLST genes, were extracted from the assembled contigs for all isolates, concatenated, and aligned with MUSCLE. A phylogeny was inferred with MEGA version 5.2.2, using the maximum-likelihood method, and exported to FigTree version 1.4.2 for visualization. In addition, sequence types were determined for all A. baumannii isolates using the database available on the Institut Pasteur MLST website (http://www.pasteur.fr/mlst).

Bioinformatics Data Analysis

Data analysis of sequences from three isolates of A. baumannii sequenced within this study and downloaded sequences was performed with the pipeline WGSBAC (v2.0.0) (4, 17). In short, raw sequencing data quality was controlled by WGSBAC with FastQC (v. 0.11.5), and coverage was determined (18). Shovel (v. 1.0.4), based on SPAdes (v3.14.0), was used for assembly (19). Assembly quality was checked with QUAST (v. 5.0.2) (20). Kraken 2 (v. 2.0.7 beta), in combination with the database MiniKraken (v2), was used to classify reads and assemblies and to check for contamination (21). The assembled genome sequence was annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP) which uses AMR Finder Plus, ResFinder, and CARD For antimicrobial resistance profiling and determination of AMR genes (22-24). The VFDB database was used to detect the virulence traits (25). tRNAscan-SE for tRNA genes (26) , and RNAmmer for rRNA genes (27). The regions with abnormal G+C contents in the genomic sequence were obtained by using the GC-Profile program (28). Prophage regions and CRISPR-Cas proteins were detected using the web tools, PHASTER (29) and CRISPRCasFinder (30), respectively.  PlasmidFinder and Platon were used to investigate the potential presence of plasmids and plasmid replicons (31, 32).

Data Access

This sequences data of this study has been submitted to the NCBI BioProject (http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject) under BioProject accessions:
PRJNA850024, PRJNA802181, and PRJNA850033, Respectively.

 
 

Results

During the study period, A total of 75 isolates of A. baumannii recovered from clinical samples. Isolates were confirmed as A. baumannii by the presence of intrinsic, bla OXA-51-like gene (Figure1). Most of the A. baumannii isolates were obtained from the ICU (40%). Bacterial isolates were predominantly recovered from lower respiratory tract specimens (n = 20/75; 26%), blood samples (n = 18/75; 24%), burn swaps (n = 13/75; 17%), wound exudates (n = 10/75; 13%), urine samples (n = 7/75; 9%), CSF samples (n = 4/75; 5%), and fluid specimens (n = 3/75; 4%).

 Figure 1. The blaOXA-51 gene product size (band 353 bp) was detected by using agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose, 7v/cm2) with Ethidium bromide staining. Utilizing the template DNA that was prepared with the use of the boiling method. The molecular size of the DNA ladder was 100 bp, located in the middle (M). DNA isolated from A. baumannii samples have shown positive PCR, with a positive control on the right and negative control on the left.
Figure 1. The blaOXA-51 gene product size (band 353 bp) was detected by using agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose, 7v/cm2) with Ethidium bromide staining. Utilizing the template DNA that was prepared with the use of the boiling method. The molecular size of the DNA ladder was 100 bp, located in the middle (M). DNA isolated from A. baumannii samples have shown positive PCR, with a positive control on the right and negative control on the left. 

 

Based on the results of the categories of resistance, Genotyping detection by using ERIC-PCR typing and Epidemiological typing represented by Global lineage, we selected 3 isolates, based on the variety of outcomes within each chosen category, the isolates were chosen (Table 1).

 
Table 1. Criteria used to select isolates for WGS

Character A.baumannii (4) A.baumanni (49) A.baumannii (75)
Source Blood Urine Blood
Gender Female Male Female
Resistance categories 6/16 (MDR) 16/16(PDR) 15/16 (XDR)
Global lineage G2 G3 G1
ERIC-PCR (Band no. and size) Group E
1 band (550bp)
Untypable St (out of group)
1 band (580bp)

In this study, we tried to capture as much diversity of A. baumannii clones as feasible while keeping the number of isolates as low as possible for clarity of presentation. Selected Three isolates, AB75 assigned: ST195 which represented known international clones of high risk and AB49 assigned: ST1104 represented unique ST ,while AB4 isolate represented singletons that could not be attributed to any ICs, possessed a novel sequence type that was not clustered with existing international clones by either cgMLST or MLST loci (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Based on cgMLST characteristics, the minimal spanning tree for the isolates examined (4,49 and 75). The numbers reflect amount of distinct alleles found in the pairs of related isolates. Close isolates are shown in the same color; other isolates are not. 
Figure 2. Based on cgMLST characteristics, the minimal spanning tree for the isolates examined (4,49 and 75). The numbers reflect amount of distinct alleles found in the pairs of related isolates. Close isolates are shown in the same color; other isolates are not.

Figure 2. Based on cgMLST characteristics, the minimal spanning tree for the isolates examined (4,49 and 75). The numbers reflect amount of distinct alleles found in the pairs of related isolates. Close isolates are shown in the same color; other isolates are not.

 

Whole Genome Sequencing of the Three A. baumannii Strains

 After de novo assembly and manual gap-closing by PCR and re-sequencing using the Sanger sequencing method, the complete genomes of A. baumannii 4 (ST/944), A. baumannii 49 (ST/1104), and A. baumannii 75 (ST/195) strains yield 3,926741 bp, 9,241711 bp, and 3,995107 bp with a G+C content of 38.74%, 50.61%, and 38.96%, respectively. The number of contigs of A.baumannii 4(ST/944) , 49(ST/1104), and 75(ST/195) was 34, 165, and 89. The mean N50 of the three assembled genomes was 283689, 231932, and 121908, respectively (Table 2 and Figure 2). The characteristics of the three genomes are listed in Table 2. Using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP) and the genome of Acinetobacter baumannii strain GU71 (470.4681) as a reference sequence, we predicted 3,761, 9,251, and 3909 protein-coding sequences from A. baumanni 4(ST/944), A. baumannii 49(ST/1104), and A. baumannii 75(ST/195) genomes, respectively. The complete ribosomal cluster was 64 tRNAs were identified in the genomes of each A. baumannii 4 (ST/944) and 75(ST/195), while 144 tRNAs were identified for A. baumannii 49(ST/1104). Additionally, rRNAs were 3 for each of A. baumannii 4(ST/944) & 75(ST/195), while 5 rRNAs were for A. baumannii 49(ST/1104).


Table 2. Genome features of A. baumannii  4,49 & 75 strains

Characteristic A. baumannii 4 A. baumannii 49 A. baumannii 75
Genome ID 470.14854 470.14818 470.14828
Genome Length 3926741 bp 9241711 bp 3995107 bp
G+C content (%) 38.74 50.614902 38.96
Number of contigs 34 165 89
Contig L50 3 10 11
Contig N50 283689 231932 121908
Coarse Consistency 99.4 97.7 99.5
Fine Consistency 98.7 59.6 99
Genome Quality Good Poor Good
CDS 3761 9251 3909
tRNA 64 144 64
rRNA 3 5 3
Transporter 41 299 44
Drug Target 10 174 11

CRISPR‑Cas System

A subtype I-F CRISPR-Cas was identifed on the chromosome of A. baumannii 4(ST/944) only, with a 2 bp CRISPR array containing 114 spacers. The spacers are flanked by 116 bp of CRISPR repeats. It indicated that strains with close phylogenetic relationships have similar genes and share gene synteny on their CRISPR-Cas system.

Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

  The in-silico detection of acquired AMR genes in A. baumannii 4 (ST/944),49 (ST/1104) and 75(ST/195) isolates based on WGS data using the ResFinder database succeeded in identifying 51 acquired AMR genes (Supplementary Table 3). Among the 23 drug-resistance-related genes, 12 of them are shared by all 3 strains and 11 are common between A. baumannii 4(ST/944),49 (ST/1104) and 75(ST/195). The common drug-resistance genes shared by all 3 strains include bla OXA-72 (resistance to carbapenems), ade genes, RND  (adeFJKadeLN adeR), and SMR   (abeS) encoding for efflux pumps. ANT(3'')-IIc and A.baumannii AbaF (aminoglycoside resistance), A.baumannii parC, and  A.baumannii AbaQ responsible for resistance to fluoroquinolones were also identified in all 3  A. baumannii strains.
A. baumannii 49(ST/1104) and A. baumannii 75(ST/195) shared all drug-resistant genes except blaOXA66, ade(AG), and ADC-73 (Rrisitance to cephalosporin), which are unique to A.baumannii 75(ST/195), while blaOXA90 and ADC-52 genes, which are unique to A.baumannii 49(ST/1104). A. baumannii 4 (ST/944) harbors 15 drug-resistance genes, 12 of which are shared with the other two stains and three of which are unique to A. baumannii4, including bla OXA99, adeG, and ADC-154.

Prediction of virulence genes

The VFDB database (25) was used to characterize the virulence traits present in A.baumannii 4(ST/944) ,49 (ST/1104), and 75(ST/195). A total of 54 virulence-related genes were determined in the genomes of A.baumannii 4(ST/944), 49(ST/1104), and 75(ST/195) (Supplementary Table 4). Most of these genes are involved in efflux pumps, capsular polysaccharide lipopolysaccharide, biofilm formation, quorum sensing, outer membrane protein ompA, a two-component regulatory system, iron uptake, phospholipase C and D, serum resistance, and some putative virulence factors. These genes were shared by three strains of A. baumannii 4(ST/944), 49(ST/1104), and 75(ST/195) (See Table 4). Most of the genes involved in pathogenesis are the same as those in other A. baumannii isolates. Except for the (pilE) genes, which encode for Type IV pili, are unique to the A. baumannii 4 (ST/944) strain. Additionally, the pathogenesis genes (fliM and rcsAB) are unique to strain A. baumannii 49(ST/1104) but not found in other strains.

 

Table 3.List of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes identified in A. baumannii (4,49 and 75 ) isolates based on WGS data using ResFinder databases

AMR gene Mechanism Frequency  in three isolates Predicted phenotype
A.baumannii AbaF Antibiotic efflux 3 fosfomycin
A.baumannii AbaQ antibiotic efflux 3 fluoroquinolone antibiotic
A.baumannii gyrA antibiotic target alteration 2
A.baumannii parC antibiotic target alteration 3
abeS Antibiotic efflux 3 Macrolide antibiotic aminocoumarin antibiotic
ADC-152 antibiotic inactivation 1 Cephalosporins
ADC-154 antibiotic inactivation 1
ADC-73 antibiotic inactivation 1
adeA Antibiotic efflux 1 Glycylcycline antibiotic
tetracycline antibiotic
adeF Antibiotic efflux 3 Fluoroquinolone antibiotic tetracycline antibiotics
adeG Antibiotic efflux 2
adeH Antibiotic efflux 2
adeI Antibiotic efflux 2
adeJ Antibiotic efflux 3 macrolide antibiotic fluoroquinolone antibiotic lincosamide antibiotic carbapenem
cephalosporin
tetracycline antibiotic rifamycin antibiotic diaminopyrimidine antibiotic phenicol antibiotic
penem
adeK Antibiotic efflux 3
adeL Antibiotic efflux 3 Fluoroquinolone  antibiotic
tetracycline antibiotics
adeN Antibiotic efflux 3 macrolide antibiotic fluoroquinolone antibiotic lincosamide antibiotic carbapenem
cephalosporin
tetracycline antibiotic rifamycin antibiotic diaminopyrimidine antibiotic phenicol antibiotic
penem
adeR Antibiotic efflux 3 Glycylcycline antibiotic
tetracycline antibiotic
ANT(3'')-IIc Antibiotic inactivation 3 Aminoglycosides
OXA-66 antibiotic inactivation 1 Carbapenem
Cephalosporin
penam
OXA-72 antibiotic inactivation 3
OXA-90 antibiotic inactivation 1
OXA-99 antibiotic inactivation 1


Table 4. The virulence genes in A. baumannii4,49 and 75 strains

VF Class Virulence factors Genes A. baumannii4 No. of genes A.baumannii 49 No. of genes A. baumannii 75 No. of genes
Adherence Outer membrane protein ompA + (1) + (1) + (1)
Type IV pili pilE + (1) - -
Biofilm formation AdeFGH Efflux pump/transport autoinducer AdeFGH  
+ (3)
 
+ (3)
 
+ (3)
Biofilm-associated protein bap + (1) + (1) + (1)
Csu pili csuA/B, csuA, csuB, csuC, csuD, csuE + (6) + (6) + (6)
PNAG (Polysaccharide poly-N-acetylglucosamine) pgaA. pgaB, pgaC, pgaD + (4) + (4) + (4)
Motility flagellar motor switch protein FliM fliM - + (1) -
Enzyme Phospholipase C Plc, plc, + (1) + (2) + (1)
Phospholipase D plcD + (1) + (1) + (1)
Immune evasion Capsule mynA/sacA, rmlC, wbjD/wecB,gnd, probable wbaZ, wzb - + (8) -
LPS lpsB, lpxA, lpxB, lpxC, lpxD, lpxL, lpxM, acpXL + (7) + (8) + (7)
Iron uptake Acinetobactin barA, barB, basA, basB, basC, basD, basF,basG, basH, basI, basJ, bauA, bauB, bauC, bauD, bauE, bauF, entE + (18) + (18) + (18)
Heme utilization hemO + (1) +(1) + (1)
Regulation Quorum sensing abaI, abaR + (2) + (2) + (2)
Two-component system bfmR, bfmS + (2) + (2) + (2)
transcriptional regulator rcsA,B - + (2) -
Serum resistance pbpG pbpG + (1) + (1) + (1)
tress adaptation Catalase (Neisseria) KatA, katG + (1) + (2) + (1)

In Silico Detection of Plasmids

 We also used PlasmidFinder and plasmidSPAdes software to search for plasmids or plasmid-related sequences in genomes of A.baumannii 4(ST/944),49(ST/1104) and 75(ST/195). One conjugative plasmid (pWP8-W18-ESBL-11)  was found in A.baumannii 4(ST/944), and three plasmids (pVB473_1, pAbCTX11 and ABAY15001_6E) were found in A. baumannii 49(ST/1104). While two plasmids( pVB473_1 and pABAY15001_6E) were identified in A. baumannii 75(ST/195).

Prophage Regions

 Prophage sequences were identified using the PHASTER server (29). In A. baumannii 4(ST/944), three prophage regions have been identified, two of which are intact and one region is incomplete. Both A.baumannii 49(ST/1104) and A.baumannii 75(ST/195) strains have 9 prophage regions, two regions are intact and seven are incomplete for each strain (Table 5).
The intact prophage regions of all strains may have (tail, integrase, portal, capsid, lysis, terminase, head, recombinase & plate or tail, head & terminase or tail, capsid, terminase). While incomplete prophage regions, there may be (plate& transposase or tail & integrase or head& capsid or only N.A. or integrase or tail& recombinase).


Table 5. prophage identification in A. baumannii 4,49 and 75 strains

Character A.baumanni 4 A.baumannii 49 A.baumannii 75
Region Most common phage Region Most common phage Region Most common phage
Intact 5 PHAGE_Acinet_Bphi_B1251_NC_019541, ...... 1 PHAGE_Edward_GF_2_NC_026611(18) 2 PHAGE_Acinet_vB_AbaS_TRS1_NC_031098(8)
10 PHAGE_Salmon_SSU5-NC- 018843(23) 2 PHAGE_Erwini_EtG_NC_047833(8) 14 PHAGE_Mannhe_vB_MhM_3927AP2_NC_028766(12)
incomplete 10 PHAGE-Pseudo-nickie-NC- 042091(16) 1 PHAGE_Pectob_ZF40_NC_019522(13) 12 PHAGE_Acinet_YMC11/11/R3177_NC_041866(3)
    9 PHAGE_Escher_500465_1_NC_049342(8) 26 PHAGE_Acinet_vB_AbaS_TRS1_NC_031098(8)
    20 PHAGE_Paenib_Tripp_NC_028930(2) 34 PHAGE_Acinet_Bphi_B1251_NC_019541(9)
    33 PHAGE_Acinet_Bphi_B1251_NC_019541(9) 39 PHAGE_Acinet_Bphi_B1251_NC_019541(18)
    47 PHAGE_Acinet_Bphi_B1251_NC_019541(5) 42 PHAGE_Acinet_YMC11/11/R3177_NC_041866(18)
    49 PHAGE_Acinet_Bphi_B1251_NC_019541(12) 46 PHAGE_Psychr_pOW20_A_NC_020841(6)
    67 PHAGE_Phage_Gifsy_1_NC_010392(4) 58 PHAGE_Acinet_Bphi_B1251_NC_019541(8)

 
 

Discussion

The genus Acinetobacter represents an important group of pathogens, mainly due to its extreme genome plasticity and the ability to acquire foreign DNA (33). To analyze the multidrug resistance phenotype of A. baumannii strains 4(ST/944), 49(ST/1104), and 75(ST/195) on a molecular basis, their whole genomes were sequenced to identify antibiotic resistance and virulence genes to determine their relationship to other sequenced clinical and multiresistant A. baumannii isolates, also considering epidemiological aspects.
 MLST analysis confirmed the considerable genetic diversity of A. baumannii in the investigated strains from Baghdad hospitlization. MLST analyses based on the Pasteur scheme identified 195 sequence types (ST) for A.baumannii 75 strain was the most prevalent sequence type circulating in the Baghdad hospitals. ST/195 belongs to the international clones  and is the most dominant type globally (34). In previous studies, most of the CRAb isolates were found belong to the ST2 lineage in strains isolated from Thailand , Myanmar and among strains isolated from other countries (35, 36). A. baumanniia 49 strain that assigned: ST1104 represented unique ST ,could not be assigned to a distinct sequence type due to new alleles. While A. baumannii 4 strain  that contain 944 sequence types (ST) were unique singletons, possessed a novel sequence type that was not clustered with existing international clones by either cgMLST or MLST loci . These findings are, moreover, in agreement with those of Gaiarsa et al., who demonstrated that the Pasteur scheme is more appropriate for epidemiological studies of A. baumannii and proposed it to be the scheme of choice in parallel with cgMLST (37).
As a rule of thumb, 5–10X coverage is suggested to support sequence assembly and genome reconstruction (38). In our study, only one isolate of A. baumannii (39) had a sequencing depth below 5X (poor quality). One reasing for low sequencing depth is can be influenced by errors at many stages during DNA processing and library preparation, such as amplification errors, DNA quality, and target region complexity (40, 41).  Another reason for low sequencing depth could be that the Illumina sequencing platform favors GC-balanced regions that have fewer reads in GC-poor regions, resulting in unequal sequencing depth across the genome (42). In our study, GC content in A. baumannii 4(ST/944) (38.7 %), A. baumannii 75(ST/195) (38.9 %) with good quality, and A. baumannii 49(ST/1104) (50.6 %) with low quality does not agree with the statement above. But agree with Kauser (43), were found that the average GC percent in E. coli (50 %), K. pneumoniae (56%) with low quality, and A. baumannii (39%) with high quality. Regarding contiguity, 4(ST/944), 49(ST/1104), and 75(ST/195) isolates of A. baumannii had 34, 165, and 84 contigs, respectively, with a high degree of completeness (100%) from the BUSCO score, indicating successful genome assembly and accurate analysis.
The assembly of the A.baumannii 4(ST/944),49(ST/1104) and 75(ST/195) strains yielded 3926741 bp, 9241711 bp and 395107 bp with an N50 contig size of 283689, 231932 and 121908 bp and a G+C content of 38.74%, 50.614902% and 38.96%, respectively (Table 2). To check for possible contamination and accurate species identification, the software Kraken2 was used, which classifies each read (or contig) (19, 44). The number of predicted proteins, as well as the average length of the genes, is comparable with other previously sequenced genomes (Acinetobacter baumannii strain GU71 470.4681 as a reference sequence). At the species level, the first match for all A. baumannii strains belongs to the A. baumannii species. Furthermore, the phylogenetic position of each strain among available Acinetobacter genomes was studied based on a previously described pipeline (45).
RISPR-Cas was identified on the chromosome of A. baumannii 4(ST/944) only.  Since the spacers in the CRISPR array do not change over time, the high number of spacers identified in the CRISPR loci of this pathogen suggests that it might have encountered a high number of phage attacks. The presence of the CRISPR-Cas system could explain the low number of plasmids found within this genome (46).
   Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that the 3 A.baumannii strains are resistant to almost all commonly used antibiotics. The genetic variations responsible for resistance to most the antibiotics have been identified in all A. baumannii strains (Table 3). It is well known that the acquisition of genetic determinants in A. baumannii is crucial to the evolution of this pathogen. A combination of different mechanisms such as transformation, conjugation, and transduction and a variety of elements play a role in this process. Key elements directly involved in the acquisition of genetic material are ISs and transposons, genomic islands, integrons, and plasmids (44, 47). Genes involved in resistance to, fluoroquinolone, macrolide, aminoglycoside, and β-lactam were found in the A. baumannii 4(ST/944), 49(ST/1104), and 75(ST/195) genomes.
Resistance to β-Lactams: In total, nine AMR genes mediating resistance to ß-lactams, including cephalosporins and carbapenems, were identified. The Ambler class D β-lactamases were present in almost all strains. The variants of the intrinsic blaOXA-72 carbapenemase gene were the most frequent and was found in three A. baumannii strains; blaOXA-99 was found in A. baumannii 4(ST/944) isolate, followed by blaOXA-90 was found in A. baumannii 49(ST/1104) isolate and blaOXA-66 was present in A. baumannii 75(ST/195) isolate. Three Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporins blaADC variants of the Ambler class C β-lactamases were identified. The blaADC-154 was detected in A. baumannii 4(ST/944) isolate, followed by blaADC-152 in A. baumannii 49(ST/1104) isolate and blaADC-73 in A. baumannii 75(ST/195) isolate (Table 3).
Two ambler classes of β-lactamases (i.e., classes C and D) were identified in the current study. Various resistance genes conferring resistance to carbapenems and cephalosporins were found in A. baumannii isolated from hospitals in Baghdad. The blaOXA-72 variants were among the most frequent AMR genes identified. Which are currently spreading on plasmids and associated with resistance to all β-lactam compounds, including carbapenems (48, 49). The ADC beta-lactamases are cephalosporinases with extended-spectrum resistance to cephalosporins. All strains harbored blaADC gene, which are considered significant determinant responsible for cephalosporins resistance in A. baumannii (39).
Resistance to Aminoglycosides: In the three analyzed strains, 3 AMR genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides were identified. Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs), including nucleotidyltransferases (ANTs), were identified in all strains of A. baumannii. Aminoglycosides are broad-spectrum antibiotics used against a wide range of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria in clinical settings. However, their efficacy has been reduced by resistance development (50). This finding highlights the diversity of aminoglycoside-resistant A. baumannii strains mediated by ANT (3'')-IIc in Baghdad hospitals.
The fluoroquinolone resistance in A. baumannii 4(ST/944), 49 (ST/1104) and 75(ST/195) correlated with the results of Ostrer et al., which stated that it could be predicted based solely on target gene quinolone-resistance mutations for A. baumannii and that the primary mutation is followed by either of two mutations in the alternate target in this species, ParC88 ← GyrA81 → ParC84 (51).
Antibiotic Efflux Pumps: Four categories of efflux pumps were found in A. baumannii isolates, including the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) superfamily, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family and the small multidrug resistance (SMR) family transporters. Among these different pumps, the RND (adeFJKadeLN adeR), and SMR   (abeS) were most frequent and found in almost all isolates. RND efflux pump-coding genes (adeG ) were found in A. baumannii 4(ST/944) and 75(ST/195)  strains, (adeIH) were found in A.baumannii 49(ST/1104) and 75(ST/195) strains, while (adeA) were found only in A. baumannii 75(ST/195) strain (Table 3). Resistance mediated by antibiotic efflux pump-encoding genes is well documented in A. baumannii (52). Efflux pumps play significant roles in developing AMR in A. baumannii (53). The circulation of numerous efflux pumps with high frequency suggests a significant rise in A. baumannii antibiotic resistance in Iraq. Acinetobacter baumannii AbaF was found in all strains of Abaumannii isolated from Baghdad hospitals. AbaF is a major facilitator superfamily (MFS) antibiotic efflux pump interfering with protein synthesis. Its expression in A.baumannii increases resistance to fosfomycin. The high frequency of resistance to fosfomycin was seen in the tested strains and in a previous study on A. baumannii (4). It has been reported that the abaF gene is involved in fosfomycin resistance in A. baumannii and plays a role in biofilm formation and virulence mechanisms (54).
A total of 18 virulence factors with 54 virulence-related genes were determined in the genomes of A.baumannii 4(ST/944), 49(ST/1104) and75 (ST/195) (Table 4). Analysis of the genes showed that most of these genes and their role in virulence were shared by all strains of A.baumannii genomes. It appeared that A. baumannii strains possess different virulence genes featuring predicted functions in adherence, biofilm formation, immune evasion, iron uptake, serum resistance, and motility, among others (Table 4), which facilitate their survival under unfavorable conditions (55). Also, outer membrane protein ompA was found in all strains of A. baumannii, which induces cytotoxicity and constitutes a virulence factor with multiple important effects on the pathogenesis of A. baumannii (56). Another important virulence factors identified in A. baumannii are LPS. It has been play a role in pathogenesis, allowing the bacteria to resist the bactericidal activity of complement and providing protection from diverse environmental conditions such as desiccation and antibiotic exposure (57).
Acinetobacter baumannii 4(ST/944), 49(ST/1104) and 75(ST/195) isolates contain one, three, and two conjugative plasmids respectively. Plasmids in our isolates were linked to pathogen virulence and the formation of drug-resistant persister cells and biofilms (58).
In addition, using the PHAST tool to predict phage sequences, It has been documented that the presence and/or the number of prophages are not homogeneous in bacterial genomes, possibly due to their intrinsic genetic variability (59, 60). This was observed in our work where we found different amounts of prophages in the genomes analyzed (Table 5). Moreover, it is likely that the presence of a CRISPR-cas system in A. baumannii 4(ST/944) had contributed to the absence of more prophages.


 

Conclusion

We present WGS analysis of three A. baumannii strains belonging to three different STs. The presence of strains harboring acquired AMR genes makes them more dangerous. Acquired resistance genes and chromosomal gene mutation are successful routes for disseminating AMR determinants among A. baumannii. Identification of chromosomal and plasmid-encoded AMR in the genome of A. baumannii may help understand the mechanism behind the genetic mobilization and spread of AMR genes. WGS technologies and bioinformatics analysis tools for nosocomial outbreak analyses allow the resolution of highly related lineages without the need for species-dependent protocols. Moreover, it gives information on pathogen identification, virulence factors, drug susceptibility, comparative genomics, and detection and investigation of outbreaks in recent years.

 

Acknowledgment

The authors appreciate the support of Mustansiriyah University, College of Science, Biology Department, Baghdad, Iraq. For their contribution to this research work.
 

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in the publication.


 

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Molecular Microbiology
Received: 2022/07/21 | Accepted: 2022/09/9 | ePublished: 2023/01/20

References
1. Santajit S, Indrawattana N. Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2475067. [DOI:10.1155/2016/2475067] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Kurihara MNL, Sales ROd, Silva KEd, Maciel WG, Simionatto S. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii outbreaks: a global problem in healthcare settings. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020;53. [DOI:10.1590/0037-8682-0248-2020] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Ayobami O, Willrich N, Harder T, Okeke IN, Eckmanns T, Markwart R. The incidence and prevalence of hospital-acquired (carbapenem-resistant) Acinetobacter baumannii in Europe, Eastern Mediterranean and Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8(1):1747-59. [DOI:10.1080/22221751.2019.1698273] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Wareth G, Linde J, Hammer P, Nguyen NH, Nguyen TNM, Splettstoesser WD, et al. Phenotypic and WGS-derived antimicrobial resistance profiles of clinical and non-clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Germany and Vietnam. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56(4):106127. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106127] [PMID]
5. Brovedan MA, Cameranesi MM, Limansky AS, Morán-Barrio J, Marchiaro P, Repizo GD. What do we know about plasmids carried by members of the Acinetobacter genus? World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;36(8):109. [DOI:10.1007/s11274-020-02890-7] [PMID]
6. Pagano M, Martins AF, Barth AL. Mobile genetic elements related to carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47:785-92. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjm.2016.06.005] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Brandt C, Braun SD, Stein C, Slickers P, Ehricht R, Pletz MW, et al. In silico serine β-lactamases analysis reveals a huge potential resistome in environmental and pathogenic species. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):43232. [DOI:10.1038/srep43232] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Quainoo S, Coolen Jordy PM, van Hijum Sacha AFT, Huynen Martijn A, Melchers Willem JG, van Schaik W, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Bacterial Pathogens: the Future of Nosocomial Outbreak Analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30(4):1015-63. [DOI:10.1128/CMR.00016-17] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Durand G, Javerliat F, Bes M, Veyrieras J-B, Guigon G, Mugnier N, et al. Routine Whole-Genome Sequencing for Outbreak Investigations of Staphylococcus aureus in a National Reference Center. Front Microbiol. 2018;9. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00511] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Lin MF, Lan CY. Antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: From bench to bedside. World J Clin Cases. 2014;2(12):787-814. [DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.787] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Atlas RM, Brown AE, Parks LC. Laboratory Manual of Experimental Microbiology: Mosby, st. Louis U.S.A; 1997.
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, CLSI supplement M100 CLSI. 30th ed: Wayne, PA; 2020.
13. Abed E, Ali M. Molecular Analysis of Efflux Pumps and Quorum Sensing Genes In Mdr Acinetobacter Baumannii. Biochem Cell Arch. 2020;20(1):0-000.
14. Ridha D, Ali M, Jassim K. Occurrence of Metallo-β-Lactamase Genes among Acinetobacter Baumannii Isolated from Different Clinical Samples. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2019;13(2):1111-9. [DOI:10.22207/JPAM.13.2.50]
15. Turton JF, Gabriel SN, Valderrey C, Kaufrnann ME, Pitt TL. Use of sequence-based typing and multiplex PCR to identify clonal lineages of outbreak strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(8):807-15. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01759.x] [PMID]
16. Coudron Philip E, Moland Ellen S, Thomson Kenneth S. Occurrence and Detection of AmpC Beta-Lactamases among Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis Isolates at a Veterans Medical Center. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(5):1791-6. [DOI:10.1128/JCM.38.5.1791-1796.2000] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. García-Soto S, Abdel-Glil MY, Tomaso H, Linde J, Methner U. Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Subspecies enterica Serovar Infantis of Multilocus Sequence Type 2283 in German Broiler Farms. Front Microbiol. 2020;11. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01741] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Andrews S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. v. 0.11.5. 2020.
19. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19(5):455-77. [DOI:10.1089/cmb.2012.0021] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, G T. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072-5. [DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):257. [DOI:10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Haft Daniel H, Prasad Arjun B, Slotta Douglas J, Tolstoy I, et al. Validating the AMRFinder Tool and Resistance Gene Database by Using Antimicrobial Resistance Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in a Collection of Isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(11):e00483-19. [DOI:10.1128/AAC.00483-19] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(11):2640-4. [DOI:10.1093/jac/dks261] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, et al. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D566-D73. [DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw1004] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Liu B, Zheng D, Jin Q, Chen L, Yang J. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D687-D92. [DOI:10.1093/nar/gky1080] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: A Program for Improved Detection of Transfer RNA Genes in Genomic Sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(5):955-64. [DOI:10.1093/nar/25.5.955] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(9):3100-8. [DOI:10.1093/nar/gkm160] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Gao F, Zhang C-T. GC-Profile: a web-based tool for visualizing and analyzing the variation of GC content in genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(suppl_2):W686-W91. [DOI:10.1093/nar/gkl040] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W16-W21. [DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw387] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C, Touchon M, Michalik J, Néron B, et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W246-W51. [DOI:10.1093/nar/gky425] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, et al. In Silico Detection and Typing of Plasmids using PlasmidFinder and Plasmid Multilocus Sequence Typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(7):3895-903. [DOI:10.1128/AAC.02412-14] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Schwengers O, Barth P, Falgenhauer L, Hain T, Chakraborty T, Goesmann A. Platon: identification and characterization of bacterial plasmid contigs in short-read draft assemblies exploiting protein sequence-based replicon distribution scores. Microb Genom. 2020;6(10). [DOI:10.1099/mgen.0.000398] [PMID] [PMCID]
33. Schramm STJ, Place K, Montaña S, Almuzara M, Fung S, Fernandez JS, et al. Genetic and Phenotypic Features of a Novel Acinetobacter Species, Strain A47, Isolated From the Clinical Setting. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1375. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01375] [PMID] [PMCID]
34. Hamidian M, Nigro SJ. Emergence, molecular mechanisms and global spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Genom. 2019;5(10). [DOI:10.1099/mgen.0.000306]
35. Thirapanmethee K, Srisiri-a-nun T, Houngsaitong J, Montakantikul P, Khuntayaporn P, Chomnawang MT. Prevalence of OXA-Type β-Lactamase Genes among Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates in Thailand. Antibiotics [Internet]. 2020; 9(12). [DOI:10.3390/antibiotics9120864] [PMID] [PMCID]
36. Tada T, Uchida H, Hishinuma T, Watanabe S, Tohya M, Kuwahara-Arai K, et al. Molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from hospitals in Myanmar. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:122-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.jgar.2020.02.011] [PMID]
37. Gaiarsa S, Batisti Biffignandi G, Esposito EP, Castelli M, Jolley KA, Brisse S, et al. Comparative Analysis of the Two Acinetobacter baumannii Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) Schemes. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:930. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00930] [PMID] [PMCID]
38. Kunin V, Copeland A, Lapidus A, Mavromatis K, Hugenholtz P. A Bioinformatician's Guide to Metagenomics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72(4):557-78. [DOI:10.1128/MMBR.00009-08] [PMID] [PMCID]
39. Lee SY, Oh MH, Yun SH, Choi CW, Park EC, Song HS, et al. Genomic characterization of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strain, KAB03 belonging to ST451 from Korea. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;65:150-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.meegid.2018.07.030] [PMID]
40. Jennings LJ, Arcila ME, Corless C, Kamel-Reid S, Lubin IM, Pfeifer J, et al. Guidelines for Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Panels: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn. 2017;19(3):341-65. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.01.011] [PMID] [PMCID]
41. Ma X, Shao Y, Tian L, Flasch DA, Mulder HL, Edmonson MN, et al. Analysis of error profiles in deep next-generation sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):50. [DOI:10.1186/s13059-019-1659-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
42. Sims D, Sudbery I, Ilott NE, Heger A, Ponting CP. Sequencing depth and coverage: key considerations in genomic analyses. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(2):121-32. [DOI:10.1038/nrg3642] [PMID]
43. Kauser A. Resistome Identification from Whole Genome Sequencing Data of Norwegian Isolates. Norway2020.
44. Roca I, Espinal P, Vila-Farrés X, Vila J. The Acinetobacter baumannii oxymoron: commensal hospital dweller turned pan-drug-resistant menace. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:148. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00148] [PMID] [PMCID]
45. Agaras BC, Iriarte A, Valverde CF. Genomic insights into the broad antifungal activity, plant-probiotic properties, and their regulation, in Pseudomonas donghuensis strain SVBP6. PloS one. 2018;13(3):e0194088. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0194088] [PMID] [PMCID]
46. Ten KE, Md Zoqratt MZH, Ayub Q, Tan HS. Characterization of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strain ATCC BAA1605 using whole-genome sequencing. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):83. [DOI:10.1186/s13104-021-05493-z] [PMID] [PMCID]
47. Wright MS, Iovleva A, Jacobs MR, Bonomo RA, Adams MD. Genome dynamics of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during infection and treatment. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):26. [DOI:10.1186/s13073-016-0279-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
48. Rao M, Rashid FA, Shukor S, Hashim R, Ahmad N. Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes associated with carbapenem resistance from the whole-genome sequence of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Malaysia. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020;2020. [DOI:10.1155/2020/5021064] [PMID] [PMCID]
49. Khurshid M, Rasool MH, Ashfaq UA, Aslam B, Waseem M, Xu Q, et al. Dissemination of blaOXA-23-harbouring carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clones in Pakistan. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;21:357-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.jgar.2020.01.001] [PMID]
50. Mortazavi SM, Farshadzadeh Z, Janabadi S, Musavi M, Shahi F, Moradi M, et al. Evaluating the frequency of carbapenem and aminoglycoside resistance genes among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii from Ahvaz, south-west Iran. New Microbes New Infect. 2020;38:100779. [DOI:10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100779] [PMID] [PMCID]
51. Ostrer L, Khodursky RF, Johnson JR, Hiasa H, Khodursky A. Analysis of mutational patterns in quinolone resistance-determining regions of GyrA and ParC of clinical isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;53(3):318-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.12.004] [PMID]
52. Leus Inga V, Weeks Jon W, Bonifay V, Smith L, Richardson S, Zgurskaya Helen I. Substrate Specificities and Efflux Efficiencies of RND Efflux Pumps of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Bacteriol. 2018;200(13):e00049-18. [DOI:10.1128/JB.00049-18] [PMID] [PMCID]
53. Coyne S, Courvalin P, Périchon B. Efflux-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance in Acinetobacter spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(3):947-53. [DOI:10.1128/AAC.01388-10] [PMID] [PMCID]
54. Sharma A, Sharma R, Bhattacharyya T, Bhando T, Pathania R. Fosfomycin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is mediated by efflux through a major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter-AbaF. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(1):68-74. [DOI:10.1093/jac/dkw382] [PMID]
55. Yakkala H, Samantarrai D, Gribskov M, Siddavattam D. Comparative genome analysis reveals niche-specific genome expansion in Acinetobacter baumannii strains. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218204. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0218204] [PMID] [PMCID]
56. Choi CH, Hyun SH, Lee JY, Lee JS, Lee YS, Kim SA, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii outer membrane protein A targets the nucleus and induces cytotoxicity. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(2):309-19.
57. Tipton Kyle A, Dimitrova D, Rather Philip N. Phase-Variable Control of Multiple Phenotypes in Acinetobacter baumannii Strain AB5075. J Bacteriol. 2015;197(15):2593-9. [DOI:10.1128/JB.00188-15] [PMID] [PMCID]
58. Andersen SB, Ghoul M, Griffin AS, Petersen B, Johansen HK, Molin S. Diversity, prevalence, and longitudinal occurrence of type II toxin-antitoxin systems of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infecting cystic fibrosis lungs. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1180. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01180] [PMID] [PMCID]
59. Bobay L-M, Rocha EPC, Touchon M. The Adaptation of Temperate Bacteriophages to Their Host Genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):737-51. [DOI:10.1093/molbev/mss279] [PMID] [PMCID]
60. Touchon M, Bernheim A, Rocha EPC. Genetic and life-history traits associated with the distribution of prophages in bacteria. ISME J. 2016;10(11):2744-54. [DOI:10.1038/ismej.2016.47] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Publisher: Farname Inc