year 15, Issue 1 (January - February 2021)                   Iran J Med Microbiol 2021, 15(1): 85-106 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shemshad N, Roozbeh Nasiraie L, Majidzadeh Heravi R. Isolation of Probiotic Lactobacilli Bacteria from Traditional Naein Dairy Product (Koome). Iran J Med Microbiol 2021; 15 (1) :85-106
URL: http://ijmm.ir/article-1-1141-en.html
1- Ph.D student, Department of Science and Food Technology, Islamic Azad University- Nour branch, Nour, Iran
2- Assistant professor, Department of Science and Food Technology, Islamic Azad University- Nour branch, Nour, Iran , leila_roozbeh@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 1127 kb]   (1840 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (5247 Views)
Full-Text:   (1400 Views)
Introduction

.

Fermented products, such as yogurt, kefir, sauerkraut, kombucha, and other dairy products, which have traditionally been used by people since ancient times now entered the field of biotechnology (1). Science of probiotic therapy as the result of the development of this process in food microbiology addresses the beneficial influences of probiotics (live microorganisms in food) in the host body (2).
Therapeutic effects and the positive impacts of probiotics on health are important due to stimulating the growth of intestinal beneficial microorganisms, decreasing the population of harmful bacteria, and helping the natural defense mechanisms of the body (3). Benefits of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from traditional dairy products in preventing and treating diseases have been confirmed and no negative side effects have been noted for these probiotics (4).
Probiotic bacteria of the LAB group are gram-positive bacteria present in the microbial flora of the human digestive system. These bacteria are applied in food fermentation procedures and nowadays are considered as a mucosal barrier with the ability for regulating immune responses (5). According to the National Food Standard, probiotic bacteria should survive not only during the shelf life of food but also after passing through gastric acid, enzymes, and bile alkaline salts and should reach their activity site (intestine). Therefore, the foods which are claimed to impose healthy effects need to contain 107 living probiotics per one gram at the time of consumption (1).
Lactobacilli were isolated from milk the first time and nowadays in the food industry, probiotics are known as a part of fermented dairy products, including kefir and soured milk. Over 70 products containing LAB are being produced throughout the world, namely sour cream, powdered milk, and fermented beverages (1). Koome is a traditional dairy product of ovine milk, which has long been produced in sheepskin bags in the rural areas around Naein, Isfahan province, Iran. Considering the unique physicochemical and microbiologic characteristics and the lack of salt, koome could be proposed as one of the best traditional dairy products with long shelf life.
Sharifi et al. (2017) evaluated 96 samples of traditional bovine, ovine, and caprine yogurt. Their results revealed that 47 samples had LAB with probiotic characteristics, including Lactobacillus lactis, L. brevis, and L. fermentum (6). Famouri et al. (2017) investigated the therapeutic characteristics and health effects of L. plantarum and L. brevis isolated from ten specimens of traditional fermented dairy products. Reduced serum cholesterol and heavy metals were among the favorable findings (7).
Handa et al. (2016) studied the LAB from two samples of fermented grain-based drinks. They isolated and identified the LAB with probiotic characteristics, such as Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus acidophilus and confirmed the positive effects of these bacteria on health (2). The present study aimed to isolate Lactobacilli with probiotic potential from the traditional dairy products of Naein, Iran. This genus of bacteria is widely used in diverse industries, namely the food, pharmaceutical, and supplements industries. Therefore, the recognition and classification of this genius of bacteria provide valuable information for researchers in different fields.


 

Materials and Methods

Sampling and Microbial Culture
A total of five bovine koome samples and three ovine koome specimens were collected from the surrounding rural areas of Naein. Next, for isolation, a homogeny of 10 g of each sample in 90 mL of diluent was made and serial dilutions were obtained. The dilutions were inoculated on MRS agar and were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The grown colonies were tested for isolating Lactobacilli from other organisms and morphologic evaluation. To this aim, each colony was cultured on medium to reach a single colony and purify. Afterwards, the purified culture was stored for further tests (8).

Isolating Lactobacilli
A catalase test was carried out to check the production of catalase enzyme by bacteria. In this test, a small part of the intended colony was placed on a sterile slide using a sterile loop and was mixed with a drop of hydrogen peroxide 3% (catalase reagent). The lack of bubble production means that the tested bacterium does not produce catalase enzyme and is known as catalase-negative. At the end of this step, the bacilliform, catalase-negative, and gram positive Lactobacilli colonies with different morphologies were coded and assessed for probiotic properties. Superficial culture was performed from the coded samples (9).

Probiotic Evaluation

Resistance to Bile and Acid Conditions

Survival of microorganisms was investigated in broth medium with acidic pH of 2, 2.5, and 3 similar to the digestive system. The number of living microorganisms was counted as presented as a percentage of the initial number following incubation at 37°C for 1 and 2 h. Resistance and growth reduction of microorganisms were assessed through incubating at 37°C for 8 h the presence of 0.7% and 1% of bile salts (bile oxalate).
The resistance of microorganisms in gastric and intestinal conditions was tested by inoculation to simulated broth media for the stomach (6.23 g sodium chloride, 0.229g calcium chloride, 2.29 g potassium chloride, 1.2 g sodium bicarbonate, pepsin enzyme with the concentration of 0.3%, and pH=2±0.2) and intestine (1.28 g sodium chloride, 0.239 g potassium chloride, 6.4 g calcium bicarbonate, 0.5% X-gal and pancreatin enzyme with the final concentration of 0.1%, and pH=8). Next, culture was completed on agar medium and colonies were counted following overnight incubation at 37°C (8).

Identification of Acid-producing Bacteria
Acidproductionin culture medium by microorganisms was investigated based on pH reduction in the medium after 24 h incubation at 37°C. Bacteria with a lower pH than the initial pH of 6.22 were considered as acid-producing microorganisms (10).

Antimicrobial Activity
The ability of the intended isolates for producing antimicrobial compounds against standard pathogen bacteria was examined based on the presence of the zone of inhibition on agar medium. In this method, 200 µL of the active culture of pathogen bacterium was inoculated to a tube containing nutrient agar culture medium 1% (soft agar) and was added to nutrient agar 1.5% in a plate after cooling and was refrigerated for 30 min. Afterwards, sterile blank discs dipped in the supernatant of the isolate were fixed smoothly on the plate and were refrigerated for 20 min followed by incubation at 37°C. After incubation, the zone of inhibition was measured using a ruler and the presence of this zone was reported as antimicrobial impact against pathogen microorganisms (11).

Antibiotic Resistance
Sensitivity or resistance of probiotic bacteria to common antibiotics in medicine was evaluated by measuring the diameter of the zone of inhibition. First, active culture was prepared from probiotic bacteria. Next, 4 mL of sterile MRS agar 1% was poured into each tube. Following the cooling of culture media, 200 µL of fresh active probiotic culture was inoculated to each tube and was mixed thoroughly.
Plates containing MRS agar 1.5% were prepared and located at room temperature for 10 min to reach room temperature. Afterwards, a culture medium containing the prepared bacterium was gently added to the plate and refrigerated for 30 min until the bacteria were absorbed on the medium. Plates were taken out of the refrigerator and sterile antibiotic discs with a diameter of 0.7 cm were located and the plates were refrigerated for 20 min. Next, plates were incubated at 30°C for 12 h and the diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured on 8-12 h and the final diameter was presented in mm. Test results were reported as resistant, semi-sensitive, and sensitive according to the size of the zones of inhibition (12).

Cholesterol Reduction Test
In order to evaluate the ability of microorganisms for cholesterol hydrolysis, 0.2 mL of microorganism suspension in broth medium was inoculated to 20 mL of culture medium containing 100 µg/mL of cholesterol oxalate and was incubated at 37°C for 16 h. Afterwards, the tubes were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. Next, o.5 mL of the supernatant was transferred to a glass tube and was mixed with 3 mL ethanol 95% followed by adding 2 mL potassium hydroxide 50%. The mixture was homogenized by 1 min vortex after the addition of each component.
The tubes were heated in a water bath of 60°C for 10 min and were cooled at room temperature. In the next step, 5 mL hexane was added to each tube and vortex was used for 20 sec followed by adding 3 mL of distilled water and 1 min vortex. The tubes were left at room temperature for 15 min or until the water and organic phases were completely separated. Afterwards, 2.5 mL of hexane layer (the upper layer) was poured into clean tubes and hexane was evaporated at 65°C in a water bath.
The liquid remaining in the tubes was mixed with 4 mL of o-phthalaldehyde and was kept at room temperature for 10 min. Next, 2 mL of sulfuric acid was added to each tube and was left at room temperature for 10 min. the absorbance of samples was read using a spectrophotometer at the wavelength of 550 nm versus blank (13).

Bile Salt Hydrolase Activity Assay
The zone of deoxycholic acid precipitation around the colonies in the culture medium containing the salt of bile acids was evaluated. To this aim, 10 µL of microorganism suspension was cultured on the surface of the MRX agar plate and was incubated at a suitable temperature. In the case of hydrolase activity, white precipitation and scattered zones surrounding colonies were clear. When these zones could not be observed, 0.037% calcium chloride could be added to the culture and blank discs dipped in 10 µL bacterial suspension are applied on the plate surface. A zone of white precipitation around the disc indicates bile salt hydrolysis by the tested bacterium (14).

Identification of the Isolates Selected by Probiotic Tests
Seven isolates with relative priority to other isolates in probiotic tests were identified by the DNA sequencing of the 16s ribosomal region. The mentioned region was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) utilizing Gradient Palm-Cycler (Corbett Life Science Pty. Ltd., Australia). General primers with the forward sequence of 5′GAG AGT TTG ATC CTG GCT CAG 3′ and the reverse sequence of 5′GAA AGG AGG TGA TCC AGC CG 3′ were applied for amplifying the intended segment (15).
The reaction set was as follow: 2 min at 95°C, 35 cycles at 95°C for 45 sec, 45 sec at 53°C, 60 sec at 72°C and the final step of 3 min at 73°C. The reaction product was electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose gel, the segment was extracted from the gel and after confirming the band length and concentration determination, it was sent to Microsynth, Switzerland for sequencing. 

Statistical Analysis
The obtained data were analyzed as a random design with 3 repeats using SAS version 9.2. Moreover, Excel software version 2010 was used to draw the graphs.
 

 

Results

Resistance to Bile Salts and Acid

Findings of catalase test, gram staining, and the microscopic examination of isolates revealed that 15 colonies were bacilliform, gram-positive, and catalase-negative, which were selected for probiotic tests and were encoded as S1-S15. The results of bile salts resistance assay at the concentrations of 0.3%, 0.7%, and 1% following 8 h of incubation are demonstrated in Table 1
Moreover, the findings of testing X-gal 0.3% for the 15 intended isolates showed that S5 was highly resistant and S8, S9, S11, and S14 were resistant. In addition, S1, S2, S3, S4, S6, S7, S10, S13, and S15 isolates were sensitive. In media containing 0.7% and 1% bile salts. The isolates S8, S5, and S11 were resistant, while S9 and S14 were found as sensitive. As a result, 20% of the isolates were resistant to 0.7% and 1% concentrations of bile salts and S8, S5, and S11 were known as bile-resistant isolates.
Test of resistance to acid revealed that S15, S14, S13, S10, S2, and S1 were not sufficiently resistant to pH=3 following an hour of incubation at 37°C and had the viability percentage of zero. On the other hand, S11 and S12 had the highest viability rate of 96% followed by the isolates S9, S8, S7, S6, S5, S4, and S3 with the viability of 55%-60% after an hour of incubation. The resistant isolates in the latter step were tested at pH=2.5. The lowest and highest viability percentages following two hours of incubation at pH=2.5 were observed for S12 and S9, respectively. Afterward, the resistant isolates in this stage were tested at pH=2. The results indicated that the most resistant bacteria to acid pH were S11, S7, and S5.

 

 Table 1. Inhibition coefficient of samples in the assay of resistance to 0.3%, 0.7%, and 1% bile salts after 8 h incubation at 37
Final result Inhibition coefficient
1%
Final result Inhibition coefficient
0.7%
Final result Inhibition coefficient
0.3%
Bacterium code
- - - - Sensitive 1 S1
- - - - Sensitive 0.91 S2
- - - - Sensitive 1 S3
- - - - Sensitive 1 S4
Resistant 0.14 Resistant 0.39 Highly resistant 0.19 S5
- - - - Sensitive 1 S6
- - - - Sensitive 0.84 S7
Resistant 0.28 Resistant 0.29 Resistant 0.31 S8
Sensitive 0.74 Sensitive 0.98 Resistant 0.37 S9
- - - - Sensitive 1 S10
Resistant 0.43 Resistant 0.24 Resistant 0.43 S11
- - - - Sensitive 0.85 S12
- - - - Sensitive 0.53 S13
Sensitive 1 Sensitive 0.62 Resistant 0.24 S14
- - - - Sensitive 1 S15

Resistance to gastric juice was evaluated in 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min (Figure 1A). In this assay, isolates S5, S7, and S11 were tested as the isolates selected by acid test and S5, S8, and S11 as the isolates chosen by the bile resistance test. However, S14 was examined due to resistance to 0.3% bile and isolates S3, S4, S6, S9, and S12 were assessed because of resistance to pH=3.
The results are summarized in Figure 1. As could be observed, isolates S4, S14, and S6 had the lowest resistance to the simulated conditions of the stomach as viability reached zero after 30 min. isolates S8, S9, and S12, which were resistant to pH=2.5 but sensitive to pH=2, were destroyed after 120 min of exposure to simulated gastric conditions. The isolates resistant to pH=2, including S7, S11, and S5 were the most resistant bacteria to gastric simulated conditions following 2h of incubation. However, S7 and S11 have significantly higher viability than S5 (P<0.05) as they showed the viability of 62%, 59%, and 40%, respectively.
Resistance to intestinal juice was assessed on 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min (Figure 1B). As demonstrated, the S6 isolate had the lowest resistance to the simulated conditions of the intestine as the viability reached zero in 30 min. The viability of isolates S3 and S9 was zero following 60 min. in the present study, S3 and S9 were reported to be sensitive to the bile concentration of 0.3% and 0%, respectively. Viability of S4, S7, S12, and S14 reached zero in 90 min, all of which were sensitive to 0.3% bile except S14, which was found to be sensitive to 0.7% bile. 
Finally, S5 and S11 isolates were able to tolerate intestinal simulated conditions with a 50% decrease in viability in 120 min. however, the mentioned isolates were not significantly different in terms of viability (P>0.05). Viability of S8 was zero after 120 min showing the lower resistance of this isolate, compared to S5 and S11.  
Table 2 indicates the findings of the medium pH reduction test. Isolates S7 and S10 caused the highest and lowest pH decrease, respectively. Furthermore, isolates S3, S4, and S5 were not significantly different from S7 in this regard (P>0.05).  

 
 Figure 1. Viability percentage of the samples in the simulated conditions of gastric juice (A) and intestinal juice (B) during 2 h of incubation at 37.  Different letters indicate significant difference among various treatments (p< 0.05).
 Figure 1. Viability percentage of the samples in the simulated conditions of gastric juice (A) and intestinal juice (B) during 2 h of incubation at 37.  Different letters indicate significant difference among various treatments (p< 0.05).
Figure 1. Viability percentage of the samples in the simulated conditions of gastric juice (A) and intestinal juice (B) during 2 h of incubation at 37.  Different letters indicate significant difference among various treatments (p< 0.05).
 
Table 2.  Percentage of medium pH reduction by bacterial isolates derived from Naein traditional dairy product after 24 h of incubation at 37
 Values with different superscript letters in the column mean the significant difference between treatments (P<0.05)
Ranking pH reduction percentage Final pH Bacterium code
13 de8.8 5.67 S1
11 19.9 cd 4.98 S2
3 41.6 ab 3.63 S3
5 39.2 ab 3.78 S4
4 40.9 ab 3.67 S5
8 26 bcd 4.6 S6
1 57 a 2.67 S7
14 6.2de 5.83 S8
7 32.6bc 4.19 S9
15 4.5e 5.94 S10
2 45.4b 3.39 S11
12 16.8d 5.17 S12
6 37.1bc 3.91 S13
9 23.1bcd 4.78 S14
10 21.3bcd 4.89 S15
  0.001   P-value
  4.023 Mean standard error
 
Antimicrobial Activity
Findings of antimicrobial activity tests are demonstrated in Table 3. The highest antimicrobial effect was observed for S4 and S9 isolates (P<0.05). In other words, these isolates are the best choices for inhibiting Salmonella typhimurium. The bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa was significantly better inhibited by S4, S5, S12, and S14, compared to other isolates (P<0.05). Isolates S3, S6, and S8 significantly inhibited Escherichia coli (P<0.05).  Moreover, Staphylococcus aureus was significantly inhibited by S7 and the yeast Candida albicans were inhibited by S3 and S14 (P<0.05).
 
 Table 3. Antimicrobial activity and ranking of isolates based on the diameter (mm) of the zone against pathogen bacteria
 Values with different superscript letters in the column mean the significant difference between treatments (P<0.05)
TBacterium code Salmonella typhimurium Escherichia coli Staphylococcus aureus Pseudomonas aeruginosa Candida albicans
Ranking Zone diameter Ranking Zone diameter Ranking Zone diameter Ranking Zone diameter Ranking Zone diameter
S3 8 12bc 2 23.5a 6 17ab 5 19.5ab 2 23a
S4 2 21.5a 10 9bc 4 19ab 4 21.5a 10 7.5b
S5 5 15bc 8 13abc 8 9c 3 22a 6 17.5ab
S6 10 8.5cd 3 21.75a 7 13bc 6 18.75ab 9 8b
S7 6 14.25bc 9 12.25abc 1 22a 8 18ab 4 18.75ab
S8 4 18.5ab 1 25a 10 8c 9 14ab 7 17ab
S9 1 23.5a 6 18ab 3 19.5ab 7 18.5ab 5 18.5ab
S11 9 10bc 11 6.5c 11 7.5c 11 7.5c 8 14b
S12 3 19ab 5 19ab 5 18.5ab 1 25a 11 7b
S14 11 7.25cd 7 17.5abc 9 8.5c 2 22.5a 1 23.5a
Antibiotic Cefalexin Amoxicillin Streptomycin Erythromycin Vancomycin
7 12.5bc 4 20ab 2 20ab 10 11.25bc 3 19ab
P-value   0.0001   0.0001   0.045   0.049   0.038
Mean standard error   3.351   3.821   4.231   2.986   3.593
Antibiotic Resistance
Table 4 demonstrates the results of antibiotic resistance for bacterial isolates from Naein traditional dairy product based on the diameter of the zone (mm). Most of the bacteria were sensitive or semi-sensitive to amoxicillin as S3, S4, and S5 were sensitive and isolates S6, S8, and S9 were semi-sensitive to amoxicillin. On the other hand, eight isolates were resistant to vancomycin and cephalexin. Isolates S3, S4, S5, S7, S9, S11, S12, and S14 were found to be resistant to vancomycin and S3, S5, S6, S7, S8, S11, S12, and S14 were resistant to cephalexin.

 
Table 4. antibiotic resistance of bacterial isolates from Naein traditional dairy product based on the diameter of the zone (mm) 
FM300
Nitrofurantoin
CN30
Cefalexin
V30
Vancomycin
S10
Streptomycin
C30
Chloramphenicol
AMX 25
Amoxicillin
E15
Erythromycin
Isolate code
Semi-sensitive Resistant Resistant Semi-sensitive Resistant Sensitive Resistant S3
Resistant Sensitive Resistant Resistant Sensitive Sensitive Sensitive S4
Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant Sensitive Resistant S5
Resistant Resistant Sensitive Resistant Semi-sensitive Semi-sensitive Resistant S6
Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant S7
Sensitive Resistant Semi-sensitive Sensitive Resistant Semi-sensitive Resistant S8
Resistant Semi-sensitive Resistant Resistant Semi-sensitive Semi-sensitive Resistant S9
- Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant Sensitive S11
Sensitive Resistant Resistant Sensitive Resistant Resistant Resistant S12
Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant Resistant - S14

Cholesterol Reduction

Results of cholesterol reduction by the bacterial isolates of Naein dairy product after 16 h of incubation at 37°C are shown in Table 5. Isolates S5 and S11 were significantly different from other isolates with reductions of 99% and 98%, respectively (P<0.05). The S8 and S9 with cholesterol reduction of 87% and 80% were not significantly different from S5 and S11 (P>0.05). Isolates S5, S11, and S8 had a suitable resistance to bile salts as could tolerate 1% of bile salts. The S9 and S14 could only tolerate 0.3% bile salt. Isolates S5 and S11 were reported to have suitable tolerance against acid conditions as could tolerate pH=2. Furthermore, isolate S12 was found to be able to tolerate acidic conditions up to pH=2.5. We observed that S5, S11, S8, and S9 has the highest cholesterol reduction levels. Isolate S12 was shown to impose the lowest impact on cholesterol reduction
.

 Table 5. cholesterol reduction percentage by bacterial isolates from Naein traditional dairy product after 16 h of incubation at 37°C
 Values with different superscript letters in the column mean the significant difference between treatments (P<0.05)
Ranking Cholesterol reduction percentage Bacterium code  
1 99.14a S5  
2 87.32ab S8  
3 80.5ab S9  
1 98.41a S11  
4 71.35b S12  
3 76.28b S14  
  0.012 P-value  
  5.571 Mean standard error  
(Over 95% rank 1, over 85% rank 2, over 75% rank 3, and over 70% rank 4)

Table 6 shows the findings of the bile salts hydrolase activity test. In this test, bile-resistant isolates (i.e., S5, S8, S9, S11, and S14), in addition to S12 as a negative control for controlling test accuracy were selected. The obtained results were reported as the measurement of the white zone produced by isolates in mm.
According to our findings, isolates S8, S5, and S11 had orderly the largest zones (P<0.05). Considering the cholesterol reduction test, these results could be expected because the latter isolates had the highest percentages of cholesterol reduction. Activity of bile acids hydrolyzing enzyme was observed for the isolates, which could reduce blood cholesterol. Therefore, a correlation was suggested between these two features.

 

Table 6. Bile salts hydrolysis by the bacterial isolates of Naein traditional dairy product based on the diameter of zones
 Values with different superscript letters in the column mean the significant difference between treatments (P<0.05)
 
Ranking Strong, weak, moderate Zone diameter (mm) Bacterium code
2 Strong 3.5ab S5
1 Strong 4a S8
4 Moderate 2.5b S9
3 Strong 3ab S11
6 Weak 1.5b S12
5 Moderate 2.25b S14
    0.032 P-value
    0.574 Mean standard error
Molecular Identification of Bacterial Isolates with Probiotic Characteristics

Bacterial isolates S5, S8, S9, S11, and S14 had the potential for cholesterol reduction and bile salts hydrolysis. Moreover, S3 had higher antimicrobial properties and S7 was highly resistant to pH variations with strong antimicrobial impact. As a result, the aforementioned isolates were investigated using PCR for 16sr RNA for molecular identification. Results of sequencing were compared with the sequences in gene banks, including EzBioCloud (eztaxon) and NCBI. The final findings of sequencing for the evaluated isolates are summarized in Table 7. Consequently, Naein traditional dairy product had diverse genera of Lactobacillus, among which L. pentosus, L. crustorum, L. brevis, and L. fermentum were identified.   
    

 Table 7. Sequence BLAST of ribosomal 16s region of the DNAs of the isolates from Naein traditional dairy product according to the databases of NCBI and eztaxon
Similarity
(%)
Isolate Species in NCBI Similarity
(%)
Isolate Species in Taxon Bacterium code
100 Strain H1,16S ribosomal RNA gene Lactobacillus Plantarum 100 DSM
20314 (T)
Lactobacillus pentosus S3
100 Strain B481,16S ribosomal RNA gene Lactobacillus Crustorum 99.93 LMG
23699 (T)
Lactobacillus Crustorum S5
99.71 Strain APBSMLB166,16S ribosomal RNA gene Lactobacillus fermentum 99.71 CECT
562 (T)
Lactobacillus fermentum S7
100 Strain PS7319,16S ribosomal RNA gene Lactobacillus Plantarum 99.93 DSM
20314 (T)
Lactobacillus Pentosus S8
 
99.36 Strain 10-18 16S ribosomal RNA gene Lactobacillus fermentum 99.36 CECT
562 (T)
Lactobacillus fermentum S9
100 Strain NOS7311 16S ribosomal RNA gene Lactobacillus brevis 99.86 ATCC
14869 (T)
Lactobacillus brevis S11
100 Strain SKB1021 16S ribosomal RNA gene Lactobacillus brevis 99.93 ATCC
14869 (T)
Lactobacillus brevis S14

 

Discussion

Evaluation of resistance to acidic conditions revealed that six out of 15 bacterial isolates had a suitable resistance to pH=2.5. Sharifi et al. (2017) investigated probiotic characteristics of the bacteria isolated from traditional yogurt in Yazd, Iran in pH=2.5-3. They reported lower resistance of Bifidobacteria, in comparison with Lactobacilli. In addition, they showed that Lactobacillus isolates were more resistant to acidic conditions than Streptococcus and Enterococcus. Overall, their findings were indicative of the diminished number of all isolates at pH=2.5 after 2 h.
Akbanda et al. (2013) demonstrated that at H=2.5, a decrease in the viability of bacteria was remarkable following 2 h, compared to 1 h (16). Consistent with our findings, they revealed that time was effective in the reduction of resistance and viability of isolates. The viability of isolates at pH=2 showed lower viability after 120 min than 60 min. It could be attributed to the higher lysis rate of the bacterial cell wall by the acid in longer contact. Majidzadeh et al. (2011) investigated the impact of time and pH on the reduction of isolates activity. They reported that the isolates had a 55%-60% decrease in viability following 2 h of incubation at pH=2, which was in line with the findings of the current study (17).
Results of bile salts resistance assay showed that 60% of the isolates were sensitive to bile salts. Sharifi et al. (2017) tested 24 Lactobacillus isolates from traditional yogurt of Yazd, Iran using bovine bile extract 0.3% for 8 h. They reported 10, 2, and 12 isolates as resistant, highly resistant, and sensitive, respectively. Their results are consistent with the present investigation. Hajighassemi et al. (2016) recognized five resistant isolates following 8 h of incubation beside 0.3% bile salts and two resistant isolates utilizing 0.7% bile salts (8).
Isolates S8, S9, and S12, which were resistant to pH=2.5 but sensitive to pH=2, were destroyed after 120 min of exposure to gastric simulated conditions. As expected, isolates S7, S11, and S5, which were resistant to pH=2, were the most resistant bacteria to gastric simulated conditions after 2 h of incubation as they indicated 62%, 59%, and 40% viability. Gastric pepsin enzyme affects bacterial cell walls due to proteolytic activity and destroys the bacteria. A study on probiotic characteristics revealed that the viability of L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus GG had a 60% reduction in gastric simulated conditions under treatment by the whole salt with pepsin enzyme for 120 min.
In intestinal simulated conditions, S6 had the lowest resistance as expected because the viability of this bacterium reached zero after 60 min in gastric simulated conditions and was not resistant to pH=.5. Moreover, this bacterium could not tolerate 0.3% bile salts and was reported as sensitive. Another investigation on the viability of L. rhamnosus GG in intestinal simulated conditions demonstrated that the most reduction in viability occurred after 30 min of exposure to intestinal simulated conditions. This could be attributed to the sudden shock due to bacterial exposure to high pH and bile salts indicating the higher sensitivity of this bacterium to intestinal simulated conditions (19).
Evaluation of antimicrobial effects showed that isolates S9 and S4 were the best options for inhibiting S. typhimurium, S12 and S14 were the best for P. aeruginosa and isolates S3 and S8 were the most effective for E. coli. In addition, the best isolates for the inhibition of S. aureus were S7 and S9 and for C. albicans yeast were S3 and S14. The antimicrobial impact of some Lactobacillus isolates was correlated with pH decrease (20). However, the antimicrobial properties cannot be completed attributed to pH reduction. The secretion of bacteriocins as antibacterial compounds by Lactobacilli is believed to play role in this regard (21).
Numerous studies are still being conducted in this regard. Sharifi et al. (2017) reported a strong antimicrobial activity for L. rhamnosus and L. fermentum against the pathogenic bacteria S. typhimurium, S. aureus, and E. coli. An investigation was performed on the antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus isolates from two samples of traditional yogurt. It was found that L. acidophilus with the mean diameter of 14.68 mm for the zone of inhibition against S. typhimurium and S. aureus along with L. plantarum with the mean diameter of 12.37 mm against P. aeruginosa had the highest antimicrobial activity. The mentioned findings were in line with the results of the present study.
A considerable aspect in terms of the safety of probiotics is antibiotic resistance. This is the potential risk of the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes among Lactobacilli. Following passing acidic conditions and bile in the digestive system, the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes located on plasmid to the flora of the digestive system and even intestinal epithelial cells is possible. As a result, the safety of using such bacteria as probiotics is reduced (22).
A study was performed on the resistance of Lactobacillus isolates from Mazandaran, Iran traditional cheese to the common antibiotics. It was observed that most of the isolates were resistant to streptomycin, vancomycin, and gentamycin, sensitive to amoxicillin, and semi-sensitive to nitrofurantoin (23), which is consistent with our results.
Tissay et al. (2014) in a clinical study, reported the influence of L. rhamnosus and L. bulgaricus on the diminish of blood cholesterol in rats. Furthermore, they stated that Pediococcus acidilactici could cause a 20% reduction in serum total cholesterol of rats (14). Shahat et al. (2016) evaluated the impact of probiotic isolates from a traditional fermented dairy product on health. These authors demonstrated that in laboratory conditions, isolates L. plantarum and L. brevis could reduce cholesterol (13).
Simultaneous with the enzymatic activity for further hydrolysis of bile salts by the isolates, cholesterol reduction and detoxification occurs in the digestive system, especially the liver. Comparison of the potential for bile salts indicates that the higher the ability of bacteria for hydrolysis of these salts, the better the reduction and detoxification by the digestive system and liver is performed (24)
Mirlohi et al. (2010) in a clinical study on laboratory mice, noted that L. plantarum was influential in the reduction of serum cholesterol. They considered having bile-hydrolyzing enzyme as one of the factors for cholesterol reduction by probiotic isolates, which caused an 8%-10% decrease in blood cholesterol (10).
Tissay et al. (2014) investigated bile salts derived from bovine bile in the diet of mice. They showed that L. acidophilus and L. fermentum led to the highest rate of serum cholesterol reduction, which was in line with the findings of the present study (isolate L. fermentum, S8). They attributed the decrease in serum cholesterol to the production of bile-hydrolyzing enzymes by Lactobacillus isolates (14)

 


 

Conclusion

According to the findings of the current study, koome is highly potential for isolating probiotic isolates and contains active probiotic isolates. Therefore, in the present investigation, isolates with probiotic characteristics were derived from this fermented dairy product of Naein. Isolates obtained from this product were demonstrated to have diverse potentials for healthy effects on the digestive system, such as having anti-pathogen activity, inducing acidic conditions, and hydrolyzing cholesterol.

 
 
Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.
 


 

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Food Microbiology
Received: 2020/05/15 | Accepted: 2020/11/7 | ePublished: 2021/01/10

References
1. Bastani P, Akbarzadeh F, Homayouni A, Javadi M, Khalili L. Health Benefits of Probiotic Consumption. In: Garg N, Abdel-Aziz SM, Aeron A, editors. Microbes in Food and Health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 163-83. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-25277-3_9] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Handa S, Sharma N. In vitro study of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum F22 isolated from chhang-A traditional fermented beverage of Himachal Pradesh, India. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2016;14(1):91-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jgeb.2016.08.001] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Jadhav K, Sharma K, Katoch S, Sharma V, Mane B. Probiotics in broiler poultry feeds: A review. J Anim Nutr Physiol. 2015;1:04-16.
4. Barzegari A, Eslami S, Ghabeli E, Omidi Y. Imposition of encapsulated non-indigenous probiotics into intestine may disturb human core microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:393. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00393] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Anal AK, Singh H. Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007;18(5):240-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.004]
6. Sharifi Yazdi MK, Davoodabadi A, Khesht Zarin HR, Tajabadi Ebrahimi M, Soltan Dallal MM. Characterisation and probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Iranian traditional yogurts. Ital J Anim Sci. 2017;16(2):185-8. [DOI:10.1080/1828051X.2016.1222888]
7. Famouri F, Shariat Z, Hashemipour M, Keikha M, Kelishadi R. Effects of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(3):413-7. [DOI:10.1097/MPG.0000000000001422] [PMID]
8. Hajighasemi M, Mojgani N. Identification and Characterization of Probiotic Properties of Indigenous Lactic Acid Bacteria Based on Their Phenotypic and Genotypic Characteristics. Iran J Med Microbiol: Volume. 2016;9(4).
9. Halt J, Krieg N, Sneath P, Stely J, Williums S. Bergey's Manual of systemic Bacteriology. London; 1985.
10. Mirlouhi M, Soleymanianzad S, Sheykh zeyn aldin M. Identification of Lactobacilli from fecal flora of some Iranian infants. Iran J Pediatr. 2008;18(4):357-63.
11. de Valdez GF, Taranto MP. Probiotic Properties of Lactobacilli. Food Microbiology Protocols: Springer; 2001. p. 173-81.
12. Wong A, Ngu DYS, Dan LA, Ooi A, Lim RLH. Detection of antibiotic resistance in probiotics of dietary supplements. Nutr J. 2015;14(1):95. [DOI:10.1186/s12937-015-0084-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Shehata M, El Sohaimy S, El-Sahn MA, Youssef M. Screening of isolated potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria for cholesterol lowering property and bile salt hydrolase activity. Ann Agric Sci. 2016;61(1):65-75. [DOI:10.1016/j.aoas.2016.03.001]
14. Tsai C-C, Lin P-P, Hsieh Y-M, Zhang Z-y, Wu H-C, Huang C-C. Cholesterol-lowering potentials of lactic acid bacteria based on bile-salt hydrolase activity and effect of potent strains on cholesterol metabolism in vitro and in vivo. Sci World J. 2014;2014. [DOI:10.1155/2014/690752] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Taheri HR, Moravej H, Tabandeh F, Zaghari M, Shivazad M. Screening of lactic acid bacteria toward their selection as a source of chicken probiotic. Poult Sci. 2009;88(8):1586-93. [DOI:10.3382/ps.2009-00041] [PMID]
16. Akabanda F, Owusu-Kwarteng J, Tano-Debrah K, Glover RL, Nielsen DS, Jespersen L. Taxonomic and molecular characterization of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in nunu, a Ghanaian fermented milk product. Food microbiol. 2013;34(2):277-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.fm.2012.09.025] [PMID]
17. Majidzadeh Heravi R, Kermanshahi H, Sankian M, Nassiri M, Moussavi AH, Nasiraii LR, et al. Screening of lactobacilli bacteria isolated from gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens for their use as probiotic. African J Microbiol Res. 2011;5:1858-68. [DOI:10.5897/AJMR11.416]
18. Esmaeli F, Roozbeh Nasiraie L. Comparision of different treatments of simulated gastrointestinal conditions in probiotic bacterial Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus GG in order to achive the most realistic and practical model, : Islamic Azad University, Nour branch; 2014.
19. Boricha AA, Shekh S, Pithva SP, Padma S, Bharatkumar A, Vyas R. In vitro evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus species of food and human origin. LWT. 2019;106:201-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2019.02.021]
20. Hu CH, Ren LQ, Zhou Y, Ye BC. Characterization of antimicrobial activity of three Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Chinese traditional dairy food. Food Sci Nutr. 2019;7(6):1997-2005. [DOI:10.1002/fsn3.1025] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Leite AM, Miguel M, Peixoto R, Ruas-Madiedo P, Paschoalin V, Mayo B, et al. Probiotic potential of selected lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from Brazilian kefir grains. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(6):3622-32. [DOI:10.3168/jds.2014-9265] [PMID]
22. Kim YI, Poudel BK, Pradhan R, Choi H-G, Yong CS, Woo JS, et al. Development of a novel bi-coated combination capsule containing mosapride and probiotics for irritable bowel syndrome. Pharm Dev Technol. 2015;20(8):949-56. [DOI:10.3109/10837450.2014.954723] [PMID]
23. Tavakoli M, Hamidi-Esfahani Z, Hejazi MA, Azizi MH, Abbasi S. Characterization of probiotic abilities of Lactobacilli isolated from Iranian Koozeh traditional cheese. Pol J Food Nutr Sci. 2017;67(1):41-8. [DOI:10.1515/pjfns-2016-0003]
24. Rani RP, Anandharaj M, Ravindran AD. Characterization of bile salt hydrolase from Lactobacillus gasseri FR4 and demonstration of its substrate specificity and inhibitory mechanism using molecular docking analysis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1004. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01004] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Publisher: Farname Inc